Analysis of blind evaluation results of master's degree thesis of clinical medicine in different culture types

  • Li Yifeng ,
  • Li Niannian ,
  • Ye Ren ,
  • Zhao Jiayun
Expand
  • Graduate Management Section,Scientific Research Department,the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230022,China

Received date: 2018-12-04

  Online published: 2020-12-09

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the results of blind evaluation of academic and professional training master's degree thesis after the implementation of the "unification of four certificates "training model for postgraduates majoring in clinical medicine,and to analyze the existing problems and deficiencies,and to explore improvement measures and countermeasures.Methods The data analysis method was used.A total of 304 master's thesis from 2015 grade of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University was selected as research material with the method of date analyzing.The results of blind evaluation were compared between academic and professional training types with SPSS 21.0 software.Results Through the rank sum test,the overall evaluation rank-average values of academic master's and professional master's degree thesis are 169.87,142.22 (Z=2.86,P<0.01),and the rank-average values of the academic master's and professional master's degree thesis in internal science are 63.92,50.39 (Z=2.50,P=0.019),the rank-average values of the academic master's and professional master's degree thesis in surgery was 59.32,45.32 (Z=2.35,P=0.012).Among the sub-indicators,the results of the thesis innovation,the workload of the thesis,the scientific research ability and the technical ability,the author's academic style,the topic selection of the paper,etc.the academic masters are better than the professional masters (all P<0.05).There are strong correlations between the eight evaluation indicators of the dissertation and the overall evaluation (all P<0.01).Conclusions The quality of the academic master's degree of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University is better than that of the professional master's degree.The postgraduate students have problems such as insufficient scientific research ability,low innovation,and lack of normative writing.The corresponding postgraduate training and reform measures should be formulated to improve the guidance ability of the tutor,strengthen the cultivation of postgraduate research ability and innovative thinking,and improve the quality of postgraduate training.

Cite this article

Li Yifeng , Li Niannian , Ye Ren , Zhao Jiayun . Analysis of blind evaluation results of master's degree thesis of clinical medicine in different culture types[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2019 , 39(9) : 696 -700 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.09.012

References

[1] 陆晓雨,刘俊起.研究生学位论文实行网络评阅的探析[J].学位与研究生教育,2014(8):38-42.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-960X.2014.08.009.
[2] 刘春惠,王战军.基于学位类型的研究生教育质量评价[J].学位与研究生教育,2012(2):9-13.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-960X.2012.02.003.
[3] 陈永井.“四证合一”背景下医学研究生科研创新能力的培养途径[J].高教学刊,2016(12):11-12.
[4] 祖雅琼,陈洁莉,李丽剑,等.医学硕士专业学位研究生临床培养现状及对策研究——基于天津市15所三级医院专业学位研究生培养情况的分析[J].中国卫生事业管理,2012,29(7):526-528.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4663.2012.07.017.
[5] 李敏,陈洪捷.不合格学术型硕士研究生学位论文的典型特征——基于论文抽检专家评阅意见的分析[J].学位与研究生教育,2017(6):50-55.DOI:10.16750/j.adge.2017.06.010.
[6] 汪明,刘开翔,谢席胜.导师负责制在"四证合一"硕士研究生培养中的作用[J].中国继续医学教育,2018,10(3):19-22.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2018.03.011.
[7] 陈新超,徐永刚,罗国华.从评阅结果分析硕士学位论文质量[J].重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版),2013,32(3):125-128.
[8] 杜鹃.浅谈如何进一步提高“四证合一”医学专业硕士研究生培养的整体水平[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,20(S1):168-170.DOI:10.13916/j.cnki.issn1671-511x.2018.s1.035.
[9] 张萍,张艳萍,梁德东,等.“医教协同”背景下临床医学专业学位研究生科研能力创新培养模式构建[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2016,15(4):333-336.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2016.04.003.
[10] 奚社新,金保昇.研究生学风建设中导师作用的调查研究——基于S大学的案例分析[J].学位与研究生教育,2016(9):50-55.DOI:10.16750/j.adge.2016.09.012.
Outlines

/