中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 751-755.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20260409-00490

• 教学方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

角色扮演联合SBAR沟通模式在神经外科住培学员医患沟通能力培训中的应用

古妮娜, 徐丹   

  1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经外科,重庆 400016
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-09 出版日期:2026-10-01 发布日期:2026-09-30
  • 通讯作者: 徐丹, Email: dan_x25@163.com

Application of role-playing combined with the SBAR communication model in patient-physician communication skills training for neurosurgery residents

Gu Nina, Xu Dan   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
  • Received:2026-04-09 Online:2026-10-01 Published:2026-09-30
  • Contact: Xu Dan, Email: dan_x25@163.com

摘要: 目的 探究角色扮演联合现状-背景-评估-建议(situation-background-assessment-recommendation,SBAR)沟通模式在神经外科住院医师规范化培训(简称住培)医患沟通能力培养中的应用效果。方法 采用随机抽样法,选取2023年9月至2025年8月于重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经外科接受住培的100名学员为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其平均分为试验组与对照组,每组各50名学员。以进行脑出血患者入院沟通教学为例,试验组学员采用角色扮演联合SBAR沟通模式进行培训,对照组学员采用传统教学方法开展培训;培训前后分别采用医患沟通技能评价量表对两组学员进行考核评估,培训后对两组学员开展教学满意度问卷调查,同时调查患者及家属对两组学员的满意度。数据分析采用t检验和χ2检验。结果 培训后,试验组学员在信息给予和理解患者2个维度的评分均高于对照组学员[(3.62±0.57)分比(3.32±0.74)分,(3.46±0.61)分比(3.18±0.72)分,均P<0.05]。问卷调查结果显示,试验组学员对指导医师满意度、提升临床思维培养和医患沟通自信的满意度均高于对照组学员[94.0%(47/50)比72.0%(36/50),94.0%(47/50)比72.0%(36/50),94.0%(47/50)比70.0%(35/50),均P<0.05];患者及其家属对试验组学员更为信任[88.0%(44/50)比56.0%(28/50),P<0.05],同时患者及其家属对试验组学员在医师解释病情清晰度、提供治疗方案并讲解方案利弊和得到医师的尊重3个方面的满意度均高于对照组学员[88.0%(44/50)比66.0%(33/50),88.0%(44/50)比58.0%(29/50),86.0%(43/50)比60.0%(30/50),均P<0.05]。结论 角色扮演联合SBAR沟通模式教学有助于提升住培学员的医患沟通能力,有助于提升住培学员的教学满意度,有助于提升患者及家属对住培学员的满意度。

关键词: 角色扮演, 现状-背景-评估-建议沟通模式, 住院医师规范化培训, 医患沟通

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effectiveness of a teaching approach combining role-playing with the situation-background-assessment-recommendation(SBAR) communication model in developing patient-physician communication skills among neurosurgery residents undergoing standardized residency training. Methods A total of 100 residents undergoing neurosurgery residency training at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from September 2023 to August 2025 were enrolled in the study by random sampling. Using a random number table, they were evenly divided into an experimental group and a control group, with 50 participants in each group. Using admission communication training for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage as an example, residents in the experimental group received training using a role-playing approach combined with the SBAR communication model, while those in the control group received training using traditional teaching methods. Both groups were assessed before and after the training using a physician-patient communication skills evaluation scale. After training, both groups completed a teaching satisfaction questionnaire, and patients and their families were surveyed regarding their satisfaction with the physicians in both groups. Data analysis was performed using t-tests and chi-square tests. Results Following training, differences in scores between the experimental group and the control group on the two dimensions of ″information provision″ and ″patient understanding″ were both statistically significant[(3.62±0.57)vs. (3.32±0.74), (3.46±0.61) vs. (3.18±0.72), all P<0.05]. The results of the teaching satisfaction questionnaire showed that the experimental group rated their satisfaction with the supervising instructors, as well as their confidence in developing clinical reasoning and doctor-patient communication skills, higher than the control group [94.0% (47/50) vs.72.0% (36/50), 94.0% (47/50) vs. 72.0% (36/50), 94.0% (47/50) vs. 70.0% (35/50), all P<0.05]; results from the patient and family satisfaction questionnaire indicated that patients and their families placed greater trust in physicians in the experimental group [88.0% (44/50) vs. 56.0% (28/50) , P<0.05]. Additionally,patient and family satisfaction with physicians in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group in three aspects:clarity of the physician's explanation of the condition, provision of treatment plans along with an explanation of their pros and cons, and the respect shown by the physician [88.0% (44/50) vs. 66.0% (33/50), 88.0% (44/50) vs. 58.0% (29/50), 86.0% (43/50) vs.60.0% (30/50); all P<0.05]. Conclusions Role-playing combined with the SBAR communication model training helps improve resident trainees' physician-patient communication skills and enhances both the trainees' satisfaction with the training and the satisfaction of patients and their families.

Key words: Role playing, SBAR communication model, Resident standardized training, Doctor-patient communication

中图分类号: