教学方法

线上线下混合式教学方法在临床研究方法学课程中的应用

  • 褚水莲 ,
  • 冯琳 ,
  • 张迪 ,
  • 李嘉琛 ,
  • 左颖婷 ,
  • 景行 ,
  • 梁立荣
展开
  • 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院 北京市呼吸疾病研究所临床流行病学研究室,北京 100020

收稿日期: 2023-03-30

  网络出版日期: 2023-11-27

基金资助

首都医科大学2022年教育教学改革研究课题(2022JYY200);2022年北京市重点专科建设项目(流行病学)(20221008)

Application of the online-offline hybrid teaching method in clinical research methodology courses

  • Chu Shuilian ,
  • Feng Lin ,
  • Zhang Di ,
  • Li Jiachen ,
  • Zuo Yingting ,
  • Jing Hang ,
  • Liang Lirong
Expand
  • Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China

Received date: 2023-03-30

  Online published: 2023-11-27

Supported by

Education and Teaching Project Reform of Capital Medical University in 2022 (2022JYY200); 2022 Beijing Key Specialists in Major Epidemic Prevention and Control (Epidemiology)(20221008)

摘要

临床研究方法学课程重在培养临床研究设计实践能力,但传统授课侧重于理论教学,难以达到预期效果。线上线下混合式教学方法,通过多元化、动态、跨空间教学,有助于实践能力培养。本研究以首都医科大学研究生临床研究方法学课程为例,阐述该教学方法在此类课程教学中的设计和实施,并采用过程性评价和问卷调查评价教学效果。结果显示,课程结束后,学生理论知识水平[(24.0±1.9)分比(18.1±4.7)分]、研究设计要素拆解[(8.6±1.9)分比(4.9±2.7)分]、科研计划书[(77.2±16.2)分比(54.9±21.7)分]和研究方案汇报幻灯[(90.6±2.9)分比(83.4±4.2)分]得分均高于授课前,其差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。64名学生中,60名(93.8%)学生认为该教学方法能够提高其临床研究设计能力,教学满意度评分为(18.1±0.7)分。可见,线上线下混合式教学方法有助于提高学生的临床研究方法学理论水平和临床研究设计实践能力,取得了较好的教学效果。

本文引用格式

褚水莲 , 冯琳 , 张迪 , 李嘉琛 , 左颖婷 , 景行 , 梁立荣 . 线上线下混合式教学方法在临床研究方法学课程中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023 , 43(12) : 912 -915 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230330-00337

Abstract

The clinical research methodology course focuses on cultivating practical abilities in clinical research design, but the traditional teaching method focuses on knowledge, which is difficult to achieve the expected effects. The online-offline hybrid teaching method helps to cultivate practical abilities through diversified, dynamic, and cross spatial teaching. This study took the clinical research methodology course for graduate student of Capital Medical University as an example, to describe the design and implementation process of this teaching method in this kind of course, and to evaluate its effectiveness by process assessment and questionnaire survey. After the course, the scores of theoretical knowledge [(24.0±1.9) to (18.1±4.7)] and research design elements [(8.6±1.9) to (4.9±2.7)] were higher than those before the course, and the scores of clinical research protocols [(77.2±16.2) to (54.9±21.7)] and research proposal presentation slides [(90.6±2.9) to (83.4±4.2)] were also significantly increased (all P<0.05). Out of 64 students, 60(93.8%) believed that this teaching method could improve their clinical research design ability, and the average satisfaction score was (18.1±0.7). The results showed that the online-offline hybrid teaching method can increase the students′ theoretical knowledge level and improve their practical abilities of clinical research design, and favorable learning effect has been achieved.

参考文献

[1] 何燕, 杨兴华, 刘芬. 《临床流行病学》在临床医学专业七年制本科生的教学调查与分析[J].继续医学教育,2015,(3):47-49. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2015.03.028.
[2] 梅虹霞,胡明品,黄葱葱,等. 线上线下混合式教学方法在临床麻醉学教学中的应用研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志,2019,39(11):843-846. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.11.010.
[3] 周芙玲,于佳宁,商豫凤,等. 线上线下混合式教学及其过程管理在临床医学硕士专业学位研究生培养中的探索[J]. 中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(9):849-853. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210122-00104.
[4] Brown P, Brunnhuber K, Chalkidou K, et al. How to formulate research recommendations[J]. BMJ, 2006,333(7572):804-806. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38987.492014.94.
[5] Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, et al. Facilitating small group learning in the health professions[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2020,20(Suppl 2):457. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02282-3.
[6] Voutilainen A, Pitkäaho T, Kvist T, et al. How to ask about patient satisfaction? The visual analogue scale is less vulnerable to confounding factors and ceiling effect than a symmetric Likert scale[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2016, 72(4):946-57. DOI:10.1111/jan.12875.
文章导航

/