Objective To investigate the mental health status of newly-enrolled “3+2” assistant general practitioner program students. Methods The investigation started in February 2017 covered 375 newly-enrolled “3+2” assistant general practitioner program students to complete university personality inventory (UPI) from 2017 to 2019, and rank sum test and chi-square test was used to analysis data. Results Students who were highly potential to have serious psychological problems (Type Ⅰ) take 15.5%(58/375), students who were possible to have general mental issues (Type Ⅱ) take 22.1%(83/375) , students who were relatively mentally healthy (Type Ⅲ) take 62.4% (234/375). UPI score of male was 3.00(1.00,9.00), female was 4.00(1.00,10.75), grade 2017 was 4.00(1.00,12.50), grade 2018 was 4.00(1.00,10.00), grade 2019 was 3.00(1.00,8.00), Daxing was 7.50(2.00,19.25), Pinggu was 3.00(1.00,10.00), Tongzhou was 6.00(1.00,11.00), Mentougou was 2.00(1.00,4.00), Huairou was 9.00(3.00,13.00), Miyun was 4.00(1.00,11.50), Yanqing was 3.00(1.25,8.25), Changping was 4.00(1.00,10.25), Shunyi was 3.00(1.00,8.00), Fangshan was 2.00(1.00,7.00). No significant difference was found among students enrolled from 2017 up to 2019, between male and females and different districts(all P>0.05). Conclusions Most of “3+2” assistant general practitioner program students had good mental health, and it was similar in different gender, grade and district. For the students of “3+2” program, we should give highly concern and construct stable mental health system, provide special consulting service according to students' metal health features.
Gao Liya
,
Du Juan
. Analysis of “3+2” assistant general practitioner program students' mental health by university personality inventory[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2020
, 40(1)
: 21
-24
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2020.01.006
[1] 卫生部,教育部.助理全科医生培训标准(试行)[Z].2012-09-10.
[2] 张东海,马秀华,刚君,等. 北京市实施“3+2”助理全科医师培训《临床综合课程》3年回顾[J]. 中华全科医学, 2017, 15(12): 2003-2007. DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.12.001.
[3] 黄艳,线福华,赵丽莉,等. “3+2”助理全科医师培养模式的探索与实践[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2014, 34(1): 31-33. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2014.01.009.
[4] 莫丽. 高职新生UPI心理健康调查分析及对策[J]. 职业教育研究, 2014 (1): 30-32.
[5] 高承慧. 艺术类大学新生心理健康UPI调查分析[J]. 新西部(下旬刊), 2013 (6): 145.
[6] 林玉琳,刘扬. “3+2”助理全科医生培养模式实施的调查与分析[J]. 继续医学教育, 2018, 32(3): 87-88. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2018.03.042.
[7] 吴钰. 硕士研究生新生心理健康状况调查[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2012, 20(1): 131-133.
[8] 单炯,赵洁,刘瑜婕. 全科医师规范化培训的回顾分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2010, 13(4): 353-355. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2010.04.006.
[9] 马静敏. 回龙观社区“3+2”助理全科医师教学实践基地教学实践方法与思考[J]. 继续医学教育,2016,30(10): 1-2. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2016.10.001.