Objective To collect the nurses' evaluation to the professional ethics, communicating and cooperative capacity of residents from different sources in a residency institution, and to provide reference for achieving a quality homogenization. Methods Questionnaire survey was used. From April 2018 to April 2019, assessment of the professional ethics and communicating and cooperative capacity for 329 residents were conducted by 96 administrative nurses with “Digital Residence Training” APP in a residency institution. Results The proportions of the 3 indicators, “be compassionate and respect reasonable requirements of patients and their families” “be willing to listen and answer patient's questions using easy language” “dress in line with professional standards and neatly”, reflecting the professional ethics of these residents, ranked as “excellent” were 79.2%(889/1 122), 78.0%(875/1 122), and 83.9%(941/1 122), while the proportions of the 5 indicators, “respect nurse team and communicate effectively” “medical orders and medical documents are clear” “can be found when needed, respond timely to nurses report about patient's condition” “seek help timely from superior doctors and colleagues when needed” “inform nurses about the treatment and discharge plan of patients in time”, reflecting communicating and cooperative capacity, rated as “excellent” were 78.2%(877/1 122), 71.7%(804/1 122), 73.9%(829/1 122), 77.9%(874/1 122), and 71.7%(805/1 122) respectively. There was no statistically significantin scores of the professional ethics and communicating and cooperative capacity among the residents from other hospitals and graduate student, eight-year medical students and staff (P>0.05). Conclusions The professional ethics, communicating and cooperative capacity of residents were better as a whole. The professional ethics and communicating and cooperative capacity, which were homogeneous among residency from different sources.
Zeng Qingqi
,
Wang Jianliu
,
Liu Jing
,
Zhou Tao
,
Cui Yue
,
Gao Jie
. Evaluation of the different types of residents' professional ethics and communicating and cooperative capacity in the perspective of nurses[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2020
, 40(2)
: 139
-142
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2020.02.015
[1] Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA,et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an Interdependent world[J]. Lancet, 2010, 376 (9756):1923-1958.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.
[2]Swing SR, Clyman SG, Holmboe ES, et al. Advancing resident assessment in graduate medical education[J]. J Grad Med Educ, 2009,1(2):278-286. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-09-00010.1.
[3]Schwarz MR, Wojtczak A. Global minimum essential requirements: a road towards competence-oriented medical education[J]. Med Teach, 2002,24(2):125-129. DOI: 10.1080/01421590220120740.
[4] 国家卫生计生委办公厅. 关于印发住院医师规范化培训基地认定标准(试行)和住院医师规范化培训内容与标准(试行)的通知[EB/OL]. (2014-08-22) [2019-05-11].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/qjjys/s3593/201408/946b17f463fa4e5dbcfb4f
7c68834c41.shtml.
[5]Butterfield PS, Mazzaferri EL. A new rating form for use by nurses in assessing residents' humanistic behavior[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 1991, 6(2):155-161. DOI:10.1007/bf02598316.
[6] 张阳, 曲波, 孙宝志. 住院医师人际沟通能力与职业道德的评价——一项对北方9所医院300余名护士的调查研究[J]. 医学与哲学(人文社会医学版), 2011, 32(9):37-38,79.
[7] 曲波. 中国住院医师职业道德和人际沟通能力的评价[D]. 沈阳:中国医科大学,2012.
[8] 张阳. 住院医师沟通能力与职业道德的360度评价研究[D]. 沈阳:中国医科大学, 2010.
[9] 支琪. 主班护士在整体护理中的作用[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2009, 6(21):71-72.
[10] 于渊宁.中国医师协会召开“360度评估第二批试点工作视频培训会”[EB/OL].(2019-02-27)[2019-05-31]. http://www.ccgme-cmda.cn/news/6727/article.
[11] 曾庆奇, 刘婧, 高杰, 等.某住院医师规范化培训基地不同类型规范化培训人员能力评估情况的比较与分析 [J] . 中华医学教育杂志,2019,39( 6 ): 461-465. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.06.010.