Objective To investigate the capacity of medical postgraduates' ethical analysis and the method of quantitative statistical analysis about bioethical case.Methods The ethical issues raised in uterine transplantation was taken into consideration. Self-designed questionnaire and quantitative statistical method is used to codify and analyze 340 medical postgraduates' written response about ethical perception of the uterine transplantation.Results There were 72.4%(246/340)students who held the supportive attitude toward the uterus transplantation, and had better understood about the ethical principles such as informed consent, max-benefit and min-risk. Logistic multivariate analysis found that the object who had realized the benefits of uterine transplantation and a higher degree of awareness about similar transplant was more likely to support the case. However, those who had the awareness of the probable risks during surgery were more likely to be opposed to it.Conclusions The investigated medical postgraduates had the basic level of ethical perception, meanwhile further improve was essential. Quantitative analysis was accurate method to evaluate medical students' ethical ability, and provided scientific basis for the teaching improving. However, further exploration of the measurement tools was necessary in the future.
Zheng Congyi
,
Zhang Xinqin
. Quantitative evaluation ethical perception analysis and argument ability of medical postgraduates based on an example about uterine transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2017
, 37(4)
: 518
-521
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.04.010
[1] Conway P, Gawronski B. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2013,104(2):216-235. DOI: 10.1037/a0031021.
[2] Goldin IM, Pinkus RL, Ashley K. Validity and reliability of an instrument for assessing case analyses in bioengineering ethics education[J].Sci Eng Ethics,2015,21(3):789-807.DOI:10.1007/s11948-015-9644-2.
[3] Benagiano G,Landeweerd L,Brosens I.Medical and ethical considerations in uterus transplantation[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2013,123(2):173-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.010.
[4] Johannesson L, Kvarnstrm N, Mlne J, et al. Uterus transplantation trial: 1-year outcome[J]. Fertil Steril, 2015,103(1):199-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.024.
[5] 梁声茹, 陈必良. 子宫移植与免疫抑制的相关进展[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2013(6):963-965. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2013.06.068.
Liang SR, Chen BL.Progress of uterine transplantation and immunosuppression[J].Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research,2013(6):963-965. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2013.06.068.
[6] 李卫平, 张晓莉, 徐虹, 等. 子宫移植的现状与展望[J].解放军医学院学报,2016,37(7):817-818,封3. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2016.07.038.
Li WP, Zhang XL, Xu H, et al. Overview and prospect of uterus transplantation[J].Academic Journal of Chinese PLA Medical School,2016,37(7):817-818,封3. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2016.07.038.
[7] Arora KS,Blake V.Uterus transplantation:the ethics of moving the womb[J].Obstet Gynecol,2015,125(4):971-974.DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000707.
