医学教育评估

客观结构化临床考试在助产学专业学生助产技能训练中的应用

  • 姚家思 ,
  • 陈海英 ,
  • 李霞 ,
  • 陈红月 ,
  • 陈春宁
展开
  • 1河北医科大学护理学院助产学教研室,石家庄 050030;
    2河北省石家庄市妇产医院产房 050031;
    3河北医科大学第二医院妇产科,石家庄 050003

收稿日期: 2020-12-21

  网络出版日期: 2021-06-29

基金资助

河北省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目(GH201005);河北医科大学2019年度人文社会科学资助项目(SKJC201814);河北医科大学2020年度教育教学研究项目(2020130)

The application and evaluation of objective structured clinical examination in midwife skill training courses

  • Yao Jiasi ,
  • Chen Haiying ,
  • Li Xia ,
  • Chen Hongyue ,
  • Chen Chunning
Expand
  • 1Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050030, China;
    2Department of Obstetrics, Shijiazhuang Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital in Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050031, China;
    3Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050030, China

Received date: 2020-12-21

  Online published: 2021-06-29

Supported by

Hebei Province Research Project of Humanities and Social Science (GH201005);Hebei Medical University Humanities and Social Science Project of 2019(SKJC201814);Hebei Medical University Education and Teaching Reform Project of 2020(2020130)

摘要

目的 探讨客观结构化临床考试(objective structured clinical examination, OSCE)在本科助产学专业学生助产技能训练中的应用效果。方法 2019年6月,选取河北医科大学2017级四年制助产学专业30名学生为研究对象,通过文献回顾法和专家咨询法构建考站,招募并培训高年级助产学生作为标准化孕产妇参与考核,并采用问卷调查方法收集学生对本次考核的评价。结果 本次考核含5个考站,其中3个考站配有标准化病人(standardized patients, SP)(本文称为“标准化孕产妇”)参与。学生考核成绩在88.60分~96.80分之间,平均成绩为92.21分。学生对本次考核的总体满意度为(63.37±6.47)分。3个SP考站中SP对学生评价分别为(80.13±2.22)分、(81.96±1.15)分、(83.83±1.02)分。结论 客观结构化临床考试比较全面、科学地评价了学生的助产技能水平,标准化孕产妇对学生的评价和反馈有利于完善评价角度、满足学生需求,为助产学专业学生助产核心胜任力的培养提供了参考依据。

本文引用格式

姚家思 , 陈海英 , 李霞 , 陈红月 , 陈春宁 . 客观结构化临床考试在助产学专业学生助产技能训练中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021 , 41(7) : 642 -646 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20201221-01746

Abstract

Objective To apply the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in midwifery skills training courses among midwifery students and to discuss the potential effects of OSCE among midwifery students. Methods In June 2019, a total of 30 midwifery students enrolled in 2017 from Hebei Medical University were selected. Literature review and expert discussion were used to construct test stations. Standardized patients were enrolled and trained for the exam. Students were asked to evaluate the examination by filling a survey questionnaire. Results Five test stations were used and three of them used standardized patients(SP). Students final scores of the exam ranged from 88.60 to 96.80, with an average of 92.21. The satisfaction score of the exam from students was (63.37±6.47). The scores of students given by SP in the three stations were(80.13±2.22), (81.96±1.15) and (83.83±1.02) respectively. Conclusions OSCE gave comprehensive and scientific evaluation of students' midwifery skills. The feedback from SP may optimize the feedback to trainers and thus provide the evidence for the improvement of midwifery students' training aiming at their core competency.

参考文献

[1] Koblinsky M, Matthews Z, Hussein J, et al. Going to scale with professional skilled care[J]. Lancet, 2006,368(9544):1377-1386. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69382-3.
[2] The International Confederation of Midwives. International definition of the midwife[EB/OL].(2019-01-30)[2019-05-25]. http://www.internationalmidwives.org.
[3] 路简羽. 助产专业应届大专毕业生核心胜任力及影响因素调查研究[D]. 北京:北京大学,2017.
[4] Fullerton JT, Thompson JB, Severino R. The International Confederation of Midwives essential competencies for basic midwifery practice. an update study: 2009-2010[J]. Midwifery, 2011,27(4):399-408. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.005.
[5] 刘幼华, 郭红. 客观结构化临床考试在我国护理教育领域研究的文献计量分析[J].护理研究,2019,33(10):1754-1758. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2019.10.026.
[6] 金哲, 张道俭, 王颖, 等. 基于标准化病人的住院医师石膏固定术考核方法的改进研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2018,38(1):124-128. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.01.028.
[7] 孙孟茹, 郭红, 唐健, 等. 以标准化孕产妇为基础评价本科助产专业学生沟通技能的质性研究[J].医学教育研究与实践,2019,27(3):518-520,533. DOI: 10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2019.03.040.
[8] Lewis KL, Bohnert CA, Gammon WL, et al. The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP)[J]. Adv Simul (Lond), 2017,2:10. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-017-0043-4.
[9] 李绍朋. 某医科院校国家临床医师资格分阶段考试第一阶段技能部分实证研究[D]. 沈阳:中国医科大学,2018.
[10] 曾惠文, 杨婧, 金晓燕, 等. 客观结构化临床考核在护理学基础技能考核中的应用[J].中华护理教育,2016,13(4):266-269.
[11] 白雪. 基于客观结构化临床考试的医学生临床能力现状及影响因素研究[D]. 沈阳:中国医科大学,2018.
[12] 漆书清. 教育统计与测量[M]. 沈阳:辽宁大学出版社,2007:119-124.
[13] 王洋, 孙爱峰. 测验效标关联效度大小的统计学估计[J].中国医药指南,2011,9(31):234-235. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8194.2011.31.190.
[14] Lee WJ, Clark L, Wortmann K, et al. Interprofessional healthcare student training in the care of sexual assault patients utilizing standardized patient methodology[J]. Simul Healthc, 2019,14(1):10-17. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000331.
[15] 吴雅晶, 尹永田, 陈莉军, 等. 中医院校护理本科生客观结构化临床考试设计及效果评价[J].护理研究,2017,31(15):1881-1884. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2017.15.028.
文章导航

/