Objective With advantages of different teaching approach, design and optimize a blended teaching model and learning resource based on study preference and rules of learning. Methods Analyze the study preference and study behaviors of students who have participated in the medical literature retrieval and application A in Fudan University in 2017. The 194 students include grade 2015 in clinical medicine major with 8-year-program and grade 2015 in Basic Medicine major with 5-year-program. The study behavior data were collected from the online platform, and the study preference data from questionnaire. Chisq analysis and ANOVA analysis were applied to analyze the data. Results The study preferences were significant different among four teaching methods (online autonomous learning, PBL, flipped classroom, traditional teaching) in different type of knowledge, such as introduction (χ2=36.01,P<0.001). For basic knowledge, students preferred the online autonomous learning; for comprehensive application and thinking method, students preferred traditional class teaching. There were significant differences in the discussion participation of students with different preferences in teaching form (χ2=17.87,P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in online self-test scores. In the form of learning resources, the PPT divided by knowledge points in PDF format is the most popular. Conclusions In blended teaching design, Teachers should not only focus on micro-video and flipped classroom, the learning characteristics of various kinds of knowledge should be fully considered. Comprehensive implementation of a variety of teaching forms should be applied in view of the students' learning preference. Teachers should give full play to the advantages of online autonomous learning, carefully design the PBL and flipped classroom to deepen the knowledge internalization, build the micro-grid and multi-dimensional learning resource system, and establish the mechanism of self-learning supervise.
Wang Yufang
,
Fu Liping
,
Cao Bing
,
Liu Zhenqiu
. Design and optimization of medical information retrieval blended teaching based on an empirical research of study preference[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2018
, 38(5)
: 709
-713
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.05.016
[1] 蒋红星, 代洪彬, 肖宗娜. 国内混合式学习的文献计量和知识图谱分析——基于CNKI2003—2016年数据[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,52(5):43-53. DOI: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2016.05.007.
Jiang HX, Dai HB, Xiao ZN. Bibliometric and knowledge mapping analysis of blended learning in China—based on CNKI data 2003-2016[J]. J Guangxi Norm Univ (Philos Soc Sci Ed), 2016,52(5):43-53. DOI: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6597.2016.05.007.
[2] 冯永华. 偏离与回归:基于人本价值的慕课反思——兼议cMOOC与xMOOC的融合[J]. 现代教育技术, 2016, 26 (10): 79-85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2016.10.012.
Feng YH. Deviation and return: The reflection of MOOC based on human-oriented value—discussion on the integration of cMOOC and xMOOC[J]. Mod Educ Technol, 2016(10): 79-85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2016.10.012.
[3] 单立冬, 陶金, 蒋星红. 基础医学课程中实施翻转课堂教学的评价[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2018, 38(1):129-133. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.01.029.
Shan LD, Tao J, Jiang XH. A qualitative systematic review of the flipped classroom in basic medical education[J]. Chin J Med Edu, 2018, 38(1): 129-133. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.01.029.
[4] 李洪涛, 周汉建, 张天托. 教师角色主动转换对医学生呼吸内科学见习教学效果的影响[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2017,37(6):921-925, 929. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.06.025.
Li HT, Zhou HJ, Zhang TT. The effect of teachers' role active conversion during teaching model of case-based learning combined with lecture-based learning in pre-clinical practice teaching of respiratory medicine[J]. Chin J Med Edu, 2017,37(6):921-925, 929. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.06.025.
[5] 蒋卓轩, 张岩, 李晓明. 基于MOOC数据的学习行为分析与预测[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2015(3):614-628. DOI: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2015.20140491.
Jiang ZX, Zhang Y, Li XM. Learning behavior analysis and prediction based on MOOC Data[J]. J Comput Res Dev 2015(3):614-628. DOI: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2015.20140491.