Teaching quality assurance of university-affiliated hospitals is a key issue in the study of higher education, in which the quality of course teaching directly determines the quality of personnel training, and is an important means of improving teaching quality. At present, most of the medical schools in China still rely on the traditional mode of course evaluation, and there are problems such as unsound course evaluation system and unsatisfactory effect of course evaluation. This study takes as an example Peking University Third Hospital, based on an in-depth analysis of the traditional curriculum evaluation model, the six sigma management method is introduced to systematically improve the expert evaluation model. The design and implementation are carried out from the aspects of perfecting rules and regulations, formulating evaluation indexes, constructing expert online evaluation model and forming closed-loop feedback mechanism. A comprehensive evaluation of the online expert assessment model's efficacy was conducted, incorporating longitudinal analysis of expert evaluation metrics and thematic analysis of focus group interviews. The results show that the number of assessments under the expert online assessment model (414 per year from 2022 to 2023) was 16.8 times that of the traditional assessment model (24.7 per year from 2019 to 2021). The hours of expert assessment increased from 50 hours in 2019 to 1 170 hours in 2023, an increase of 22.4 times; the average score of expert online evaluation was 93.24±0.88, which was not significantly different from that of traditional evaluation mode (93.83±1.15) (P=0.653). The expert online evaluation model based on six sigma management method has been recognized by teachers, departments and medical students. The expert online evaluation model based on six sigma management method is helpful to improve the efficiency of expert evaluation, ensure the stability of evaluation results, and provide a new practical path for the teaching quality assurance of university affiliated hospitals.
He Xuan
,
Liu Qiang
,
Gu Shixian
. Exploration on the improvement of expert evaluation model for clinical teaching quality of clinical medical undergraduates[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2025
, 45(8)
: 561
-566
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250107-00014
[1] 林爱华, 李建华, 李慧, 等. 以学生发展为中心的医学院校线上教学质量监控探索[J].中华医学教育杂志,2020,40(11):863-867. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200410-00533.
[2] 袁立军,魏屹晗,郭睿,等.疫情背景下医学在线教学质量的分析和建议[J].高校医学教学研究(电子版),2020,10(3):28-32,中插1-中插4.DOI:10.3868/j.issn.2095-1582.2020.03.006.
[3] Mikel Harry, Richard Schroeder. Six Sigma[M].New York: Currency,2000:1-13..
[4] Breyfogle III FW, Cupello JM, Meadows B. Managing Six Sigma: a pratical guide to understanding, assessing, and implementing the strategy that yields bottom-line success[M].New York:John Wiley, 2001: 10-13.
[5] 李双,刘富,傅嫣然,等.高等医学院校教师教学能力指标体系构建初探[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2018,39(9):1054-1055. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1256.2018.09.025.
[6] 时艳芳.高等教育评价结果:困境、反思与改进[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2022,28(2):108-120.DOI:10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.pj.2022.02.004.
[7] 何旋, 褚红玲, 谷士贤. 基于德尔菲法构建临床医学专业本科生教学评估指标的研究[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2024,23(3):338-342. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230108-01666.
[8] Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups[J]. Int J Qual Health Care, 2007,19(6):349-357. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
