Preliminary study on the construction of Mini-CEX scoring system of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine standardization

  • Lu Ping ,
  • Zhao Lei ,
  • Shen Mengwen ,
  • Ding Chunlei ,
  • Chen Yang ,
  • Qian Fenghua
Expand
  • 1College of Acupuncture and Tuina, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China;
    2Department of Emergency Medicine, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai 200437, China

Received date: 2019-07-29

  Online published: 2020-12-08

Supported by

Budget Internal Medicine Research Project of Shanghai Education Commission(2016-2018)

Abstract

Objective A set of standardized Mini-CEX scoring standards with characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine is planned to be applied to the clinical practice assessment of medical students in our hospital, so as to improve the clinical practice and assessment efficiency.Methods From January 2016 to December 2016, 40 students of 2012 five-year program of Shanghai University ofTraditional Chinese Medicine majoring in Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, who were interned in Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, were divided into standardized group and traditional group by random number table method, with 20 students in each group. The standardization group implements the standardized Mini-CEX assessment method, while the traditional group implements the traditional Mini-CEX assessment method. Statistical analysis of the two groups of students assessment results, and students and teachers of the questionnaire survey results were analyzed.Results The Mini-CEX score of standardized group was lower than that of traditional group[(2.45±0.88)vs(4.65±0.67), P<0.01]. Compared with the traditional assessment method of mini CEX, teachers scored higher on standardized Mini-CEX in terms of “clear scoring basis” [(7.90 ± 0.56) vs (2.90 ± 1.37) , P<0.01]; students scored higher on standardized Mini-CEX in terms of “clearer teacher's comments” and “new experience in TCM consultation method” [(5.95±2.08)vs(1.50±0.60),(4.20±0.69)vs(2.15±1.26), all P<0.01].Conclusions The establishment of standardized Mini CEX scoring standards helps to ensure the fairness and preciseness of assessment and education and teaching, so as to improve the quality of teaching.

Cite this article

Lu Ping , Zhao Lei , Shen Mengwen , Ding Chunlei , Chen Yang , Qian Fenghua . Preliminary study on the construction of Mini-CEX scoring system of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine standardization[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2020 , 40(8) : 606 -609 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20190729-00605

References

[1] 赵琛,沈宇弘,刘隽.基于Mini-CEX评价量表的临床技能考核结果和分析[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2010(8): 92-93,107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2010.08.047.
[2] 曹伟.Mini-CEX与住院医师能力评估[J]. 中国卫生质量管理, 2009, 16(3): 24-27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7515.2009.03.010.
[3] 钱义明,钱风华,张微微,等.Mini-CEX在中西医结合急诊医学教育中的应用[J]. 上海中医药大学学报, 2012(3): 9-10.
[4] 陈弼沧,王小龙,黄朝阳,等.量化迷你临床演练评估在临床教学中应用的探讨[J]. 广西中医药大学学报, 2012(3): 87-91.
[5] 李珊珊,沙丽艳,高莉莉,等.Mini-CEX在住院医师临床培养与考核中的推广困难分析[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2015(3): 54-55. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2015.03.029.
Outlines

/