Application of combination with a variety of teaching methods in clinical practice of urology surgery

  • Xiong Yongjiang ,
  • Zhang Xuan ,
  • Liu Jiaji ,
  • Zhao Tao ,
  • Zhang Jiamo ,
  • Luo Huaming ,
  • Chen Xinyu
Expand
  • Department of Urology, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 402160,China(Xiong YJ, Zhang X, Liu JJ, Zhao T, Zhang JM, Luo HM);
    Department of Anatomy and Tissue Embryology, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine,Harbin 150040,China (Chen XY)

Online published: 2020-12-09

Abstract

Objective To explore the teaching effectiveness of combined teaching method in probation teaching of urology surgery.Methods A total of 240 general practice of clinical medicine students doing clinical practice at the Department of urology surgery,the Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical Universitywere selected as study subjects and divided into experimental group and control group with 120 in each group. With the study of prostate hyperplasia, the experimental group was adopted the combined teaching method, and the control group was adopted the lecture-based learning. The teaching outcomes in the two groups were evaluated by a uniform test and a questionnaire survey.Results The examination results, satisfaction, classroom atmosphere, practical operation ability and problem understanding of the students in experimental group were significantly better than the control group.Conclusions Through the combined teaching method, the students' interest in learning was stimulated, the team cooperation ability of students was enhanced, the participation of each student was guaranteed, and the teaching effectiveness was improved.

Cite this article

Xiong Yongjiang , Zhang Xuan , Liu Jiaji , Zhao Tao , Zhang Jiamo , Luo Huaming , Chen Xinyu . Application of combination with a variety of teaching methods in clinical practice of urology surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2017 , 37(6) : 931 -929 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.06.026

References

[1] Schmidt HG, Rotgans JI, Yew EH. The process of problem-based learning: what works and why[J]. Med Educ, 2011,45(8):792-806. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x.
[2] Bosse HM, Nickel M, Huwendiek S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of peer role play and standardized patients in undergraduate communication training[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2015,15:183. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-015-0468-1.

[3] Onyon C. Problem-based learning: a review of the educational and psychological theory[J]. Clin Teach, 2012,9(1):22-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2011.00501.x.
[4] Bokken L, van DJ, Rethans JJ. Performance-related stress symptoms in simulated patients[J]. Med Educ,2004,38(10):1089-1094. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01958.x.
[5] Allchin D. Problem- and case-based learning in science: An introduction to distinctions,values,and outcomes[J].CBE Life Sci Educ, 2013,12(3): 364-372.DOI:10.1187/cbe.12-11-0190.
[6] 龚邦东,汤建平,房星星,等.两种组合教学方法在内科学见习教学中实施效果的比较[J].中华医学教育杂志,2015,35(1):84-86,114.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2015.01.027.
Gong BD,Tang JP,Fang XX, et al. To compare the implementary effects of two kinds of teaching methods on internal medicine clinical practice[J].Chin J Med Edu,2015,35(1):84-86,114. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2015.01.027.
Options
Outlines

/