Chinese Journal of Medical Education

Chinese Journal of Medical Education >

2019 , Vol. 39 >Issue 2: 81 - 92

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.02.001

Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research

  • Wu Hongbin ,
  • Wang Weimin
Expand
  • 1Institute of Medical Education/National Center of Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China;
    2Peking University Health Science Center/National Center of Health Professions Education Development, Beijing 100191, China

Received date: 2018-08-16

  Online published: 2020-12-08

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scholars (71804005); Discipline Construction Project of Peking University Health Science Center (BMU2017YB005)

Fold

Abstract

The reform and development of medical education should be supported by high-level medical education research. This paper reviews and introduces two research papers about the methods in medical education, which are published in the journal of medical teacher and these two papers have been regarded as the AMEE Guide. The purpose of this paper is to provide medical educators in China, especially those who are interested in and new to medical education research, with some references and a basic understanding of the methods of medical education research. Also, helps them to understand that how quantitative and qualitative methods contribute to the medical education evidence through different approaches and how to select the most appropriate approach according to the research questions. The main body of this paper includes six parts: research paradigm, research process, quantitative research design, qualitative research design, research object and sampling procedures, data collection and analysis. We thinks that the above six parts are of great reference and guiding significance for medical education research in China.

Key words： Medical education; Research methods; Quantitative research; Qualitative research

Cite this article

Wu Hongbin , Wang Weimin . Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2019 , 39(2) : 81 -92 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.02.001

References

[1] 殷晓丽,郭立,门寒隽,等.我国医学教育研究的现状及反思——基于5本主要医学教育学术刊物2007年刊载论文的分析[J].复旦教育论坛,2011,9(1):87-91.
[2] Tavakol M, Sandars J. Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: AMEE Guide No 90: Part I[J].Medical Teacher,2014,36(9):746-756.DOI: 10.3109/0142159x.2014.915298
[3] Tavakol M, Sandars J.Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: AMEE Guide No 90: Part II[J].Medical Teacher,2014,36(10):838-848. DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2014.915297.
[4] Norman G. Research in medical education: Three decades of progress[J].BMJ, 2002,324(7353):1560-1562.DOI:10.1136/bmj.324.7353.1560.
[5] Tavakol M, Torabi GS. Using evaluation research to improve medical education. [J].Clinical Teacher,2010,7(3):192-196.DOI:10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00383.x.
[6] Guba E.The paradigm dialoge[M].London: Sage Publication,1990:15-27.
[7] Denzin N, Lincoln Y. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research[M].Thousands Oaks: SAGE,2011:1-19.
[8] Griffin K, Museus SD. Application of mixed-methods approaches to higher education and intersectional analyses[J].New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(151):15-26.DOI:10.1002/ir.396.
[9] Liehr P, Smith M. Nursing research: Methods, critical appraisal and utilization [M].St.Louis: Mosby,2002:107-120.
[10] Morse J, Field P. Qualitative research methods for health professionals[M]. Thousand Oaks:SAGE,1995:43.
[11] Burlington BS. Evidence-based nursing: The research-practice connection[J].3rd edition. Critical Care Nurse,2013,33(4):83-83.
[12] Brown C. Research methods for pharmaceutical practice and policy[M].London:Pharmaceutical Press.2010:17-35.
[13] Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches[M].Thousands Okas:SAGE,2003:103.
[14] Lodico M, Spaulding D, Voegtle K. Methods in educational research: From theory to practice[M].San Faransico: John Wiley & Sons,2010:440.
[15] Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education[M].London: Routledge,2008:10-12.
[16] Khatami S, Macentee MI, Pratt DD, et al. Clinical reasoning in dentistry: A conceptual framework for dental education[J].Journal of Dental Education,2012, 76(9):1116-1128.DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8191.2012.01496.x.
[17] Tavakol S, Dennick R, Tavakol M. Medical students' understanding of empathy: A phenomenological study[J].Medical Education,2012,46(7):306-316.DOI:10. 1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04152.x.
[18] Holloway I, Biley FC. Being a qualitative researcher[J].Qual Health Res,2011, 21(7):968-975.DOI:10.1177/1049732310395607.
[19] Ashley P, Boyd B. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to research in environmental management[J].Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 2006,13(2):70-78.DOI:10.1080/14486563.2006.10648674.
[20] Taylor B. Qualitative research in the health sciences: Methodologies, methods and processes[M].New York:Routledge,2013:162-176.
[21] Henderson R. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook[J].Studies in Continuing Education,2011,33(3):372-374.DOI:10.1080/0158037X.2011.609670.
[22] Aveyard H. Doing a literature review in health and social care: A practical guide[J]. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling,2010,43(1):180-182.DOI: 10.1080/03069885.2014.975101.
[23] Sclater M. Applying theory to educational research: An introductory approaches with case studies[M].Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell,2012:157-176.
[24] Reeves S, Kuper A, Hodges BD. Qualitative research methodologies: Ethnography [J].BMJ,2008,337(7668):512-514.DOI:10.1136/bmj.a1020.
[25] Levin KA. Study design III: Cross-sectional studies[J].Evid Based Dent,2006, 7(1):24-25.DOI:10.1038/sj.ebd.6400375.
[26] Goldstein H. Longitudinal studies and the measurement of change[J].Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,1968,18(2):93-117.DOI:10.2307/2986775.
[27] Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, et al. The devil is in the third year: A longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school[J].Acad Med,2009, 84(9):1182-1191.DOI:10.1038/35044120.
[28] Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice[J].Nurse Education Today,2015,23(6):467-467.DOI:10.1016/S0260-6917(03)00079-0.
[29] Atkinson P, Pugsley L. Making sense of ethnography and medical education[J]. Medical Education,2010,39(2):228-234.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02070.x.
[30] Stern PN. Grounded Theory Methodology: Its uses and processes[J].Image,2010, 12(1):20-23.DOI:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1980.tb01455.x.
[31] Dickson GL, Flynn L. Nurses' clinical reasoning: Processes and practices of medication safety[J].Qual Health Res,2012,22(1):3-16.DOI:10.1177/1049732311 420448.
[32] Levy P, Lemeshow S. Sampling of populations: Methods and applications[M]. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Son,2008:10-16.
[33] Starks H, Trinidad SB. Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory[J].Qual Health Res,2007,17(10):1372-1380.DOI:10.1177/10
49732307307031.
[34] Edwards P. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: Systematic review[J].BMJ British Medical Journal,2002,324(7347):1183-1185.DOI:10.1136/ bmj.324.7347.1183.
[35] Britten, Nicky. Qualitative research: Qualitative interviews in medical research[J].BMJ,1995,311(6999):251-253.DOI:10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251.
[36] Schutt RK. Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research [M].Thousand Oaks:SAGE,2006:124-130.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉