Objective To explore the limitations in clinical experience caused by regional and inter-hospital disparities in China′s standardized residency training for general practitioners, and to analyze the necessity and feasible pathways for inter-institutional collaborative training. Methods A qualitative research approach was adopted. In December 2024, purposive sampling was used to select 30 participants, including general practice residents, mentors, and training administrators from two public hospitals located in the southeastern coastal and northwestern inland regions of China. Focus group interviews were conducted, centered on training disparities and collaborative pathways. Thematic analysis was employed to extract core themes. Results Five key themes were identified: (1)Objective disparities exist between different regions/hospitals regarding disease spectrum, typical case resources, patient healthcare-seeking behaviors, and disciplinary development priorities. (2)Although training administrators are aware of these disparities, their potential impact on training homogenization has not been systematically addressed due to factors such as the current training guidelines emphasizing quantitative case coverage, the predominant trend of residents seeking local employment, and a primary focus on enhancing teaching and learning capabilities in current quality assessments. (3)Implementing multi-hospital collaborative training is necessary for promoting teaching homogenization, broadening residents′ clinical thinking, and improving mentors′ instructional skills. (4)Offline collaborative training faces low feasibility due to practical constraints including policy support, cost, geographical distance, and safety concerns. (5)Online collaborative training (e.g., remote case discussions, online teaching clinics, shared AI case databases, and virtual collaborative lesson preparation among mentors) is considered a viable and effective alternative at present. Conclusions Objective regional and inter-hospital resource disparities exist in China′s general practitioner training, posing a challenge to training homogenization. It is recommended to actively explore and promote a multi-center collaborative training model, starting with online collaborative training as an entry point. This approach can compensate for the limitations of single-institution training resources and systematically enhance the overall quality of general practitioner training.
Pan Cunxue
,
Zheng Junjiong
,
Wu Qin
,
He Tao
,
Wang Xuemei
,
Buaijier Abuduwayiti
,
Li Qingrong
,
Xiao Fei
,
Lin Tianxin
. A qualitative study on regional and inter-hospital disparities and collaborative pathways in standardized residency training for general practitioners[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2026
, 46(5)
: 343
-350
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20251025-01349
[1] 万晓文, 曾程, 李宗友, 等. 中国全科医生培养和使用发展报告(2022)[J].中国全科医学,2024,27(10):1153-1161. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0856.
[2] Rodriguez F, Cohen A, Betancourt JR, et al. Evaluation of medical student self-rated preparedness to care for limited English proficiency patients[J].BMC Med Educ, 2011,11:26. DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-11-26.
[3] Malik M, Tyson L, Bryant P, et al. Factors influencing the inclusion of diverse volunteer patients within medical student primary care placements[J].Med Educ, 2025,59(5):531-539. DOI:10.1111/medu.15562.
[4] 叶晨静, 王佳玉, 史霆, 等. 多学科协作联合情境模拟教学在全科医师规范化培训教学中的应用[J].中华全科医学,2024,22(6):915-918. DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003533.
[5] 赵文宣, 袁胜, 刘莎, 等. 国家命题对全科医师住培结业临床实践能力考核质量提升的分析[J].中华全科医学,2024,22(6):919-921,1042. DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn. 1674-4152. 003534.
[6] 敬泽慧, 刘冀, 李晓平, 等. 卡尔加里-剑桥指南联合SEGUE量表在全科医师规范化培训教学改革中的应用[J].中华全科医学,2024,22(6):922-925. DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003535.
[7] 梁凌波, 施奕, 卢文婷, 等. 首届全科住院医师规范化培训指导医师教学门诊竞赛四川省选拔赛分析[J].中华全科医学,2023,21(11):1951-1953,1957. DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003265.
[8] 陈国湘, 李俊, 韦华, 等. 基于人工智能技术的全科医生培养模式探索[J].中华全科医学,2021,19(2):167-170. DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001758.
[9] Verbree AR, Isik U, Janssen J, et al. Inclusion and diversity within medical education: a focus group study of students′ experiences[J].BMC Med Educ, 2023,23(1):61. DOI:10.1186/s12909-023-04036-3.
[10] Green AR, Chun M, Cervantes MC, et al. Measuring medical students′ preparedness and skills to provide cross-cultural care[J].Health Equity, 2017,1(1):15-22. DOI:10.1089/heq. 2016.0011.
[11] Weissman JS, Betancourt J, Campbell EG, et al. Resident physicians′ preparedness to provide cross-cultural care[J].JAMA, 2005,294(9):1058-1067. DOI:10.1001/jama.294.9.1058.
[12] Braun A, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology[J].Qual Res Psychol, 2006, 3(2):77-101. DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
[13] Clark NM, McClure P, Erickson A, et al. Impact of rural exposure during general surgery residency on practice in a rural community[J].Ann Surg, 2025,282(2):186-192. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006696.
[14] Edwards G, Spooner M, Arnett R, et al. Transnational medical education programmes and preparation for different country medical practice: a systematic review[J].Med Educ, 2025,59(9):924-937. DOI:10.1111/medu.15660.
[15] Sagoo MG, Lam PY, Sharma T, et al. Evaluating group dynamics through peer assessment during a global student collaboration of interprofessional healthcare education: a longitudinal study across 33 universities[J].Anat Sci Educ, 2025,18(5):436-447. DOI:10.1002/ase.70026.
[16] He G, Ren J, Chen X, et al. GP′s GP, general practitioner′s health and willingness to contract family doctors in China: a national cross-sectional study[J].BMC Prim Care, 2024,25(1):253. DOI:10.1186/s12875-024-02492-4.
[17] Wen S, Ruan Y, Shi Z, et al. The barriers to insulin therapy initiation in type 2 diabetes patients: a study of general practitioner perceptions in Huinan Community in South Shanghai[J].Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 2024,17:393-405. DOI:10.2147/DMSO.S446349.
[18] Klink KA, Albanese AP, Bope ET, et al. Veterans affairs graduate medical education expansion addresses u.s. physician workforce needs[J].Acad Med, 2022,97(8):1144-1150. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004545.
