Medical Education Assessment

Development and reliability and validity test of the current situation and effectiveness evaluation scale of integrated ideological and political education in nursing from students' perspective

  • Wan Lihong ,
  • Pan Junhao ,
  • Zhang Qi ,
  • Wang Xiaodan ,
  • Yang Duoduo ,
  • Li Zhuoran
Expand
  • 1Department of Fundamental Nursing, School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510089, China;
    2Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China;
    3Undergraduate Academic Affairs Office, School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510089, China

Received date: 2024-11-29

  Online published: 2025-09-28

Supported by

The Medical Education Branch of the Chinese Medical Association and the National Medical Education Development Center in 2023 Medical Education Research Key Project(2023A49)

Abstract

Objective To develop the current situation and effectiveness evaluation of integrated ideological and political education (CSEE-IIPE) Scale in nursing from students' perspective.Methods Based on the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model and education ecology theory as the theoretical framework, the initial version of CSEE-IIPE was developed through Delphi expert consultation. From June to July 2024, 1 311 fresh graduates in nursing in 28 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) were surveyed using the convenience sampling method.Results The positive coefficients of consultation with experts was 100.0%, 100.0% and 95.0%; the expert authority coefficient was 0.908. The mean importance scores of items were 4.26~5.00,and the full score ratios were 36.8%~100.0%, the coefficients of variation were 0~0.17, the Kendall's coefficient of harmony was 0.155 (P<0.001). The content validity indexes of item level were 0.95~1.00, and the content validity index of scale level was 0.95. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fit indexes were χ2/df=2.75,CFI=0.952,TLI=0.949,SRMR=0.032,RMSEA=0.037,CR=0.738~0.934,AVE=0.779~0.969,indicating a good fit. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the CSEE-IIPE Scale was 0.990; the split half reliability was 0.963; the retest reliability was 0.797. The CSEE-IIPE Scale included 44 items in 9 dimensions.Conclusions The CSEE-IIPE Scale in nursing from students' perspective has good reliability and validity. It can be used as a reliable tool to objectively evaluate the quality of integrated ideological and political education in nursing major.

Cite this article

Wan Lihong , Pan Junhao , Zhang Qi , Wang Xiaodan , Yang Duoduo , Li Zhuoran . Development and reliability and validity test of the current situation and effectiveness evaluation scale of integrated ideological and political education in nursing from students' perspective[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2025 , 45(10) : 788 -795 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20241129-01231

References

[1] 张荻, 付雯婷, 胡晨玥. 安徽高校新闻传播专业课程思政育人成效研究[J].新闻知识,2022(10):68-74.
[2] 沙金,郑斯斯. 专业思政建设视角下的全员育人体系构建[J]. 黑龙江教师发展学院学报,2023,42(2):4-7. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-8531.2023.02.002.
[3] 曾麒丹, 丁雪梅, 张薇薇, 等. 临床医学、预防医学与护理学专业课程思政教学实践方案的系统评价[J].中华医学教育杂志,2022,42(7):623-627. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220105-00015.
[4] 马孟伟, 王茜, 金莉, 等. 护理本科专业课课程思政教学评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学杂志,2022,37(1):6-10. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2022.01.006.
[5] 周滋霞, 刘洋, 李芳, 等. 基于CIPP模型的高职护理专业课程思政教学评价指标体系的构建[J].卫生职业教育,2023,41(8):49-52. DOI: 10.20037/j.issn.1671-1246.2023.08.16.
[6] 王凡. 教育生态学视域下地方本科院校工程教育人才培养模式改革思考[J].南阳理工学院学报,2022,14(1):90-96. DOI: 10.16827/j.cnki.41-1404/z.2022.01.019.
[7] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253. DOI: 10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2015.02.009.
[8] 马强分, 白令安, 杨金豹. 一流专业背景下课程思政育人体系研究与实践[J]. 教育教学论坛,2022(35):109-112.
[9] 彭柯, 钟朝晖, 刘宴兵. 构建新时代高等医学院校课程思政体系——以重庆医科大学为例[J].中国卫生事业管理,2022,39(10):783-786.
[10] 许清媛, 杨舰, 郭棉, 等. 新时代课程思政实施成效评价:导向、问题与原则[J].广东技术师范大学学报,2022,43(3):94-98. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-402X.2022.03.014.
[11] 齐砚奎. 全课程育人背景下高校课程思政建设的理论思考[J]. 黑龙江高教研究,2020,38(1):124-127. DOI:10.19903/j.cnki.cn23-1074/g.2020.01.025.
[12] 沈丽巍. 教育生态学视角下高校“课程思政”教学评价体系的构建[J].佳木斯大学社会科学学报,2020,38(4):205-207.
[13] 谭红岩, 郭源源, 王娟娟. 高校课程思政评估指标体系的构建与改进[J].教师教育研究,2020,32(5):11-15. DOI: 10.13445/j.cnki.t.e.r.2020.05.002.
[14] 张璐斐. 学校-家庭-社会合力高校思政课育人研究[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,2022: 256-294.
[15] 中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于印发《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的通知[Z]. 2020-05-28.
[16] 王媛媛. 医学量表的编制与评价(理论方法与实例操作)[M]. 北京:北京大学医学出版社,2022: 112-131.
[17] Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling[M]. 4th ed. New York:The Guilford Press,2016: 5-8.
[18] Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables[M]. New York:Jon Wiley & Sons,1989: 02-06.
[19] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务-SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:158-265.
[20] 延芝丽, 杨支兰, 赵慧敏, 等. 老年人内在能力评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志,2024,59(15):1852-1859. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2024.15.009.
[21] 万丽红, 张小培, 潘俊豪, 等. 脑卒中患者健康信念简表的信效度检验[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2017,21(3):303-307. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2017.03.021.
[22] 胡雁, 王志稳. 护理研究[M]. 6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2022:128.
[23] 葛蒲, 杨雅洁, 刘思宇, 等. 工作-家庭冲突量表中文版测评在职父母的效度和信度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志,2023,37(2):145-150. DOI:10. 3969 /j. issn. 1000-6729. 2023. 02. 008.
[24] 任柳, 沈军, 简平, 等. 护理学基础“课程思政”的设计与实践[J]. 中华护理教育,2020,17(7):621-624. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2020.07.010.
[25] 李晓慧, 梁月, 代培方, 等. 我国高校护理专业课程思政研究文献计量分析[J].卫生职业教育,2022,40(5):131-134.
[26] 程赛杰, 孙志强, 龙苏兰. 三全育人视域下课程思政教学改革对护理专业学生职业素质培养的探索[J]. 中国中医药现代远程教育,2022,20(14):173-175. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2779.2022.14.064.
Outlines

/