医学教育评估

头戴式记录仪在临床操作技能评价中的信度研究

  • 刘嘉祯 ,
  • 陆耀红 ,
  • 邹扬 ,
  • 王洪 ,
  • 王道珍 ,
  • 李萍
展开
  • 200233 上海市第六人民医院教学办公室

网络出版日期: 2020-12-09

基金资助

中华医学会医学教育分会和中国高等教育学会医学教育专业委员会2016年医学教育研究课题(2016B-PG021)

Reliability research on the wearable recording equipment applied in the clinical skill evaluation

  • Liu Jiazhen ,
  • Lu Yaohong ,
  • Zou Yang ,
  • Wang Hong ,
  • Wang Daozhen ,
  • Li ping
Expand
  • Teaching Department, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200233, China

Online published: 2020-12-09

摘要

目的 研究头戴式记录仪在医学操作技能评价中的信度。方法 运用头戴式记录仪对39名学生的外科操作技能考核过程进行录像,3名考官进行现场评分及录像评分,通过比较现场评分及录像评分,得出头戴式记录仪考核的复本信度、评分者信度和重测信度。 结果 头戴式记录仪考核的复本信度、评分者信度和重测信度较高。结论 头戴式记录仪运用在临床操作技能评价中的信度较高,能够在不影响考生的情况下,捕捉到考生在技能操作中的细节,是一种可以实现异时异地评分的远程医学考试设备。

本文引用格式

刘嘉祯 , 陆耀红 , 邹扬 , 王洪 , 王道珍 , 李萍 . 头戴式记录仪在临床操作技能评价中的信度研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2017 , 37(6) : 952 -955 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.06.032

Abstract

Objective To study the reliability of wearable recording equipment used in the medical operation skills evaluation.Methods The wearable recording equipment were used to record 39 students' medical operation skill performance in a test, 3 examiners give score through watching the video. 1 of the 3 examiners does the on-site evaluation as well. Through the comparison of on-site score and video score, to test copy reliability, rater reliability and test-retest reliability of the wearable recording equipment.Results The copy reliability (0.486), rater reliability (0.934 and 0.611) and test-retest reliability (0.918 and 0.903) are high.Conclusions Without the influence on the students, the equipment can capture more details of their performance. With the help of the record, the examiners can evaluate the students in a different time and difference place.

参考文献

[1] 卢燕, 续岩, 马俊红, 等. 基于医学生视角的客观结构化临床考试评价[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2014, 34(4): 624-628. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2014.04.044.
Lu Y, Xu Y, Ma JH, et al. The evaluation of objective structured clinical examination based on students' perspective[J]. Chin J Med Edu, 2014, 34(4): 624-628. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2014.04.044.
[2] 景汇泉, 张颖, 韩松, 等. 国家医师资格实践技能考试合格标准设置探析[J].中华医学教育杂志, 2014, 34(3): 466-469. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2014.03.042.
Jing HQ, Zhang Y, Han S, et al. Exploration of the establishment of qualified standard for clinical skill test of national medical licensing examination[J]. Chin J Med Edu, 2014, 34(3): 466-469. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2014.03.042.
[3] 贾同英, 袁蕙芸. 多院区医院管理难点与对策探析[J].中国医院, 2014(8):28-30.
Jia TY, Yuan HY. Analysis on management difficulties and its countermeasures on multi-campuses hospitals[J]. Chinese Hospitals, 2014 (8):28-30.
[4] Kneebone R, Bello F, Nestel D, et al. Learner-centred feedback using remote assessment of clinical procedures[J]. Med Teach, 2008, 30(8): 795-801. DOI: 10.1080/01421590801949941.
[5] Lentz LM, Fincher RM. Using telemedicine and standardized patients to evaluate off-campus students' skills[J]. Acad Med, 1999, 74(5): 598-599.
[6] Parish SJ, Weber CM, Steiner-Grossman P, et al. Teaching clinical skills through videotape review: A randomized trial of group versus individual reviews[J]. Teach Learn Med, 2006, 18(2): 92-98. DOI: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1802_1.
[7] 重测信度的概念及使用注意事项[J]. 中国护理管理, 2016, 16(12): 1612-1612. Chinese Nursing Management,2016,16(12):1612.
[8] 王远库. 关于个体记忆增长与记忆遗忘的数学模型[J]. 榆林学院学报, 2007, 17(4): 31-32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3871.2007.04.011.
[9] 一帆.复本信度[J].教育测量与评价(理论版), 2015(3): 64.
文章导航

/