Evaluation of the performance appraisal system for resident standardized training teachers

  • Zhang Wei ,
  • Yan Xiaolei ,
  • Pan Pei ,
  • Liu Zhichen ,
  • Zhang Jingyi ,
  • Jin Leihui ,
  • Wang Xinbei
Expand
  • 1Resident and Specialist Standarized Training Office, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China;
    2Teachers' Work Department of the Party Committee, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China;
    3Discipline Construction Research Center of China Hospital Development Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200011, China

Received date: 2020-05-29

  Online published: 2021-01-25

Supported by

Graduate Education Project of Shanghai Education Committee(2017-6); Teacher Development Training Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (JFXM201904); Hospital Management and Construction Project of China Hospital Development Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CHDI-2019-B-12)

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the application effect of the performance appraisal system of the resident standardized training teachers. Methods From January to December, 2019, based on the hospital resident training management information system of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, the performance appraisal results of 603 resident standardized training teachers were selected. The scores of the base directors, residents and management personnel were analyzed, and the comprehensive performance evaluation scores were calculated. Results The performance evaluation scores of the base director, resident and management department for the resident standardized training teachers are [90(85, 95)], [100(98,100)], [69.0(54.6, 79.4)]. The comprehensive performance evaluation score of teachers is [82.6(77.4,87.6)]. Conclusions The evaluation results are basically consistent with other literature reports. The performance evaluation index system of resident standardized training teachers has certain representativeness and objectivity, which can effectively evaluate the main work and teaching effect of resident standardized training teachers.

Cite this article

Zhang Wei , Yan Xiaolei , Pan Pei , Liu Zhichen , Zhang Jingyi , Jin Leihui , Wang Xinbei . Evaluation of the performance appraisal system for resident standardized training teachers[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2021 , 41(1) : 83 -86 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200529-00848

References

[1]王欣倍, 严晓蕾, 潘沛, 等. 住院医师规范化培训临床带教师资培训探讨[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2017,16(4):407-410. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2017.04.021.
[2]张伟, 王欣倍, 严晓蕾, 等. 住院医师规范化培训信息化建设与师资管理[J].医学教育研究与实践,2020,28(1):147-149,176. DOI: 10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2020.01.037.
[3]齐建光, 闫辉, 张欣, 等. 探讨住院医师规范化培训师资带教能力的提高与评价[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2018,2(3):176-179.
[4]王波, 孟开, 陈淑玲, 等. 基于专家访谈的住院医师规范化培训影响因素研究[J].中国医院,2017,21(3):27-29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0592.2017.03.010.
[5]郑玉英, 阎作勤, 余情, 等. 上海市住院医师规范化培训师资队伍建设的研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2011,31(3):459-461. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2011.03.050.
[6]张艺能, 周晓舟, 朱桂平, 等. 住院医师规范化培训带教师资评价指标探讨[J].中国现代医生,2019,57(21):1-4.
[7]胡显锋, 胡绍, 王岚, 等. 以360度评估为主的综合评估是保证住院医师规范化培训质量的关键[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2019,3(5):385-390.
[8]应振华, 张贝江, 王莹, 等. 我国住院医师规范化培训360度评估体系的探索与实践[J].中国高等医学教育,2019(6):27-28,106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2019.06.014.
[9]黄辞, 陈宇昆, 李玉骞, 等. 360度评估系统在住院医师规范化培训中的意义[J].医学教育研究与实践,2020,28(1):177-181. DOI: 10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2020.01.045.
[10]姚晨姣, 姜艳红, 王云, 等. 探讨耶鲁-湘雅360度评估体系在住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2018,2(5):321-325.
[11]周智涓, 尚斌芳, 徐磊, 等. 360度评估系统在住院医师规范化培训信息化管理中的应用与探索[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2019,3(5):396-400.
[12]葛丽荣. 浅谈运用绩效考核提高住院医师规范化培训师资教学质量[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2019,6(88):191.
[13]张云, 方华, 赵敏. 精神科住院医师规范化培训师资队伍绩效考核体系的探索与实践[J].中国医院,2014,(2):62-64. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0592.2014.02.029.
Outlines

/