Objective To establish a quality evaluation indicator system for objective structured clinical examination, in order to inform the evaluation of objective structured clinical examination quality. Methods From April to June 2022, based on the “structure-process-results” three-dimensional quality evaluation model, the preliminary draft of evaluation index was formulated through literature review. Delphi expert consultation was used to conduct consultation with 19 experts, and the weight of each index was determined by analytic hierarchy process. Results The effective recovery rate of the two rounds of expert consultation questionnaire was 100.0%, the expert authority coefficient was 0.892, and the Kendall harmony coefficients was 0.215 and 0.253, respectively. The final quality evaluation indicator system for objective structured clinical examination included 3 first-level indicators, 11 second-level indicators and 56 third-level indicators. Conclusions The quality evaluation indicator system for objective structured clinical examination is comprehensive, scientific and practical, which can inform the evaluation of objective structured clinical examination quality.
Guo Yu
,
Wang Peisong
,
Chen Menghuan
,
Li Shengyun
. Establishment of quality evaluation index system for objective structured clinical examination[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2023
, 43(5)
: 386
-390
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220721-00924
[1] Harden RM, Stevenson M, Downie WW, et al. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination[J]. Br Med J, 1975,1(5955):447-451. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.5955.447.
[2] 仇荣敏, 朱晓萍, 陈旭娟, 等. 客观结构化临床考试在手术室专科护士临床实践能力培养中应用的研究进展[J].中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(28):3696-3700. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.28.031.
[3] Goh HS, Zhang H, Lee CN, et al. Value of nursing objective structured clinical examinations: a scoping review[J]. Nurse Educ, 2019,44(5):E1-E6. DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000620.
[4] Muthusami A, Mohsina S, Sureshkumar S, et al. Efficacy and feasibility of objective structured clinical examination in the internal assessment for surgery postgraduates[J]. J Surg Educ, 2017,74(3):398-405. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.11.004.
[5] Kolivand M, Esfandyari M, Heydarpour S. Examining validity and reliability of objective structured clinical examination for evaluation of clinical skills of midwifery undergraduate students: a descriptive study[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2020,20(1):96. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02017-4.
[6] 朱锋, 吴丽, 杨洁, 等. 客观结构化临床考试在口腔住院医师规范化培训阶段考核中的实施与评价[J].中华医学教育杂志,2020,40(6):467-470. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20190603-00432.
[7] 刘青焱, 韩杰, 田华菊, 等. 结构-过程-结果理论在手术室新护士专科培训管理中的应用[J].现代职业教育,2021,(40):194-195.
[8] 曹红梅, 胡红岩, 顾海, 等. 结构—过程—结果视角下的远程医疗服务质量评价[J].卫生经济研究,2019,36(3):32-35.
[9] 卢佳美, 李维, 廖金莲, 等. 鼻咽癌放化疗患者健康教育效果评价指标体系的构建[J].中华护理杂志,2022,57(8):942-950. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.08.008.
[10] 卢芳燕, 董丽, 刘元, 等. 儿童肝移植围手术期护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J].中华护理杂志,2022,57(6):666-673. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.06.004.
[11] Khan KZ, Ramachandran S, Gaunt K, et al. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part I: an historical and theoretical perspective[J]. Med Teach, 2013,35(9):e1437-1446. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818634.
[12] 蔡立柏, 刘延锦, 郭玉茹, 等. 骨科康复护理质量评价指标的构建[J].中华护理杂志,2021,56(4):508-514. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.04.005.
