中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 490-495.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250903-01060

• 思想品德与医德教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

医学生主观幸福感与思政教育情境幸福感对思政教育满意度的差异化驱动作用研究

白杨1, 景正伟2, 李清良1, 刘靖1, 何小璐1   

  1. 1北京大学第六医院党委院长办公室,北京 100191;
    2杭州医学院公共卫生学院社会医学与卫生事业管理教研室,杭州 311300
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-03 出版日期:2026-07-01 发布日期:2026-07-01
  • 通讯作者: 何小璐, Email: angelhlu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学医学部学生工作研究课题重点招标课题(BYXG230108);2022年度北京大学医学部教育教学研究立项课题(2022ZD03)

A study on the differential driving effects of medical students' subjective well-being and situational well-being in ideological and political education on their satisfaction with ideological and political education

Bai Yang1, Jing Zhengwei2, Li Qingliang1, Liu Jing1, He Xiaolu1   

  1. 1Office of the Party Committee and the President, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing 100191, China;
    2Department of Social Medicine and Health Services Management, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 311300, China
  • Received:2025-09-03 Online:2026-07-01 Published:2026-07-01
  • Contact: He Xiaolu, Email: angelhlu@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Key Bidding Project for Student Work Research at Peking University Health Science Center(BYXG230108); 2022 Education and Teaching Research Project of Peking University Health Science Center(2022ZD03)

摘要: 目的 探究医学生主观幸福感与思政教育情境幸福感对其思政教育满意度的差异化驱动作用。方法 2025年3至6月,采用方便抽样方法选取某医学院校226名全日制学生为研究对象。采用PERMA-Profiler幸福指数量表测量其主观幸福感,自编“思政教育情境幸福感问卷”并测量其思政教育情境幸福感,以单一条目(0~10分)评价其思政教育满意度。采用验证性因子分析检验思政教育情境幸福感问卷结构效度,通过单样本威尔科克森符号秩检验比较评分与理论中值,采用多元线性回归分析2种幸福感对思政教育满意度的影响。结果 思政教育情境幸福感问卷各维度的克朗巴赫系数均≥0.90,组合信度均≥0.90,平均方差抽取量均≥0.74;模型拟合良好(卡方自由度比=2.34,比较拟合指数=0.97,近似误差均方根=0.08)。医学生主观幸福感各维度评分中位数介于7.67~8.33分之间,思政教育情境幸福感各维度评分中位数介于4.00~4.33分之间,均高于理论中值(5分和3分,均P<0.001)。不同性别、学历层次医学生的2类幸福感评分差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。思政教育情境幸福感(β=0.41,P<0.001)与主观幸福感(β=0.23,P=0.002)均正向影响医学生的思政教育满意度,前者作用显著强于后者。结论 医学生的主观幸福感与思政教育情境幸福感均较高,两者共同正向影响思政教育满意度,但思政教育情境幸福感的驱动作用远强于主观幸福感,提示强化学生在思政教育情境中的即时积极心理体验是提升思政教育满意度的关键实践着力点。

关键词: 学生,医科, 思政教育满意度, 思政教育情境幸福感, 主观幸福感, PERMA模型

Abstract: Objective To investigate the differentiated driving effects of medical students' subjective well-being and situational well-being in ideological and political education on their satisfaction with ideological and political education. Methods From March to June 2025, a convenience sampling method was used to select 226 full-time students from a medical university as participants. The PERMA-Profiler scale was used to measure their subjective well-being. A self-developed ″Situational Well-being in Ideological and Political Education Questionnaire″ was used to measure their situational well-being in ideological and political education. A single item (0-10) was used to assess their satisfaction with ideological and political education. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to examine the structural validity of the Situational Well-being Questionnaire. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the scores with theoretical median values. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the effects of the two types of well-being on satisfaction. Results For the situational well-being questionnaire, Cronbach's α coefficients for all dimensions were ≥0.90, composite reliability (CR) values were ≥0.90, and average variance extracted (AVE) values were ≥0.74. The model fit was acceptable (χ2/df=2.34, CFI=0.97, RMSEA=0.08). The median scores for the dimensions of subjective well-being among medical students ranged from 7.67 to 8.33. The median scores for the dimensions of situational well-being in ideological and political education ranged from 4.00 to 4.33. All scores were significantly higher than the respective theoretical median values (5 and 3, all P<0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in either type of well-being by gender or educational level (all P>0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that both situational well-being in ideological and political education (β=0.41, P<0.001) and subjective well-being (β=0.23, P=0.002) positively influenced medical students' satisfaction with ideological and political education, with the former having a significantly stronger effect than the latter. Conclusions Medical students' subjective well-being and their situational well-being in ideological and political education are both relatively high. Both types of well-being positively influence satisfaction with ideological and political education, but the driving effect of situational well-being in ideological and political education is considerably stronger than that of subjective well-being. This suggests that enhancing students' immediate positive psychological experiences within the context of ideological and political education is a key practical focus for improving satisfaction with ideological and political education.

Key words: Students, medical, Satisfaction with ideological and political education, Situational well-being in ideological and political education, Subjective well-being, PERMA theory

中图分类号: