The United States and China have different disciplinary structure and R&D investment and post-doctoral funding systems.Postdocs play an important role in scientific research output.In order to understand the development status of post-doctoral development in China and the United States,especially the problems in post-doctoral training,this study compares the number of postdocs,R&D expenditure,quality and quality of research papers,and post-doctoral disciplinary structure between China and the United States to analyzes.The study found that the American R&D investment in the past 20 years and its ratio to GDP has stabilized,and the number of papers published in high-quality journals represented by Nature and Science has also stabilized,while both of them in China is still in a period of rapid growth.American medical postdocs who mainly study in clinical medicine account for 10.9%(1 980/18 244) of the total number of postdocs,while the proportion of Chinese medical postdocs is about 29.3%(18 975/64 712),mainly in clinical medicine.In this article,the insufficient of funding and quality of innovation training were discussed during the post-doctoral training process in China.In order to promote the development of medical postdocs,it was suggeste to improve medical postdoctoral funding and research environment and to optimize the layout of postdoctoral disciplines for promoting the development of China human resources in research emerging.
Li Aihua
,
Wang Xue
,
Du Jian
,
Tang Xiaoli
. Comparison of postdocs between China and the United States: evalution on the development of medical postdocs in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2019
, 39(10)
: 726
-731
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.10.002
[1] Ahmed MZ,Plotkin D,Qiu B,et al.Postdocs in science:a comparison between China and the United States[J].Bioscience,2015,65(11):1088-1095.DOI:10.1093/biosci/biv125.
[2] 张伟娜,王修来.中美博士后发展的结构比较与借鉴[J].黑龙江高教研究,2011(10):16-19.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2614.2011.10.005.
[3] National Science Foundation.Survey of graduate students and postdoctorates in science and engineering[EB/OL].[2019-03-21].https://nsf.gov/statistics/srvygradpostdoc/.
[4] 各年度博士后研究人员进站人数统计[EB/OL].[2019-03-21].http://www.chinapostdoctor.org.cn/WebSite/program/Info_Show.aspx?InfoID=ec3accab-cda6-40aa-b40a-0e50f96e2085.
[5] 姚云,曹昭乐.中国博士后资助体系30年及顶层设计重构[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2017,35(2):76-82.DOI:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.02.009.
[6] 姚云,曹昭乐,唐艺卿.中国博士后制度30年发展与未来改革[J].教育研究,2017,38(9):76-82.
[7] National Science Foundation.National patterns of R&D resources[EB/OL].[2019-03-21].https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/publication-series.cfm?seriesId=4.
[8] 国家统计局.R＆D普查公报[EB/OL].[2019-03-21].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/rdpcgb/.
[9] Arbeit CA,Kang KH.Field composition of postdocs shifts as numbers decline in biological sciences and in clinical medicine[EB/OL].[2019-03-21]. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17309/nsf17309.pdf.
[10] 姚云,万芳,高艺轩,等.博士后发展年度研究报告(2017)[M].北京:学苑出版社,2018:14.
[11] 关于公布中国博士后科学基金第62批面上资助获资助人员名单的通知[EB/OL].[2019-03-21].http://jj.chinapostdoctor.org.cn/V1/Program3/Info_Show.aspx?InfoID=2d574467-bd26-4895-91ba-856caed9c8ce&rnd=5e8f899f-a029-41b7-aa01-56b7499f6495.
[12] 关于公布中国博士后科学基金第61批面上资助获资助人员名单的通知[EB/OL].[2019-03-21]. http://jj.chinapostdoctor.org.cn/V1/Program3/Info_Show.aspx?InfoID=228891a8-a210-4a67-88e7-f0dfcced16ae&rnd=94113312-67f2-494f-b8e9-311725e7a764.
[13] 关于公布中国博士后科学基金第10批特别资助获资助人员名单的通知[EB/OL].[2019-03-21].http://jj.chinapostdoctor.org.cn/V1/Program3/Info_Show.aspx?InfoID=0d912d4d-1105-4362-aee5-6958276defe1&rnd=7a21ab07-6e71-4b17-abbf-67a3c030a11f.
[14] 张亚飞,马哲,赵平,等.临床医学博士后培养过程中的若干问题与建议[J].重庆医学,2011,40(34):3525-3526.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2011.34.042.
[15] 陈婷,吉训明.提高医学博士后培养质量的思考——基于北京市30名医学博士后的深入访谈分析[J].人力资源管理,2018(4):119-120.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8209.2018.04.107.
