The exploration and practice of clinical thinking course conducted by computer-based case simulation and small group discussion for interns

  • Li Ying ,
  • Song Haoming ,
  • Yang Jun ,
  • Liu Qi ,
  • Li Bing ,
  • Ge Yanli ,
  • Jin Lingjing ,
  • Cheng Liming
Expand
  • 1Medical Education Division, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China;
    2Diagnostics Teaching and Research Section, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China;
    3Practice Training Center, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200070, China;
    4Department of Hematology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China;
    5Department of Gastroenterology , Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China;
    6President' s office, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China

Received date: 2019-07-12

  Online published: 2021-01-25

Supported by

Tongji University Graduate Education Reform Project (2018GH330); Teaching Reform project of Tongji Hospital of Tongji University(2017JGKT01)

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of simulated cases and small group case discussion teaching in a modular course of clinical thinking training for medical students in the internship stage. Methods From June 2018 to January 2019, 40 clinical medical students enrolled in 2014 in Tongji University School of Medicine were randomly divided into experimental group (n=20) and control group (n=20). The experimental group was given DxR teaching module first, then group discussion module, and the control group was taught in the reverse order. Students' evaluation of teaching methods was got by questionnaire. Score of DxR clinician and tests by multiple choice questions were used to assess the teaching effect. Results 76.7% (31/40) students thought that DxR module was helpful to cultivate clinical thinking ability, and 90.0% (36/40) students liked group discussion teaching and thought it was helpful to cultivate clinical thinking ability. The scores of mid-term examination and DxR score in the later stage of control group were significantly higher than those in the experimental group [(75.4±13.5) vs. (66.7±10.7), 57.3 (53.7,59.0) vs. 46.0 (43.0,53.0), all P<0.01]; the overall performance of DxR in the latter stage of the control group was significantly higher than that in the former stage [57.3 (53.7,59.0) vs. 46.0 (39.0,48.7), P<0.01]. Conclusions This modular course conducted by DxR clinician and small group discussion was implemented smoothly and were highly accepted by students. Small group discussion module ahead of DxR module could improve the teaching effect of DxR probably by forming friendly learning atmosphere and enhancing learning initiative. The application of two teaching methods could complement each other and improve clinical thinking ability from different dimensions.

Cite this article

Li Ying , Song Haoming , Yang Jun , Liu Qi , Li Bing , Ge Yanli , Jin Lingjing , Cheng Liming . The exploration and practice of clinical thinking course conducted by computer-based case simulation and small group discussion for interns[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2020 , 40(12) : 983 -987 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20190712-00549

References

[1] 殷晓丽,王德炳. 医学生临床思维能力培养探析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2014, 34(1): 10-13. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2014.01.003.
[2] 李明宝,罗志勇,殷小寒,等. 加强实习生临床思维能力培养的探讨[J]. 重庆医学, 2012, 41(10): 1037-1038. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2012.10.044.
[3] Myers JH, Dorsey JK. Using diagnostic reasoning (DxR) to teach and evaluate clinical reasoning skills[J]. Acad Med, 1994, 69(5):428-429. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199405000-00052.
[4] 朱卫国,刘继海,赵晓辉,等.虚拟病例教学软件PUMC-DxR Clinician的初步试用和评估[J]. 基础医学与临床,2015,35(9):1289-1292.
[5] 陆耀红,邹扬,施丹丹,等. DxR Clinician在国内医学模拟教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2014, 13(4): 402-406. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2014.04.021.
[6] 李菲卡,赵雅洁,崔佩菁,等. 全科医师临床能力DxR Clinician评估结果分析[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2015, 14(6): 462-464. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2015.06.019.
[7] Kitchen M. Facilitating small groups: how to encourage student learning[J]. Clin Teach, 2012, 9(1):3-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2011.00493.x.
[8] Young ME, Dory V, Lubarsky S, et al. Howdifferent theories of clinical reasoning influence teaching and assessment[J]. Acad Med, 2018, 93(9):1415. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002303.
[9] Thammasitboon S, Cutrer WB. Diagnostic decision-making and strategies to improve diagnosis[J]. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care, 2013, 43(9):232-241. DOI: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2013.07.003.
[10]Jouhari Z, Haghani F, Changiz T. Factors affecting self-regulated learning in medical students: a qualitative study[J]. Med Educ Online, 2015, 20:28694. DOI: 10.3402/meo.v20.28694.
Outlines

/