Medical Education Assessment

Development of teaching performance evaluation index system for clinical departments and test of its reliability and validity

  • Jia Mian ,
  • Tan Meimei ,
  • Gan Jirui ,
  • Guan Yuping ,
  • Li Ying
Expand
  • 1Office of Medical Education, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China;
    2Department of Hospital Operations, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
Li Ying, Email: liying_elink@163.com

Received date: 2025-06-17

  Online published: 2025-12-31

Supported by

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding(2024-NHLHCRF-GL-03)

Abstract

Objective To develop a clinical department teaching performance evaluation index system and analyze its reliability, validity, and discrimination, in order to explore improvement plans. Methods From May 2021 to December 2024, a theoretical framework for the clinical department teaching performance evaluation system was constructed based on the Delphi method. Through expert consultation, 3 first-level indicators (teaching workload, teaching quality, teaching achievements), 10 second-level indicators, and 25 third-level indicators were selected. Teaching data from 77 clinical departments in a case hospital were included. Cronbach's α coefficient and factor analysis were used to test reliability and validity, while the product-moment correlation analysis was applied to assess discrimination. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of the index system was 0.775. Factor analysis extracted two common factors (teaching workload and teaching achievements), with a cumulative contribution rate of 52.4%. Except for three third-level indicators under the first-level indicator ″teaching quality″: teacher-student mutual evaluation, the compliance rate of continuing education, and teaching incident assessment, all other indicators showed significant discrimination (discrimination index ranging from 0.323 to 0.687, all P<0.001). Conclusions The clinical department teaching performance evaluation index system demonstrates good reliability and validity. Teaching workload and teaching achievements effectively reflect clinical teaching performance. However, indicators related to teaching quality require further optimization. This index system provides a scientific tool for performance assessment of teaching in clinical departments.

Cite this article

Jia Mian , Tan Meimei , Gan Jirui , Guan Yuping , Li Ying . Development of teaching performance evaluation index system for clinical departments and test of its reliability and validity[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2026 , 46(1) : 73 -77 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250617-00678

References

[1] 刘雪莲,何珂,陈震.大学附属医院教学绩效考核的难点与思考[J].中国继续医学教育,2021,13(25):114-118.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2021.25.030.
[2] 闫亮.企业绩效管理对高校绩效考核的启示[J].科教文汇,2020(2):20-21.DOI:10.16871/j.cnki.kjwhb.2020.01.009.
[3] 王克霞,宋春梅.高校新附属医院医师教学绩效纳入薪酬的激励机制探索[J].中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(1):6-9.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200407-00505.
[4] 任胜男, 乔静华, 丁诚, 等. 住院医师规范化培训基地临床教师教学绩效评价指标体系研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(4):368-371. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200901-01277.
[5] 申琪, 霍勤, 刘卉, 等. 中医院临床业务科室教学工作绩效考核实施方案和应用[J].中国继续医学教育,2023,15(10):5-9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2023.10.002.
[6] 张芹.浅谈医院临床科室教学秘书教学绩效考核管理[J].财经界,2017(35):135,117.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-2781.2017.35.100.
[7] 申琪,霍勤,刘卉,等. 中医院临床业务科室教学工作绩效考核实施方案和应用[J].中国继续医学教育,2023,15(10):5-9. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2023.10.002.
[8] 郭元, 林秀贤, 彭期期, 等. 教学医院科室主任绩效考核方法的探讨[J].中国医疗管理科学,2024,14(6):93-98. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-7432.2024.06.015.
[9] 陶冶栋, 彭月月, 王燕, 等. 积分制在教学绩效考核中的探索[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(1):85-87. DOI: 10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2020.28.1.23.
[10] 文兰, 蒋芳凡, 曾琳, 等. 附属医院临床教师教学绩效评价指标体系初探[J].科技创新导报,2020,17(32):195-197. DOI: 10.16660/j.cnki.1674-098X.2008-5640-4281.
[11] 施丹丹, 徐仲卿, 陈波, 等. 基于关键业绩指标的综合医院师资教学绩效评估方案的设计和实证[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2025,9(4):262-266. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2025.04.006.
[12] 李风艳, 赵春兰, 王立杰, 等. 积分制教学绩效考核体系激发医护人员临床带教积极性的研究[J].现代医院,2024,24(1):130-133. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-332X.2024.01.035.
[13] Stiagov GI. Use of the “Delphi” method in predicting the overall morbidity of the population[J]. Zdravookhr Ross Fed, 1973,17(6):15-18.
[14] 温忠麟, 陈虹熹, 方杰, 等. 新世纪20年国内测验信度研究[J].心理科学进展,2022,30(8):1682-1691.
[15] 张伟, 王耀晟, 陈光榆, 等. 某三甲医院临床研究考核评估体系的初探与实践[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,2020,33(3):227-231. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113565-20190530-00100.
[16] 王力宾.多元统计分析:模型、案例及 SPSS 应用[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2010:125-128.
[17] 许冠军, 曾希君. 区分度优先的综合评价方法研究[J].统计与决策,2025,41(13):56-62. DOI: 10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2025.13.009.
[18] 蒯小玲, 易楠, 管程齐, 等. 临床教学绩效改革在临床带教中的应用[J].交通医学,2022,36(1):106-107,110. DOI: 10.19767/j.cnki.32-1412.2022.01.031.
[19] 孟凡荣,李松,杨宇.医院实习带教教学绩效管理模式的实践与探讨[J].中国继续医学教育,2020,12(18):58-61.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2020.18.024.
[20] 肖伟, 吴庆忠, 朱强, 等. 教学医院临床教师教学绩效考核管理研究进展[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2020,19(11):1351-1354. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20191118-00317.
Outlines

/