Chinese Journal of Medical Education ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 637-640.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20191011-00842

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Investigation and analysis of the implementation effect of “process assessment + final assessment” assessment system in pathophysiology teaching based on the perspective of students

Cong Xin1, Zhang Yan1, Xu Hai1, Liu Limei1, Zheng Ming1, Xiang Ruolan1, Cai Jingyi2, Wu Liling1   

  1. 1Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Peking University School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China;
    2Department of Education, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2019-10-11 Online:2020-08-01 Published:2020-12-08
  • Contact: Wu Liling, Email:pathophy@bjmu.edu.cn, Tel: 0086-10-82802403
  • Supported by:
    2017 Research Fund for Education and Teaching Reform of Peking University Health Science Center(2017JJ11)

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the “process assessment + final assessment” assessment system in pathophysiology from the perspective of students.Methods A total of 570 students from Peking University in clinical medicine, basic medicine, stomatology, preventive medicine, medical English, nursing and medical experiments in 2016 were selected as the research objects,we conducted a questionnaire survey from multiple aspects,including assessment effect,assessment content and performance,self-writing scenario simulation or case analysis questions,and impact on learning pathophysiology.Results 95.0% (541/570) students suggested to continue to use “process assessment + final assessment” in the course of pathophysiology in the future;92.9%(530/570)students believed that the assessment methods of case analysis and situational multiple choice questions played a role in understanding and using theoretical knowledge; 88.9% (507/570) students agreed with the assessment methods of situational multiple choice questions or case analysis written by their classmates. The novel assessment system not only helps students to review and consolidate basic knowledge (6.97), analyze problems with learned knowledge (4.64), and integrate basic and clinical knowledge (3.94), but also helps to improve students' abilities of autonomous learning (2.58) and team cooperation (1.42).Conclusions Students think that a reasonable and effective assessment and evaluation system will provide solid foundation to improve student attainment.

Key words: Process assessment, Pathophysiology, Questionnaire, Based on the perspective of students

CLC Number: