Chinese Journal of Medical Education

Chinese Journal of Medical Education >

2017 , Vol. 37 >Issue 5: 787 - 791

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.05.033

Comparative studies on postdoctoral education between China and America

  • Yang Ting ,
  • Peng Shifang ,
  • Li Qian ,
  • Zhu Xian ,
  • Sun Hong
Expand
  • Human Resources Department,Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,Changsha 410008,China(Yang T, Peng SF, Li Q, Zhu X);
    Hospital Administration Institute, Central South University,Changsha 410008,China(Sun H)

Online published: 2020-12-09

Fold

Abstract

Postdoctoral training started earlier in America, and has relatively mature experience. Based on the analysis and comparison of postdoctoral management mechanism, development scale, funding aid, training quality and effect between China and America, several policy recommendations were put forward,such as establishing the funding mechanism with multi-channel, and stepping up publicity efforts to encourage social financing. Furthermore, the process of postdoctoral training should be perfected to improve the training quality.

Key words： Postdoctoral fellow; Postdoctoral education; Comparative study

Cite this article

Yang Ting , Peng Shifang , Li Qian , Zhu Xian , Sun Hong . Comparative studies on postdoctoral education between China and America[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2017 , 37(5) : 787 -791 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.05.033

References

[1] Alberts B, Kirschner MW, Tilghman S, et al. Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014,111(16):5773-5777. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1404402111.
[2] Ahmed MZ, Plotkin D, Qiu BL, et al. Postdocs in science: a comparison between China and the United States[J]. BioScience, 2015, 65(11):1088-1095.
[3] 王修来, 张伟娜. 美国博士后培养体系研究及对我国的启示[J].黑龙江高教研究,2010(9):68-71. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2614.2010.09.022.
Wang XL, Zhang WN. American postdoctoral research and training system and enlightenment for our country[J].Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education,2010(9):68-71. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2614.2010.09.022.
[4] 温月男.中美博士后制度比较研究[D].沈阳:东北大学, 2010.
[5] 许士荣.我国博士后政策制定的模型分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2009,30(6):73-78.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4519.2009.06.012.
Xu SR. Model analysis of Chinas postdoctoral policy-making[J].Tsinghua Journal of Education, 2009,30(6):73-78. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4519.2009.06.012.
[6] 葛昀洲, 赵文华. 协同创新体制下发达国家校企联培博士后机制研究——以加拿大Mitacs Elevate项目为例[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(23):147-150. DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2015030676.
[7] 张伟娜,王修来.中美博士后发展的结构比较与借鉴[J].黑龙江高教研究,2011(10):16-19.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2614.2011.10.005.
[8] 中国博士后科学基金会.中国博士后科学基金30年[EB/OL]. [2017-02-25]. http://jj.chinapostdoctor.org.cn/V1/Program3/magazine/30year/index.html.
[9] 中国博士后科学基金会.中国博士后基金资助指南[EB/OL].[2017-02-25].http://jj.chinapostdoctor.org.cn/V1/Program3/Info_Show.aspx?InfoID=b615d3f1-e2dd-417e-870e-1643acd41a4c&InfoCategoryID=6&Show=0&rnd=a0df
9488-a0be-4d0f-af96-fc4e1d6ec894.2017-06-01.
[10] 中国博士后.中国博士后制度[EB/OL]. [2017-02-25]. http://www.chinapostdoctor.org.cn/WebSite/program/InfoCate_Show.aspx?INFOCATEGORYID=website001.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉