护理教育

护理学跨专业教育研究的可视化分析

  • 王慧 ,
  • 周利华 ,
  • 李紫夜 ,
  • 延雪晴
展开
  • 1安徽医科大学护理学院2020级护理学专业硕士研究生,合肥 230032;
    2安徽医科大学护理学院妇科教研办公室,合肥 230032

收稿日期: 2023-02-06

  网络出版日期: 2023-07-31

基金资助

安徽高校自然科学研究项目(KJ2021A0254);安徽医科大学护理学院科研基金重点培育项目(hlpy2021005)

Visual analysis of research about interprofessional education of nursing

  • Wang Hui ,
  • Zhou Lihua ,
  • Li Ziye ,
  • Yan Xueqing
Expand
  • 1Master Degree Candidate, Nursing Major, Enrolled in 2020, Graduate School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China;
    2Office of Gynecology Teaching and Research, School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China

Received date: 2023-02-06

  Online published: 2023-07-31

Supported by

Anhui University Natural Science Research Project(KJ2021A0254); Key Cultivation Project of Scientific Research Fund of Nursing School of Anhui Medical University(hlpy2021005)

摘要

目的 对护理学跨专业教育(interprofessional education,IPE)相关研究的主要热点与研究趋势进行可视化分析。方法 系统检索Web of Science数据库中核心合集文献,应用Citespace软件对护理领域内IPE文献的分布特征、研究热点和趋势进行分析。结果 2013至2022年护理领域IPE研究共发文644篇,分布于133篇期刊,来自48个国家的900个研究机构。研究热点为IPE、护理学生、团队合作、协作和态度,准备和工具为新兴研究方向。研究分为2013至2016年的初步尝试、2016至2019年的理论研究和2019至2022年的能力培养与模式创新的3个阶段。结论 护理IPE研究区域分布不均衡,护理学专业学生的跨专业培养是当前研究热点,前期准备和教学模式为研究前沿。

本文引用格式

王慧 , 周利华 , 李紫夜 , 延雪晴 . 护理学跨专业教育研究的可视化分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023 , 43(8) : 570 -573 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230206-00102

Abstract

Objective Visualization analysis of major hotspots, and research trends of interprofessional education (IPE) in the field of nursing. Methods Systematically search the core ensemble of literature in the Web of Science database, and apply Citespace software to analyze the distribution characteristics, research hotspots and trends of IPE literature within the nursing field. Results A total of 644 articles were published in IPE research in nursing from 2013 to 2022, distributed across 133 journals 900 research institutions from 48 countries. The research hotspots were IPE, nursing students, teamwork, collaboration and attitude, with preparation and tools as emerging research directions. The study was divided into 3 phases of preliminary attempts from 2013 to 2016, theoretical research from 2016 to 2019, and competence development and model innovation from 2019 to 2022. Conclusions Nursing IPE research is unevenly distributed regionally, the interprofessional training of nursing students is a current research hotspot, with research frontiers focusing on the pre-preparation and teaching model.

参考文献

[1] Reeves S, Fletcher S, Barr H, et al. A BEME systematic review of theeffects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39[J]. Med Teach, 2016,38(7):656-668. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173663.
[2] Paradis E,Pipher M, Cartmill C, et al. Articulating the ideal: 50 years of interprofessional collaboration in Medical Education[J]. Med Educ, 2017,51(8):861-872. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13331.
[3] Learning together to work together for health. Report of a WHO Study Group onMultiprofessional Education of Health Personnel: the Team Approach[J]. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, 1988,769:1-72.
[4] 李云玲, 李姗姗, 李意等. 跨专业教育在医护教学中的应用进展[J].牡丹江医学院学报,2020,41(4):163-166. DOI:10.13799/j.cnki.mdjyxyxb.2020.04.045.
[5] 李雯颖. 跨专业教育在护理教学中的应用进展[J].护理学报,2018,25(4):27-31. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.04.027.
[6] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2015.02.009.
[7] 陈睿, 刘义兰, 吴松梅, 等. 基于citespace的国内护理人文关怀研究的可视化分析. 护士进修杂志, 2019, 34(14):1276-1282. DOI: 10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2019.14.006.
[8] 陈悦,陈超美,胡志刚,等.引文空间分析原理与应用.北京:科学出版社,2014:76.
[9] Labrague LJ, McEnroe-Petitte DM, Fronda DC, et al. Interprofessional simulation in undergraduate nursing program: an integrative review[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2018,67:46-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.001.
[10] Roepke A, D'Ambrosia S, Harmon M, et al. Does it make a difference? exploring the value of combining public health and nursing education. J Prof Nurs, 2021, 37(2):261-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.12.007.
[11] Hays LH, Beverly C. Leadership, health systems and policy: Doctoraleducation and integrated clinical application[J]. J Prof Nurs, 2021,37(2):281-285. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.12.009.
[12] Iyasere CA, Wing J, Martel JN, et al. Effect of increased interprofessional familiarity on team performance, communication, and psychological safety on inpatient medical teams: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Intern Med, 2022,182(11):1190-1198. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.4373.
[13] Sheffer Hilel G, Drach-Zahavy A, Endevelt R. The paradoxical effects of professional stereotypes on the quality of care by interprofessional teams: the contingent effects of team faultlines, team stereotypes, and championship behaviors[J]. Front Psychol, 2023,14:1135071. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1135071.
[14] vanDiggele C, Roberts C, Burgess A, et al. Interprofessional education: tips for design and implementation[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2020,20(Suppl 2):455. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02286-z.
[15] Rutherford-Hemming T, Lioce L. State of interprofessional education in nursing: A systematic review. Nurse Educ, 2018, 43(1):9-13. DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000405.
[16] Mahlknecht A, Krisch L, Nestler N, et al. Impact of training and structured medication review on medication appropriateness and patient-related outcomes in nursing homes: results from the interventional study intherAKT. BMC Geriatr, 2019, 19(1):257. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1263-3.
[17] Kara P, Karaçay Yłkar S, Çerçer Z, et al. Perception and readiness for inter-professional education of health discipline students: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today, 2022, 112:105333. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105333.
[18] Visser C,Ket J, Croiset G, et al. Perceptions of residents, medical and nursing students about Interprofessional education: a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative literature[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2017,17(1):77. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-0909-0.
文章导航

/