Chinese Journal of Medical Education

Chinese Journal of Medical Education >

2018 , Vol. 38 >Issue 3: 380 - 383

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.03.015

Construction research of the meta-evaluation index system for the university curriculum evaluation

  • Liu Cheng ,
  • Yu Chihui ,
  • Cai Jingyi
Expand
  • Institute of Medical Education, Department of Education, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China (Liu C); Teaching and Learning Center, Department of Education, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China (Yu CH); Department of Education, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China (Cai JY)

Received date: 2017-12-21

  Online published: 2020-12-08

Fold

Abstract

The courses teaching and learning quality is the core of higher education quality. How to guarantee the curriculum evaluation can be scientific, efficient, and reasonably implemented, is an important issue of quality assurance of higher education. This paper introduces the concept of meta-evaluation, and on the basis of the theories of meta-evaluation and curriculum evaluation, refers to the related literatures and experience as well as suggestions, constructs the index system for the university curriculum evaluation. It also puts forward three implementation suggestions, that is, pay attention to the overall process monitoring of curriculum evaluation; choose the appropriate subject of meta-evaluation; explore the applicable institution of meta-evaluation.

Key words： Curriculum evaluation; Meta-evaluation; Index system

Cite this article

Liu Cheng , Yu Chihui , Cai Jingyi . Construction research of the meta-evaluation index system for the university curriculum evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2018 , 38(3) : 380 -383 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.03.015

References

[1] Scriven M.An introduction to meta-evaluation[J]. Educ Prod Rep, 1969,51(32):36-38.
[2] Stufflebeam DL.A meta-evaluation[R]. Kalamazoo:Western Michigan University, School of Education,1974: 159-161.
[3] 钟启泉.走向人性化的课程评价[J]. 全球教育展望,2010,39(1):8-14,20.
Zhong QQ.Towards humanized curriculum evaluation[J]. Global Education,2010,39(1):8-14,20.
[4] 王根顺,郝路军.高等学校课程评价元评价探析[J]. 高等理科教育,2007(2):9-12. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4076.2007.02.003.
Wang GS, Hao LJ.Evaluation of courses in universities and colleges[J]. Higher Education of Sciences,2007(2):9-12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4076.2007.02.003.
[5] 杨滨辉.我国高校内部教学评估体系的元评估研究[D]. 哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2009.
[6] 郑文.关于高校教师课堂教学质量元评价及其机制初探[J]. 现代大学教育,2002(2):57-60. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1610.2002.02.019.
Zheng W.A discussion of meta-evaluation and mechanism of classroom instruction’s quality evaluation in colleges and universities[J]. Modern University Education,2002(2):57-60. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1610.2002.02.019.
[7] American Evaluation Association.The program evaluation standards[EB/OL]. (2016-08-03)[2017-12-20]. http://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=103.
[8] 程艳霞.基础教育质量监测的元评估体系[J]. 教育测量与评价(理论版),2015(7):15-19. DOI:10.16518/j.cnki.emae.2015.07.004.
[9] 田腾飞,刘任露.元评估——教育评估专业化发展之必需[J]. 外国教育研究,2014,41(6):111-119.
[10] 王云峰,张庆文,曲霏,等.高等教育元评估理论模式探析[J]. 高教发展与评估,2008,24(2):30-36. DOI:10.3963/j.issn.1672-8742.2008.02.006.
Wang YF,Zhang QW,Qu F,et al.Higher educational meta-evaluation theoretical pattern[J]. Higher Education Development and Evaluation,2008,24(2):30-36. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1672-8742.2008.02.006.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉