Objective To analyze the entire-process training materials of master's degree students in clinical medicine and explore factors influencing the quality of their dissertations. Methods From April to July 2024, 41 independent variables were collected for 1 275 professional-degree master's students in clinical medicine enrolled at a teaching hospital affiliated to Zhengzhou University between 2019 and 2020. The variables covered personal information, supervisor information, student origin, academic performance, research experience, and employment status. Mann-Whitney U tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to examine the relationship between each variable and the dissertation score. Variables showing statistical significance were then entered into a multiple linear regression model to identify factors influencing the quality of the graduate dissertations. Results At the individual level, older age at enrollment (β=-0.040, P=0.031), majoring in surgery (β=-0.234, P=0.002), or in smaller-discipline majors such as neurology, emergency medicine, dermatology and venereology (β=-0.254, P<0.001) were all associated with lower-quality master's theses. At the advisor level, students supervised by advisors who were mentoring 3-4 (β=-0.194, P=0.007) or more than four (β=-0.579, P<0.001) current-year master's students produced significantly lower-quality theses, whereas advisors holding administrative positions (β=0.156, P=0.010) were linked to higher-quality theses compared with their non-administrative peers.In terms of training process, higher proposal-defense scores predicted better thesis quality (β=0.065, P=0.035). Regarding employment destinations, students with lower-quality theses were more likely to accept positions in hospitals (β=-0.150, P=0.036), whereas those with higher-quality theses preferred non-hospital units (β=0.185, P=0.021) or further study (β=0.178, P=0.032). Conclusions The quality of professional master's theses in clinical medicine is closely tied to every stage of training.Enhanced research supervision should be provided for late-entry students, those majoring in surgery, and those in smaller disciplines such as neurology, emergency medicine, dermatology and venereology. Paying attention to graduate students' future career intentions, limiting the number of advisees per supervisor, and placing greater emphasis on the thesis proposal defense are practical measures that can raise the overall quality of master's theses.
Liu Zhihui
,
Li Luyao
,
Li Hongyi
,
Li Yuxuan
,
Li Hualin
,
Ding Xianfei
,
Li Lifeng
,
Cheng Bo
,
Zhang Huiqin
,
Sun Tongwen
. An analysis of factors influencing the dissertation quality of professional master's degree students in clinical medicine[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2025
, 45(11)
: 868
-874
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250125-00099
[1] 王战军,张微. 研究生教育强国:概念内涵、核心要素和建设方略[J]. 学位与研究生教育,2024(7):50-57. DOI:10.16750/j.adge.2024.07.007.
[2] 郑飞中.我国临床医学研究生培养模式改革研究[D].厦门:厦门大学,2020.
[3] 谭维,彭仲生,吴晓燕.地方高校专业学位研究生培养质量的调查与提升[J].上海教育评估研究,2021,10(6):53-58.DOI:10.13794/j.cnki.shjee.2021.0084.
[4] 孟佳. 医学院校专业学位硕士研究生学位论文质量提升策略研究[J].科技创新导报,2019,16(24):238-241. DOI: 10.16660/j.cnki.1674-098X.2019.24.238.
[5] 李一峰, 李念念, 叶韧, 等. 不同培养类型临床医学硕士研究生学位论文盲评结果分析[J].中华医学教育杂志,2019,39(9):696-700. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.09.012.
[6] 臧梦云,程慧敏,李冲,等.研究生教育分类发展背景下医学研究生学位论文质量探索[J].西部素质教育,2024,10(22):174-178.DOI:10.16681/j.cnki.wcqe.202422040.
[7] 阴新强, 敬媛媛. 医学院校硕士研究生学位论文存在的问题及其质量提升策略[J].卫生职业教育,2024,42(2):1-4. DOI: 10.20037/j.issn.1671-1246.2024.02.01.
[8] 王兆品,斯淑婷,罗玉信,等.医学院研究生生源对培养质量的影响分析[J].医学教育研究与实践,2020,28(1):45-51.DOI:10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2020.01.012.
[9] 肖亚婷. 基于并轨培养的临床医学专业学位硕士规范化培训效果与问题研究[D]. 广州:南方医科大学,2020.
[10] 王宇星, 丁晓华. 研究生知识创新水平及其影响因素在不同学科间的比较研究[J].黑龙江高教研究,2018(8):91-94. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2614.2018.08.020.
[11] 武婷婷, 冯晨晨. 扩招背景下硕士研究生培养模式改革研究[J].当代教研论丛,2023,9(10):86-90.
[12] 刘璐,刘琦,刘剡,等.新疆某高校附属医院临床医学专业导师队伍的现状调查分析[J].新疆医学,2023,53(4):446-449.
[13] 麻春杰, 李永乐, 董秋梅, 等. 基于研究生期望的导师队伍建设研究[J].中国中医药现代远程教育,2020,18(21):154-156.
[14] 邹志强,毛文娟. 导师的行政职务对研究生论文质量和就业的影响——基于对天津市地方高校调查的实证研究[J]. 黑龙江高教研究,2016(8):11-14. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2614.2016.08.004.
[15] 向茜,栾艳,李勤,等. 临床医学硕士专业学位研究生培养过程的精细化管理初探[J]. 医学理论与实践,2019,32(2):304-307. DOI:10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2019.02.082.
[16] 苏斌虓,董海龙,王晶,等. 提高临床医学硕士专业学位研究生培养质量的思考[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志,2015,14(6):545-548. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2015.06.002.
[17] 史晓林,李春雯. 提高研究生开题报告质量[J]. 教育教学论坛,2020(29):95-97.
[18] 谭晓敏,艾勇琦,高婧,等.广东省某医科大学临床医学学术型硕士生学术水平影响因素分析[J].医学与社会,2019,32(8):131-134.DOI:10.13723/j.yxysh.2019.08.031.
[19] 张萍,张艳萍,梁德东,等. “医教协同”背景下临床医学专业学位研究生科研能力创新培养模式构建[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志,2016,15(4):333-336. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2016.04.003.
[20] 高歌. 临床医学专业学位硕士研究生就业现状与对策研究[J]. 就业与保障, 2024(6): 97-99.
[21] 陈怡琴.加强学位论文质量监控提高专业学位硕士研究生人才培养质量[J].北京教育(高教),2020(5):51-54.
[22] 黄蕾,胡予,靳令经,等. 医教协同背景下临床医学硕士专业学位研究生科研能力培养的调查与研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志,2019,39(4):247-251. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.04.002.