Objective To explore advanced blended teaching and evaluate the learning outcomes in obstetrics and gynecology for nursing students from the perspective of ideology and politics. Methods Using the experimental control method. The undergraduates majoring in nursing from 2014 to 2018 in Guangzhou Medical University were selected as the research objects, 179 students enrolled in 2017 and 2018 as the experimental group, and 234 students enrolled in 2014 to 2016 as the control group. The control group adopted classic teaching and the experimental group adopted the advanced blended teaching. The results of examinations and questionnaire survey were collected for evaluating the teaching effect. T-test was used to compare the differences between two groups. Results The mid-term test, probationary medical record report and final theory test of the students in the experimental group were (72.05±15.15),(88.18±15.12) and (73.61±12.37)respectively ,higher than the scores of the control group, which were (62.85±12.52),(84.26±9.74) and (63.53±11.37).The differences were all statistically significant(all P＜0.05). The score of experimental group (85.35±13.81) was lower than that of control group (91.17±7.43) in experimental test, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-5.11,P＜0.001). 81.7% (85/104) of the students in the experimental group considered that the teaching reform model was helpful to study selectively according to their own learning situation and interest. 80.8% (84/104) considered it was helpful to improve the satisfaction of the course, and 77.9% (81/104) considered it was helpful to improve the interest of the course. Conclusions Advanced hybrid teaching from the perspective of ideology and politics can improve the effect of teaching in obstetrics and gynecology for nursing undergraduates, which is generally recognized by students and can be shared by others in nursing education institutes.
Li Jiamei
,
Ren Yulan
,
Yang Yao
,
Su Xi
. Exploration and practice of advanced blended teaching in obstetrics and gynecology for nursing students from the perspective of ideology and politics[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2022
, 42(10)
: 898
-902
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220328-00390
[1] 姜艳,杨怡珂,高磊,刘晓巍.“二孩政策”后不同年龄孕产妇妊娠及分娩现状分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2022,14(4):58-62,114.
[2] 周丽荣. SPOC模式在高职护理教学中的应用现状[J].护理研究,2018,32(1):26-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2018.01.007
[3] 邱伟光. 论课程思政的内在规定与实施重点[J].思想理论教育,2018(8):62-65.DOI: 10.16075/j.cnki.cn31-1220/g4.2018.08.010
[4] 万林艳,姚音竹.“思政课程”与“课程思政”教学内容的同向同行[J].中国大学教学, 2018,(12):52-55.
[5] 翟峥, 王文丽. 基于课程思政链的大学英语混合式教学实践探索——以英语通识课“媒介素养”为例[J].外语电化教学,2021,(6):63-67+10.
[6] 管栋良,束蝉方,李明峰.新工科和课程思政背景下的数字测图原理与方法课程教学改革[J]. 测绘通报,2022,(01):99-103.DOI:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2022.0523
[7] 吴斌, 陈素清, 吴沛霖. 基于“儿科学”知识模块课程思政的构建及实现途径[J].中国大学教学,2021,(10):49-54.
[8] 乔永丽, 闫俊萍, 郭桂英, 等. 基于课程思政理念混合式教学在基础护理学实训教学中的应用研究[J].护理研究,2021,35(24):4471-4474. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.24.025
[9] 冯蓉, 许红, 夏立平. 高职妇产科护理课程"理实结合"思政育人方案的设计与实践[J].中华护理教育,2021,18(11):989-993. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.11.005
[10] 张巍, 李昆, 张金勇, 等. 认知参与度视角下妇产科护理学混合式教学模式构建与实践[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(18):63-66,72. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.18.063
[11] 朱永海. 深度学习视角下混合教学系统化设计与体系化模式构建[J].中国电化教育,2021,(11):77-87.
[12] 李中华,刘翠芬.基于学习进阶的高校思政课程资源开发初探[J].黑龙江高教研究,2022, 40(2):110-5.DOI:10.19903/j.cnki.cn23-1074/g.2022.02.015
[13] Ibrahim NI, Bohm L, Roche JS, et al. Creating a 'choose your topic' massive open online course: an innovative and flexible approach to delivering injury prevention education[J]. Med Educ Online, 2021,26(1):1955646. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1955646.
[14] Guo Y, Liu H, Hao A, et al. Blended learning model via small private online course improves active learning and academic performance of embryology[J]. Clin Anat, 2022,35(2):211-221. DOI: 10.1002/ca.23818.
[15] Jarrett-Thelwell FD, Burke JR, Poirier JN, et al. A comparison of student performance and satisfaction between a traditional and integrative approach to teaching an introductory radiology course on the extremities[J]. J Chiropr Educ, 2019,33(1):21-29. DOI: 10.7899/JCE-17-26.
[16] Vallée A, Blacher J, Cariou A, et al. Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2020,22(8):e16504. DOI: 10.2196/16504.
