Chinese Journal of Medical Education

Chinese Journal of Medical Education >

2026 , Vol. 46 >Issue 7: 496 - 501

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250424-00464

Educational Technologies

Research progress on simulation-based assessment of entrustable professional activities (EPAs)

  • Jiang Hui ,
  • Chen Xiaoling ,
  • Zeng Duo ,
  • Wang Xiandi ,
  • He Manqing ,
  • Wang Kunjie ,
  • Pu Dan
Expand
  • 1Department of Medical Simulation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;
    2Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

Received date: 2025-04-24

  Online published: 2026-07-01

Supported by

Sichuan Higher Education Personnel Training Quality and Educational Reform Project (JG2024-0016) 2024; Sichuan University Artificial Intelligence Empowerment Innovative Experimental Technology Project (SCU2024046) 2024; Sichuan University Research Project of Graduate Education and Educational Reform (GSSCU2024028) 2024; The 11th Research Project of Sichuan University Higher Education Teaching Reform Program (SCU11256) 2025

Fold

Abstract

Competency-based medical education (CBME) is one of the core features of the third generation of medical education reform. The entrustable professional activity (EPA) framework is a valuable assessment method. EPAs aim to assess medical students' clinical competency for specific roles by observing their behaviors. Ideally, it should be conducted in the workplace, but numerous challenges exist, prompting some scholars to propose implementing EPAs based on simulation. Currently, simulation-based EPA assessment is a relatively novel research field, with studies focusing on acceptability, reliability, and validity, and influencing factors. Simulation-based EPA assessment has high acceptability and provides learners with a psychologically safe environment; in terms of validity, it can effectively differentiate learners across different competency levels; regarding reliability, inter-rater consistency is higher in simulated settings than in clinical settings, although the correlation between simulation-based and workplace-based assessment results remains controversial; entrustment decisions are influenced by factors such as raters' understanding of ″entrustment″, scenario authenticity, and the diversity of clinical tasks. Although current evidence remains limited, simulation offers clear advantages for EPA assessment: it provides a controlled, low-risk environment that can effectively address issues such as lack of standardization and patient safety concerns in workplace-based assessment. Nonetheless, challenges persist, including high costs, technical constraints, and the need for robust standard-setting. Simulation-based EPA assessment primarily serves to standardize competence verification and enable low-stakes training and evaluation, offering learners a safe space for practice. In contrast, workplace-based EPA assessment remains the ultimate basis for entrustment decisions. The two modalities are complementary. Future research should further explore simulation-based EPA assessment to enhance the scientific rigor and operational feasibility of competence evaluation, thereby advancing the development of competency-based medical education.

Key words： Education, medical; Medical simulation; Entrustable professional activities; Competence; Research progress

Cite this article

Jiang Hui , Chen Xiaoling , Zeng Duo , Wang Xiandi , He Manqing , Wang Kunjie , Pu Dan . Research progress on simulation-based assessment of entrustable professional activities (EPAs)[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2026 , 46(7) : 496 -501 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250424-00464

References

[1] 李海潮. 我国医师胜任力模型的形成性评价:设计、实施与思考[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2024,23(1):7-11. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20231215-01607.
[2]金哲, 齐心, 李海潮, 等. 置信职业行为在临床医学教育中的应用[J].中华医学教育杂志,2019,39(4):314-320. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.04.018.
[3]ten Cate O. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training[J]. Med Educ, 2005,39(12):1176-1177. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02341.x.
[4]ten Cate O, Scheele F. Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice?[J]. Acad Med, 2007,82(6):542-547. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31805559c7.
[5]杜绍林, 罗常有, 董秀清, 等. 基于置信职业行为的住院医师岗位胜任力评估探索[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2024,8(7):481-486. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2024.07.001.
[6]李珊, 齐建光, 何睿, 等. 置信职业行为全球实施的挑战与区域经验[J].中华医学教育杂志,2026,46(5):321-325. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20260201-00156.
[7]许慧莹, 李月红. 肾内科专科医师置信职业行为核心指标构建[J].中华医学教育杂志,2025,45(9):677-680. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240709-00716.
[8]王景超, 李海潮, 江哲涵, 等. 置信职业行为在临床医学专业学生实习效果自评中的应用探索[J].中华医学教育杂志,2025,45(8):625-629. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240516-00493.
[9]王维民. 置信职业行为在本科医学教育阶段的应用[J].中华医学教育杂志,2024,44(12):886-889. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20241008-01034.
[10]闻德亮, 李鸿鹤, 丁宁. 置信专业活动的应用基础和研究进展[J].中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(2):99-103. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200517-00765.
[11]Weller J, Henderson R, Webster CS, et al. Building the evidence on simulation validity: comparison of anesthesiologists' communication patterns in real and simulated cases[J]. Anesthesiology, 2014,120(1):142-148. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a44bc5.
[12]Andler C, Daya S, Kowalek K, et al. E-ASSESS: creating an EPA assessment tool for structured simulated emergency scenarios[J]. J Grad Med Educ, 2020,12(2):153-158. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00533.1.
[13]Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review[J]. Med Teach, 2005,27(1):10-28. DOI: 10.1080/01421590500046924.
[14]Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. The use of clinical simulations in assessment[J]. Med Educ, 2003,37(Suppl 1):65-71. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.37.s1.8.x.
[15]乔静, 李珂, 齐建光. 基于CiteSpace的国内外医学模拟教育研究热点与发展趋势的比较及可视化分析[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2024,23(12):1641-1648. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20240122-01920.
[16]黄艰, 王默然, 李玲, 等. 模拟医学在麻醉住院医师规范化培训中的应用研究[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2024,23(4):555-559. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230511-01718.
[17]张媛媛, 刘婧, 文张, 等. 医学模拟教育现状与未来发展[J].中华医学教育杂志,2025,45(4):241-246. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250211-00137.
[18]Prudhomme N, O'Brien M, McConnell MM, et al. Relationship between ratings of performance in the simulated and workplace environments among emergency medicine residents[J]. CJEM, 2020,22(6):811-818. DOI: 10.1017/cem.2020.388.
[19]Pandya A, Patocka C, Huffman J. Simulation for assessment of entrustable professional activities in an emergency medicine residency program[J]. CJEM, 2022,24(1):84-87. DOI: 10.1007/s43678-021-00209-5.
[20]Sahi N, Humphrey-Murto S, Brennan EE, et al. Current use of simulation for EPA assessment in emergency medicine[J]. CJEM, 2024,26(3):179-187. DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00649-9.
[21]Bump GM, Cladis FP. Psychological safety in medical education, another challenge to tackle?[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2025,40(1):41-45. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-09166-y.
[22] McDermott DS, Ludlow J, Horsley E, et al. Healthcare simulation standards of best practiceTMprebriefing: preparation and briefing[J]. Clin Simul Nurs, 2021,58: 9-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.008.
[23]Dwyer T, Wadey V, Archibald D, et al. Cognitive and psychomotor entrustable professional activities: can simulators help assess competency in trainees?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2016,474(4):926-934. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4553-x.
[24]Hall AK, Chaplin T, McColl T, et al. Harnessing the power of simulation for assessment: consensus recommendations for the use of simulation-based assessment in emergency medicine[J]. CJEM, 2020,22(2):194-203. DOI: 10.1017/cem.2019.488.
[25]Weersink K, Hall AK, Rich J, et al. Simulation versus real-world performance: a direct comparison of emergency medicine resident resuscitation entrustment scoring[J]. Adv Simul (Lond), 2019,4:9. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-019-0099-4.
[26]Seed JD, Gauthier S, Zevin B, et al. Simulation vs workplace-based assessment in resuscitation: a cross-specialty descriptive analysis and comparison[J]. Can Med Educ J, 2023,14(3):92-98. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.73692.
[27]Lin YH, Yang YY, Chen CH, et al. Can routine EPA-based assessments predict OSCE performances of undergraduate medical students?[J]. Med Teach, 2025,47(7):1134-1143. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2413024.
[28]Suneja M, Hanrahan KD, Kreiter C, et al. Psychometric properties of entrustable professional activity-based objective structured clinical examinations during transition from undergraduate to graduate medical education: a generalizability study[J]. Acad Med, 2025,100(2):179-183. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005719.
[29]Jeyalingam T, Walsh CM, Tavares W, et al. Variable or fixed? exploring entrustment decision making in workplace- and simulation-based assessments[J]. Acad Med, 2022,97(7):1057-1064. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004661.
[30]Fincke F, Prediger S, Schick K, et al. Entrustable professional activities and facets of competence in a simulated workplace-based assessment for advanced medical students[J]. Med Teach, 2020,42(9):1019-1026. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1779204.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉