Comparison between process assessment and outcome assessment in clinical medical education

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.02.031

Chinese Journal of Medical Education ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 304-307.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.02.031

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparison between process assessment and outcome assessment in clinical medical education

Qi Xin

Department of Plastic Surgery & Burns, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China

Received:2017-06-04 Online:2018-04-01 Published:2020-12-08
Supported by:
Special Subject of Director’s Fund of Peking University Health Science Center (2017JJ09)

Abstract

Abstract: Clinical medical education assessment can be divided into process assessment and outcome assessment. By comparing the similarities and differences between the two assessment methods, the applicable scope advantages and shortcomings of two methods in clinical medical education were expounded, and their dialectical relationship was explored. At different stages of clinical medical education, process assessment and outcome assessment have different advantages. By discussing the application weight of two methods in different stages, the development of clinical medical education was promoted step by step.

Key words: Process assessment, Outcome assessment, Clinical medical education

Qi Xin. Comparison between process assessment and outcome assessment in clinical medical education[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2018, 38(2): 304-307.

References

[1] 高凌飚, 钟媚.过程性评价:概念、范围与实施[J].上海教育科研, 2005(9):12-14, 59. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2020.2005.09.004.
Gao LB, Zhong M.Process evaluation:Ideas, spectrum and implementation[J].Shanghai Research on Education, 2005(9):12-14, 59. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2020.2005.09.004.
[2] 梁春琳.学习主体自我过程性评价的认知缺失与策略建构[J].广西社会科学, 2012(11):186-188. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6917.2012.11.043.
[3] Anderson DD, Long S, Thomas GW, et al.Objective structured assessments of technical skills(OSATS)does not assess the quality of the surgical result effectively[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2016, 474(4):874-881. DOI:10.1007/s11999-015-4603-4.
[4] 齐心, 翟伟, 张道俭, 等.基于结果的住院医师石膏固定术考核方法的探讨[J].中华医学教育杂志, 2017, 37(1):129-133. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.01.028.
Qi X, Zhai W, Zhang DJ, et al.A study on the outcome-based assessment of plaster fixation of residents[J].Chin J Med Edu, 2017, 37(1):129-133. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.01.028.
[5] Xin Q, Lian D, Wei Z, et al.A novel approach to assess clinical competence of postgraduate year 1 surgery residents[J].Med Educ Online, 2017, 22(1):1342523.
[6] 苗耘, 刘莉, 张艳萍.“以结果为基础”的教育在医学教育中的应用——美国威斯康星大学成功应用ACGME能力模型的经验和启示[J].复旦教育论坛, 2011, 9(5):92-96. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0059.2011.05.018
Miao Y, Liu L, Zhang YP.The application of “outcome-based education” in medical education.Fudan Education Forum, 2011, 9(5):92-96. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0059.2011.05.018
[7] 李文惠, 陈校云, 李祥文, 等.美国milestone住院医师胜任力评价系统及启示[J].中华医学教育探索杂志, 2014, 13(9):884-888. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2014.09.006.
Li WH, Chen XY, Li XW, et al.The enlightenment of USA physician competency evaluation framework: Milestone for our physician training[J].Chin J Med Edu Res, 2014, 13(9):884-888. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2014.09.006.
[8] 齐心, 刘占兵, 李海潮, 等.第一年外科住院医师客观结构化临床考试的实施及评价[J].中华医学教育探索杂志, 2017, 16(1):12-16. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2017.01.003.
Qi X, Liu ZB, Li HC, et al.Implementation and evaluation of objective structured clinical examination for postgraduate year 1 surgery residents[J].Chin J Med Edu Res, 2017, 16(1):12-16. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2017.01.003.
[9] Chauvin SW.Applying educational theory to simulation-based training and assessment in surgery[J].Surg Clin North Am, 2015, 95(4):695-715. DOI:10.1016/j.suc.2015.04.006.
[10] Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y.Amending Miller’s Pyramid to include professional identity formation[J].Acad Med, 2016, 91(2):180-185. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000913.
[11] 姜艳华.试论过程性评价与结果性评价的同一[J].当代教育论坛, 2007(8):52-53. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8305.2007.08.021.

Comparison between process assessment and outcome assessment in clinical medical education

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 3

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Li Honghe, David A Hirsh, Tara A Singh, Yamini Saravanan, Rachel Hathaway, Bianca Shagrin, Elizabeth Gaufberg, Arundhati Ghosh, Liu Jun, Li Chloe, Wen Deliang. Longitudinal integrated clerkships in developed countries and their inspiration for Chinese medical education [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2020, 40(9): 748-698.
[2]	Cong Xin, Zhang Yan, Xu Hai, Liu Limei, Zheng Ming, Xiang Ruolan, Cai Jingyi, Wu Liling. Investigation and analysis of the implementation effect of “process assessment + final assessment” assessment system in pathophysiology teaching based on the perspective of students [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2020, 40(8): 637-640.
[3]	Zhang Yan, Xu Hai, Liu Limei, Cong Xin, Liu Junchang, Cai Jingyi, Wu Liling. Exploration of process assessment system based on the network tool “SOJUMP” in pathophysiology teaching [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2018, 38(3): 384-387.