全科军医岗位胜任力指标体系的构建

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250421-00446

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 310-314.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250421-00446

全科军医岗位胜任力指标体系的构建

董召¹, 石明月¹, 史康², 董晓建³, 刘伟明⁴, 杨家骁⁵, 葛伟¹

¹空军军医大学西京医院全科医学科,西安 710032;
²空军军医大学教务处,西安 710032;
³空军军医大学军事预防医学系卫生事业管理与医学教育教研室,西安 710032;
⁴空军军医大学西京医院医务处,西安 710032;
⁵中国人民解放军95577部队医院综合门诊,曲靖 655600

收稿日期:2025-04-21 出版日期:2026-04-01 发布日期:2026-03-27
通讯作者: 葛伟, Email: geweidr@fmmu.edu.cn
基金资助:
全国教育科学国防军事教育学科规划课题(JYKY-D 2023033);陕西高等教育教学改革研究项目(19JY026);国家自然科学基金(82270259)

Construction of general practice military doctors′ competency evaluation indicator system

Dong Zhao¹, Shi Mingyue¹, Shi Kang², Dong Xiaojian³, Liu Weiming⁴, Yang Jiaxiao⁵, Ge Wei¹

¹Department of General Practice, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi′an 710032, China;
²Academic Affairs Office, Air Force Medical University, Xi′an 710032, China;
³Department of Preventive Medicine, Air Force Medical University, Xi′an 710032, China;
⁴Department of Medical Service, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi′an 710032, China;
⁵General Clinic, Unit 95577 of the Chinese People′s Liberation Army, Qujing 655600, China

Received:2025-04-21 Online:2026-04-01 Published:2026-03-27
Contact: Ge Wei, Email: geweidr@fmmu.edu.cn
Supported by:
The National Education Sciences Planning Project for Defense and Military Education (JYKY-D 2023033); The Shaanxi Provincial Higher Education Teaching Reform Research Project (19JY026); The National Natural Science Foundation of China (82270259)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的构建全科军医岗位胜任力指标体系,明晰基层军医培养方向,实现精准化人才评价。方法整合文献分析、组内研讨和专家论证意见构建指标框架,采用德尔菲法对18名专家进行2轮咨询,引入层次分析法形成判断矩阵,计算各级指标重要性的权重值,形成评价指标体系。结果 2轮咨询问卷回收率均为100.0%,专家权威系数为0.875,第二轮专家意见协调系数为0.400(P＜0.05),确立含6个一级指标和27个二级指标的全科军医岗位胜任力指标体系。一级指标权重排序为职业素养(0.363)、知识能力(0.260)、救治能力(0.175)、军政素养(0.076)、沟通拓展(0.076)、终身发展(0.050)。结论研究形成的岗位胜任力指标体系兼具科学性与实用性,明确了全科军医“6大核心胜任力”培养目标,为创新军医培养机制、优化卫勤人才评估体系提供理论支撑,有望推动基层卫勤服务能力升级与可持续发展。

关键词: 全科医学, 全科军医, 胜任力, 德尔菲, 指标体系

Abstract: Objective To construct general practice military doctors′ competency evaluation indicator system, clarify the training objectives for grass-roots general practice military doctors under the new situation and facilitate accurate evaluation of their competencies. Methods The evaluation index framework was initially established by literature review, expert consultation and group discussion. The Delphi method was used to determine the index system by two rounds of correspondence to 18 experts. Then combined with Analytic Hierarchy Process to form the judgment matrix, calculate the weight values of the importance of indicators at all levels, and form the evaluation indicators system. Results The recovery rates of questionnaires in both rounds of consultation were 100.0%. The expert authority coefficient was 0.875, and the coordination coefficient of expert opinions in the second round reached 0.400 (P<0.05), leading to the establishment of an evaluation indicator system of general practice military doctors′ competency. This system comprises 6 first-level indicators and 27 second-level indicators. The weight ranking of first-level indicators is as follows: occupational qualities (0.363), knowledge ability (0.260), rescue ability (0.175), military and political literacy (0.076), communication expansion (0.076), and lifelong development (0.050). Conclusions The evaluation indicator system determined by the Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process is scientifically reliable. It clarifies the training objectives of the ″six core competencies″ of general practice military doctors. It is of great significance for establishing and improving the training, education, and evaluation system of general medical doctors guided by job competencies in the military, ensuring the sustainable and high-quality growth of grass-roots military doctors, and promoting the high-quality development of grass-roots health care in the military.

Key words: General practice, General practice military doctors, Competency, Delphi method, Indicator system

中图分类号:

R-05

董召, 石明月, 史康, 董晓建, 刘伟明, 杨家骁, 葛伟. 全科军医岗位胜任力指标体系的构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(4): 310-314.

Dong Zhao, Shi Mingyue, Shi Kang, Dong Xiaojian, Liu Weiming, Yang Jiaxiao, Ge Wei. Construction of general practice military doctors′ competency evaluation indicator system[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2026, 46(4): 310-314.

参考文献

[1] 姚晓,宁江华,王鑫,等.全科医学思维在基层部队平时医疗工作中的运用与思考[J].人民军医,2019,62(12):1141-1145.
[2] 张翱宇,钱晓虎,付善柱.平战结合推动基层卫勤工作新变化[N].解放军报,2024-07-12(05).
[3] 王小均,孙邦栋.新体制下加强基层部队军医队伍建设的建议[J].人民军医, 2019, 62(12): 1130-1133.
[4] 张亚南,周文欣,余江.基于德尔菲-熵权法的临床军医岗位胜任力特征指标体系的构建[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2023, 39(18): 3225-3230. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-5519.2023.18.039.
[5] 宫雪.中国全科医生岗位胜任力指标体系构建研究[D].沈阳:中国医科大学,2022.
[6] 中国住院医师培训精英教学医院联盟.中国住院医师培训精英教学医院联盟住院医师核心胜任力框架共识[J].协和医学杂志, 2022, 13(1): 17-23.
[7] 刘秀颖,赵欣宇,聂玲,等.北京地区疾病预防控制机构专业人员岗位胜任力要素分析[J].首都公共卫生,2021,15(4):232-236.DOI:10.16760/j.cnki.sdggws.2021.04.014.
[8] 刘晶,李宗友,石英杰,等.基于德尔菲法与层次分析法的三级公立中医医院高质量发展评价指标体系研究[J].中国中医药图书情报杂志, 2024, 48(2): 13-19. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5707.202308119.
[9] 杨晨昕,崔琦,刘思琪,等.基于德尔菲法的公共卫生专业人员岗位胜任力指标体系构建研究[J].卫生职业教育, 2021, 39(14): 128-130.
[10] 杨晨昕.公共卫生专业人员岗位胜任力评价指标体系构建及量表编制研究[D].沈阳:中国医科大学, 2022.
[11] Alimohammadzadeh K, Bahadori M, Hassani F. Application of analytical hierarchy process approach for service quality evaluation in radiology departments: a cross-sectional study[J]. Iran J Radiol, 2016,13(1):e29424. DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.29424.
[12] Li Y, Li J, Li B, et al. An evaluation index system for research efficiency of research-oriented hospitals in China[J]. Inquiry, 2021,58:469580211059469. DOI: 10.1177/00469580211059469.
[13] Saaty TL. Modeling unstructured decision problems—the theory of analytical hierarchies[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 1978, 20(3): 147-58.
[14] 黄彬彬,程思宇,张栗,等.基于德尔菲法和层次分析法的公共卫生人员卫生应急工作胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J].现代预防医学, 2024, 51(10): 1815-1820. DOI:10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202402175.
[15] 杨丽娟,张宇晴,林平,等.基于德尔菲法的药学门诊管理标准要素研究[J].中国医院, 2022, 26(2): 2-4,1. DOI:10.19660/j.issn.1671-0592.2022.2.01.
[16] 田建全,苗丹民,贡京京.军校学员领导力胜任特征模型的建立[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2007(7):618-622. DOI:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2007.07.024.
[17] Wei Y, Wang F, Pan Z, et al. Development of a competency model for general practitioners after standardized residency training in China by a modified Delphi method[J]. BMC Fam Pract, 2021,22(1):171. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01508-7.

全科军医岗位胜任力指标体系的构建

Construction of general practice military doctors′ competency evaluation indicator system

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郭亚威, 朱丹丹, 韩英娜, 刘志, 王长远. 原位模拟在急诊科住院医师规范化培训综合急救技能培训中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(4): 264-268.
[2]	王护国, 郭雪, 王瑞, 武云. “为亲友建立健康档案”实践教学模块在全科医学概论教学中的应用评价[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(4): 284-287.
[3]	张子艺, 郭钰昕, 史时苗, 施莉莉, 蔡雨阳. 上海市基层公共卫生医师胜任力现状调查分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(4): 304-309.
[4]	白薇, 桑田, 刘黎黎, 于果, 齐建光. 基于胜任力导向的儿科学实习教学与评价体系改革研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(3): 206-211.
[5]	钱李果, 王慧, 李涛, 王翠, 刘奕君, 杨延砚. 康复治疗学硕士研究生培养方案的改革措施探索[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(3): 218-223.
[6]	陈文娟, 曹清, 张静, 王莹, 董璐, 李萍萍, 王翠锦, 步军. 里程碑改良三维评价体系在儿科住院医师核心胜任力培养中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(3): 224-229.
[7]	程海丹, 张蒙, 田君叶, 路潜, 齐心, 王琤. 新入职护士置信职业行为指标的构建研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(3): 230-235.
[8]	钱丝诗, 赵涵琪, 康睿, 李勇, 胡一梅. 中医学“5+3”一体化学生住院医师规范化培训阶段临床能力评价指标体系构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(2): 141-145.
[9]	李君, 苏钊仪, 谢阿娜, 由由. 美国3所医学院医学生学业评价体系特点与启示[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(2): 151-155.
[10]	贾冕, 谭梅美, 甘继瑞, 关玉平, 李颖. 临床科室教学绩效评价指标体系的构建和信度与效度检验[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(1): 73-77.
[11]	张艳, 黄丽娟, 朱文华, 方力争. 双督导在全科教学门诊中的应用探索[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(9): 681-685.
[12]	刘红艳, 曾凯, 郑思怡, 麦穗, 韦曦. 口腔内科住院医师规范化培训中牙体牙髓专业置信职业行为指标构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(9): 696-701.
[13]	郝立晓, 李静, 陈超, 陈丽芬, 王亚军, 岳敏, 贾建国. 综合性医院全科医学临床带教师资综合评价指标体系初步构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(9): 707-714.
[14]	葛燕, 陈谊月, 彭笑菲, 凌光辉, 李芬. 基于胜任力的美国风湿病学专科医师培训评估体系的发展与思考[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(9): 715-719.
[15]	马丽莉, 杨智蕴, 吕剑虹, 张亚丽, 秦小欢, 张伟英. 基于ARCS学习动机模型的重症护理人文培训课程的构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(8): 588-595.