Clinical Teaching

Exploration of the 8-3-2 integrated consultation strategy in medical history taking education

  • Sun Junsheng ,
  • Yuan Fuzhen ,
  • Yao Dingye ,
  • Zhang Eryao ,
  • Ren Jingjing
Expand
  • 1Department of General Practice, Longgang District Central Hospital of Shenzhen & Shenzhen Clinical College of Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518116, China;
    2Department of General Practice, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China

Received date: 2024-11-01

  Online published: 2025-09-28

Supported by

Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project (GZUCM Office Document [2024] No.278);Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project for Undergraduate Universities in Guangdong Province (Guangdong Higher Education Letter [2023] No.4); Funding for the Construction of Key Medical Disciplines in Longgang District, Shenzhen (2024-2027); National Natural Science Foundation of China (72274169)

Abstract

Aiming to address the existing problems in medical history taking education, this study innovatively proposes the 8-3-2 integrated consultation strategy. This strategy incorporates eight elements of traditional consultation, three dimensions of ICE (Ideas, Concerns, and Expectations) consultation, and two techniques of open-ended and closed-ended questioning, establishing a systematic framework for medical history taking. The PROVIDe implementation steps were designed and applied in teaching practice through methods such as mind mapping, scenario-based memorization, and scenario practice. Preliminary results showed that trained interns demonstrated significant improvement in their medical history taking ability scores [(7.13±1.46) vs.(10.94±1.60),P<0.001]. The 8-3-2 integrated consultation strategy provides medical students with a more systematic framework for present illness history taking, effectively enhancing their clinical thinking abilities and doctor-patient communication skills, thus offering new insights and methods for reforming medical history taking education.

Cite this article

Sun Junsheng , Yuan Fuzhen , Yao Dingye , Zhang Eryao , Ren Jingjing . Exploration of the 8-3-2 integrated consultation strategy in medical history taking education[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2025 , 45(10) : 769 -773 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20241101-01135

References

[1] 徐玉梅, 刘翠. 基于健康中国战略的医学生健康人文教育研究[J].中国卫生事业管理,2021,38(1):67-70.
[2] Pitkin RM. Listen to the patient[J]. BMJ, 1998,316(7139):1252. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1252.
[3] Patel R. Enhancing history-taking skills in medical students: a practical guide[J]. Cureus, 2023,15(7):e41861. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41861.
[4] 胡大一. 要充分重视问诊[J].中华心血管病杂志,2024,52(2):115-116. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20231225-00530.
[5] Matthys J, Elwyn G, Van Nuland M, et al. Patients' ideas, concerns, and expectations (ICE) in general practice: impact on prescribing[J]. Br J Gen Pract, 2009,59(558):29-36. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X394833.
[6] 柯红红. 英国全科医学培训核心能力和问诊模式对诊断学问诊教学的启发[J].广西医学,2022,44(1):121-124. DOI: 10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2022.01.25.
[7] Wade DT, Halligan PW. The biopsychosocial model of illness: a model whose time has come[J]. Clin Rehabil, 2017,31(8):995-1004. DOI: 10.1177/0269215517709890.
[8] 万学红, 卢雪峰. 诊断学[M]. 10版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2024: 72-73.
[9] 赵宇, 刘虹. 江苏省医院医患沟通质量控制的调查与分析[J]. 南京医科大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 14(6): 453-455.
[10] 陆斯琦. 医学生医患沟通培养模式和考评体系的现状与改革[J]. 中国校医, 2018, 32(9): 664-665.
[11] 曾雪梅, 王子岳. “生物—心理—社会”医学模式的临床应用[J].心理技术与应用,2014(11):36-38,41. DOI: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2014.11.009.
[12] 杨树珍. 论以患者为中心的护理服务理念[J]. 当代护士(中旬刊), 2014(1):188-189.
[13] 李晓丹, 傅强, 张桦, 等. 现代医学教育体系下的问诊教学新思路及其目标达成[J].中国高等医学教育,2012(9):58-59,109. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2012.09.029.
[14] 梁茜, 张荣. 个体化健康教育方案改善妊娠期糖尿病患者疾病认知和消极情绪的效果分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(17):3141-3144. DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.17.004.
[15] 侯颖慧. 结构式心理干预对急性心肌梗死介入治疗患者疾病不确定感、心理状态及预后的影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2020,28(1):29-32. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2020.01.008.
[16] Khan MS, Butler J. Stability of changes in health status: next step in comprehensively assessing patient-reported outcomes[J]. JAMA, 2022,328(10):923-924. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.13551.
Outlines

/