中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 490-493.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220811-01024

• 人文素质教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

叙事医学在医学科普教育宣传中的应用

赖东武1, 王筝扬2, 郭洪彬3   

  1. 1浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院心内科,杭州 310016;
    2浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院教育办公室,杭州 310016;
    3浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院下沙院区神经外科,杭州 310016
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-11 发布日期:2023-06-30
  • 通讯作者: 郭洪彬, Email: guohongbin@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省教育厅课程思政教学项目(Y2022E03);浙江省教育厅虚拟仿真实验教学项目(Y2021E02)

Application of narrative medicine in medical science popularization

Lai Dongwu1, Wang Zhengyang2, Guo Hongbin3   

  1. 1Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China;
    2Education Office of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China;
    3Department of Neurosurgery, Xia Sha Campus of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China
  • Received:2022-08-11 Published:2023-06-30
  • Contact: Guo Hongbin, Email: guohongbin@zju.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Curriculum Ideological and Political Teaching Program of the Department of Education of Zhejiang Province(Y2022E03); Virtual Simulation Experiment Teaching Project of the Department of Education of Zhejiang Province(Y2021E02)

PDF (PC)

105

摘要： 目的 探索叙事医学在医学科普教育宣传中的应用效果。方法 在2022年1至2月征集医学科普教育文章120篇。采用试验对照方法,将30篇有医学叙事的科普教育文章作为叙事组,另随机选取30篇没有医学叙事的文章作为非叙事组,分析文章关注词,对两组文章的评分、阅读量和点赞数进行比较。相关数据采用独立样本t检验进行分析。结果 叙事组文章中“困扰”“幸运”“开心”“一家人”等关注词词频较高。叙事组和非叙事组评分分别为(86.90±6.87)分和(80.07±5.86)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001);阅读量分别为(2 807.37±1 278.99)次和(1 832.93±1 150.79)次,点赞量分别为(30.77±6.78)次和(24.53±6.94)次,差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论 叙事医学在医学科普教育宣传中的应用效果良好,在科普文章中体现了医学叙事的特点,且更有利于医患共鸣,促进科普文章的传播。

关键词: 叙述, 叙事医学, 科普教育, 人文

Abstract: Objective To explore the role and characteristics of narrative medicine in science popularization. Methods Among 120 articles on medical science education collected from January to February 2022, 30 popular science articles with medical narrative were selected as the narrative group, and another 30 articles without medical narrative were randomly selected as the non-narrative group. Compare the differences between the two groups in terms of interesting words, scores, reading and ″likes″. The relevant data was analyzed using independent sample t-tests. Results The frequency of words of interest such as ″troubled″, ″lucky″, ″happy″, and ″family″ in the narrative group articles is relatively high. The scores of the narrative group were relatively high, and the scores of the two groups were (86.90±6.87) and (80.07±5.86) respectively, with statistical significance (P < 0.001); The number of reading and ″likes″ of the narrative group were both high, with the reading volume of (2 807.37±1 278.99) and (1 832.93±1 150.79) respectively, and the number of likes of (30.77±6.78) and (24.53±6.94) respectively. The difference were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Conclusions Narrative medicine can be applied to the publicity of medical science popularization, which reflects the narrative characteristics of narrative medicine in popular science articles, and is more conducive to the resonance between doctors and patients, and promotes the dissemination of popular science articles.

Key words: Narration, Narrative medicine, Popular science education, Humanities

中图分类号: