Objective To investigate and analyze the situation of midwifery skills on dystocia among employees from different hospitals and related medical staff in Zhejiang Province. Methods Totally 1 162 in-service staff from 154 hospitals in Zhejiang Province in 2021 joined the project in 2021. Chi-squared test was used to compare the situation of midwifery skills on dystocia from different hospitals. The results were expected to improve the management capacity on dystocia for midwives in these hospitals. Results Among the 154 hospitals, the overall conducting rates of midwifery skills were different, management of shoulder dystocia and forceps operation/fetal head absorption were most likely to be provided by hospitals [with the proportions as 54.5% (84/154), 55.2% (85/154), respectively], and other skills were less provided; and the conducting rate of three midwifery skills were higher in Level-III hospitals than those in Level-II hospitals, including forceps operation/fetal head absorption[68.0%(51/75) vs. 43.9%(29/66)], vaginal delivery of twins[29.3%(22/75)vs. 7.6%(5/66)] and abdominal version for breech presentation [36.0%(27/75) vs.12.1%(8/66)], the differences of were all significant (P<0.05). As for midwives and obstetricians, the mastery rates of different skills varied. However, 26.7%(310/1 162) of them actually do not master any skills. Conclusions The conducting rates of midwifery skills on dystocia were not satisfying among hospitals in Zhejiang Province, and the managing capacity for dystocia of the midwives and obstetricians needs to be improved, the measures should include reasonable resources allocation, supporting first and second-level hospitals, strengthening the standardized training and clinical practice of midwives based on an individualized strategy for midwives with different training experience.
Su Chang
,
Zhou Menglin
,
Chen Danqing
. Current situation of the midwifery skills on dystocia among 154 hospitals in Zhejiang Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2022
, 42(7)
: 665
-669
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20211025-01311
[1] 张为远, 侯磊. 中国大陆剖宫产状况大数据调查的启示[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2018,34(1):38-40. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2018010110.
[2] 余昕烊, 漆洪波. 低位产钳助产术[J].中华产科急救电子杂志,2018,7(3):144-147. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2018.03.005.
[3] 王乔颖. B超监护下臀位外倒转术降低剖宫产率的效果观察[J].浙江临床医学,2019,21(4):533-534.
[4] Petrovska K, Watts NP, Catling C, et al. Supporting women planning a vaginal breech birth: an international survey[J]. Birth, 2016,43(4):353-357. DOI: 10.1111/birt.12249.
[5] Practice Bulletin No 178: Shoulder Dystocia[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2017,129(5):e123-e133. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002043.
[6] von Kaisenberg C, Klaritsch P, Ochsenbein-Kölble N, et al. Screening, management and delivery in twin pregnancy[J]. Ultraschall Med, 2021,42(4):367-378. DOI: 10.1055/a-1248-8896.
[7] 陈慕刁. 从助产士角度探讨产程中医疗纠纷的防范[J].中国实用护理杂志,2008,24(30):53-54. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2008.30.030.
[8] 杨根梦, 洪仕君, 何亚超, 等. 151例孕产妇和新生儿死亡的医疗纠纷案例分析[J].昆明医科大学学报,2018,39(11):118-123. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4706.2018.11.027.
[9] 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 剖宫产手术的专家共识(2014)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,49(10):721-724. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2014.10.001.
[10] 尹爱兰, 胡海燕, 钟梅. 美国妇产科医师学会臀位外倒转指南(2016)解读[J].妇产与遗传(电子版),2016,6(4):26-30.