The standardized residency training policy is the core institutional guarantee for improving the quality of clinical training. Based on the Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) model, this study constructed an evaluation framework with 9 primary variables and 41 secondary variables and conducted a multi-dimensional quantitative analysis of 15 residential training policies issued at the national level from 2013 to 2023. Through the evaluation of PMC index grading criteria (excellent: 8.00-9.00; good: 6.00-7.99; acceptable: 4.00-5.99; poor: 0-3.99), it was found that the average comprehensive score of the sample policies was 7.17 points, which was generally at a good level, including 3 excellent policies, 10 good policies, and 2 acceptable policies. The variables X6 (Policy Evaluation, 0.99) and X2 (Policy Timeliness, 0.89) scored highest6, while X8 (Policy Instruments) and X7 (Policy Support) showed notable weaknesses, with mean values of 0.67 and 0.69, respectively. China′s standardized residency training policy needs to focus on optimizing the structure of policy tools and strengthening demand-oriented policy tools and market incentive mechanisms, improving the mechanism for the introduction of special funds and social capital, and promoting multi-dimensional social investment; improving the cross-departmental coordination mechanism to systematically improve the effectiveness of policies and promote the high-quality development of the residential training system.
Wu Danni
,
Xia Zhouyan
,
Zhu Binhai
. Quantitative evaluation of standardized residency training policy based on the PMC index model[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2025
, 45(6)
: 444
-449
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240720-00763
[1] 齐学进. 以党的二十大精神为指导,推进住培质量建设再上新台阶——在2022年住院医师规范化培训高峰论坛上的主旨报告[J]. 中国毕业后医学教育,2023,7(1):1-5. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2023.01.001.
[2] 陈皓阳,杨叶,莫雯茜,等. 我国住院医师规范化培训政策执行情况分析——基于爱德华政策执行模型[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2021, 38(11):13-17.
[3] 王君妍, 孔军辉, 王君, 等. 医教协同政策实施后北京市第二批住院医师规范化培训现状调查[J]. 中国医院,2021,25(8):48-50. DOI:10.19660/j.issn.1671-0592.2021.8.15.
[4] Dai S, Zhang W, Lan L. Quantitative evaluation of China′s ecological protection compensation policy based on PMC Index Model[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022,19(16):10227.DOI:10.3390/ijerph191610227.
[5] Liu F, Liu Z. Quantitative evaluation of waste separation management policies in the Yangtze River Delta based on the PMC index model[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022,19(7):3815-3823. DOI:10.3390/ijerph19073815.
[6] 卿华,杨恩,李慧欣,等. 基于PMC指数模型的“互联网+”医保支付政策量化评价——16个省市的政策水平比较[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2023, 40(9):655-660,673.
[7] 徐萍萍, 赵静, 李春晓, 等. 我国中央层面家庭医生签约服务政策量化评价:基于PMC指数模型[J]. 中国全科医学,2023,26(4):440-446. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0522.
[8] 成全, 董佳, 陈雅兰.创新型国家战略背景下的原始性创新政策评价[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(12):2281-2293.DOI:10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20210525.001.
[9] 郭俊华,王阳. 乡村振兴背景下农村产业政策优化调整研究[J]. 经济问题, 2022(1):85-92.DOI:10.16011/j.cnki.jjwt.2022.01.011.
[10] 赵思琦, 刘栋梁, 夏毓琦, 等. 基于PMC指数模型的我国慢病管理政策量化评价[J]. 中国药房,2021,32(13):1627-1633. DOI:10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2021.13.16.
[11] 王定才, 叶小燕, 陈永成. 基于PMC指数模型的“互联网+医疗”相关政策量化评价研究[J]. 中国医院, 2023, 27(8):34-37.DOI:10.19660/j.issn.1671-0592.2023.08.10.
[12] 张永安, 耿喆. 我国区域科技创新政策的量化评价——基于PMC指数模型[J]. 科技管理研究,2015,35(14):26-31. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2015.14.006.
[13] 徐萍萍, 赵静, 李春晓, 等. 基于PMC指数模型的我国省级分级诊疗制度量化评价[J]. 卫生软科学,2022,36(12):9-13,20. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2800.2022.12.002.
[14] 程兆鹏, 王高玲. 基于PMC指数的智慧医疗背景下我国适老化卫生服务政策量化评价[J]. 中国医院, 2023, 27(8):57-60.DOI:10.19660/j.issn.1671-0592.2023.08.15.
[15] 王进富,杨青云,张颖颖.基于PMC-AE指数模型的军民融合政策量化评价[J]. 情报杂志,2019,38(4):66-73. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1965.2019.04.011.
[16] 冯杰,吴心怡.基于PMC指数模型的福建省老年康复产业政策评价体系构建研究[J]. 中国市场,2023(27):69-73. DOI:10.13939/j.cnki.zgsc.2023.27.069.
[17] 余秋静,曹娜, 陈宗顺,等.政策工具视角下我国省级层面健康规划政策文本量化分析[J]. 中国卫生政策研究,2021,14(10):25-30. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-2982.2021.10.004.
[18] 屈思琦, 何云峰. 基于PMC指数模型的产教融合政策量化分析及优化[J]. 继续教育研究, 2024(3):105-112. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-4156.2024.03.020.
[19] 刘汝佳,王晶,唐立健,等.政策工具视角下长三角地区妇幼健康人才政策量化分析[J]. 中国卫生政策研究,2023,16(11):31-38. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-2982.2023.11.005.
