The exploration on a comprehensive evaluation method for clinical doctors

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.05.033

Chinese Journal of Medical Education ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 782-786.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.05.033

Previous Articles Next Articles

The exploration on a comprehensive evaluation method for clinical doctors

Li Xinbao, Zhao Dongbing, Li Ziyu, Li Yan

Department of Oncology of Capital Medical University & Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China (Lin YL, Ji ZH, Li XB, Li Y); Department of Pancreatic-Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center & Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Zhao DB); Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China (Li ZY)

Received:2018-01-28 Online:2018-10-01 Published:2020-12-09
Contact: Li Yan, Email: liyansd2@163.com
Supported by:
Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals' Ascent Plan (DFL20180701);Beijing Municipal Grant for Medical Talents Group on Peritoneal Surface Oncology (2017400003235J007)

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To establish a comprehensive method to evaluate clinical doctors, by which the quality of clinical doctor could be assessed comprehensively, objectively and precisely. Methods Taking clinical oncologists as the study sample, a total of 13 doctors from Cancer Center of Beijing Shijitan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University were evaluated on 5-dimensional key parameters in this study, including clinical work, scientific research, medical education, popular medical science education to the public and daily work performance. The score of each dimension and an integrated score were collected. Radar chart methodology was used to analyze the doctors' comprehensive quality, based on the score collected. Results The overall median integrated score for the whole study population was 36.5. The integrated scores of academic leaders, backbone doctors and main force doctors were 122.6, 39.7 and 31.2 respectively. Academic leader got relatively high score in each dimension, especially in scientific research. The comprehensive quality among the 3 levels of doctors is not balanced, which shows the reality of daily performance. Conclusions The 5-dimensional comprehensive evaluation system combined with radar chart methodology for oncologist can reflect the comprehensive quality of 13 doctors in daily work. This comprehensive evaluation method contributes to Objective evaluation of doctors' comprehensive quality, as well as providing reliable evidence for medical talent cultivation.

Key words: Clinical doctors, Comprehensive evaluation, Radar chart

Li Xinbao, Zhao Dongbing, Li Ziyu, Li Yan. The exploration on a comprehensive evaluation method for clinical doctors[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2018, 38(5): 782-786.

References

[1] 徐袁瑾, 曹霞, 周春艳, 等. 口腔医学人才素质测评指标体系构建[J]. 解放军医院管理杂志, 2015(1):28-29. DOI:10.16770/j.cnki.1008-9985.2015.01.018.
Xu YJ, Cao X, Zhou CY, et al.Establishment of stomatology doctor quality assessment system[J]. Hosp Admin J Chin PLA, 2015(1):28-29. DOI:10.16770/j.cnki.1008-9985.2015.01.018.
[2] 王柯亮, 张蕾, 张光鹏. 我国卫生人才评价现状与对策[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2011, 4(12):6-9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2982.2011.12.002.
Wang KL, Zhang L, Zhang GP. Status quo and countermeasures of health professional evaluation in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 2011, 4(12):6-9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2982.2011.12.002.
[3] 张瑜, 吴涛, 刘凯燕, 等. 医学科研人才评价管理制度的探讨[J]. 中国病案, 2017, 18(7):81-83. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2566.2017.07.029.
Zhang Y, Wu T, Liu KY, et al. Discussion on the evaluation and management institutions of medical scientific talents[J]. Chinese Medical Record, 2017,18(7):81-83. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2566.2017.07.029.
[4] 孔翊翌, 黄鹤冲, 翟理详, 等. 对中医医院高层次人才培养基本框架设计的评价与思考[J]. 中国社会医学杂志, 2016, 33(5):429-431.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5625.2016.05.009.
Kong YY, Huang HC, Zhai LX, et al. Design and thinking about the basic frame for evaluation on cultivation of high-level talents of TCM hospital[J]. Chinese Journal of Social Medicine, 2016,33(5):429-431. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5625.2016.05.009.
[5] 朱智威, 朱亚鑫, 白雪, 等. 雷达图在医学教学质量评价中的应用[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2017(7):42-43. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2017.07.021.
[6] 杜晓静, 刘娜, 张宏. 雷达图在医院统计分析中的应用[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2011,18(8):748,764. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9985.2011.08.020.
[7] 郭鹏军, 郭鹏辉, 吴晨曦, 等. “雷达图”分析法在医院绩效评价中的应用[J].中国医药导报,2009,6(22):171-172. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7210.2009.22.104.
Guo PJ, Guo PH, Wu CX, et al. Application of radar chart in hospital performance evaluation[J]. China Medical Hearald, 2009, 6(22):171-172. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7210.2009.22.104.
[8] 李攀, 雷二庆. 科技人才评价新框架探索——以某军事医学科研机构为例[J]. 军事医学,2015,39(12):904-908. DOI: 10.7644/j.issn.1674-9960.2015.12.004.
Li P, Lei EQ. Exploration of a new evaluation framework for talented professionals in science and technology: A case study on an institution of military medical sciences[J]. Military Medical Sciences, 2015, 39(12):904-908. DOI: 10.7644/j.issn.1674-9960.2015.12.004.
[9] 刘小康, 蔡景一, 王海俊. 应用优序图法确定医学本科生一般能力评价指标体系的研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志,2017,37(5):749-752. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.05.024.
Liu XK, Cai JY, Wang HJ. Using precedence chart to determine index of medical undergraduates' general ability[J]. Chin J Med Edu, 2017, 37(5):749-752. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.05.024.
[10] 唐群, 吴华, 雷久士, 等. 积分制在病理学教学中的应用及其效果评价[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2016, 36(4):625-628. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2016.04.035.
Tang Q, Wu H, Lei JS, et al. Application and evaluation of credit system in the teaching of pathology[J]. Chin J Med Edu, 2016, 36(4):625-628. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2016.04.035.
[11] 鲁娟, 史晓莹, 刘斌. 医科研究生创新能力定性与定量分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2016, 36(4):597-600,605. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2016.04.029.
Lu J, Shi XY, Liu B. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of medical postgraduate students' innovation[J]. Chin J Med Edu, 2016, 36(4):597-600,605.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2016.04.029.

The exploration on a comprehensive evaluation method for clinical doctors

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments