Objective To explore the characteristics of online teaching behaviors among teachers at Traditional Chinese Medicine colleges and conduct a classification study, to inform the continual improvement of online teaching. Methods From February to April 2021, a survey was distributed online to 5 621 teachers involved in online teaching tasks from 24 independent higher education institutions specializing in traditional Chinese medicine across the country. A total of 5 225 responses were collected, resulting in a response rate of 93.0%. Descriptive statistical methods were used to obtain average scores for four behavioral characteristics. Correlation analysis was applied to explore the relationships between teaching behavior characteristics, and a two-step cluster analysis was employed to classify the teachers, comparing the online teaching behavior characteristics across different categories. Results The average scores for teacher online teaching behavior characteristics were: Academic Guidance (4.32±0.59), Course Design (4.32±0.66), Teaching Interaction (3.93±0.66), and Self-Evaluation (3.88±0.66). There was a positive correlation between the characteristics of online teaching behaviors. Based on these behaviors, teachers were classified as high-energy, long-term thinkers (2 153 individuals), expectation of returnees (2 278 individuals), and blindly compliant (794 individuals). Conclusions In online teaching behaviors, the characteristics of course design and academic guidance are more prominent; academic guidance shows a relatively close relationship with course design and teaching interaction. High-energy, long-term thinkers demonstrate scientific course design, active teaching interaction, rich academic support, and rational self-evaluation; expectation of returnees exhibit generalized course design, formalized teaching interaction, task-based academic support, and neutral self-evaluation; while blindly compliant teachers show simplistic course design, passive teaching interaction, singular academic support, and low self-evaluation scores.
Zhang Jie
,
Che Yiwen
,
Tan Xi
,
Yuan Na
,
Jiao Nan
. The study of the characteristics and classification of online teaching behaviors of teachers in higher education institutions of traditional Chinese medicine[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2025
, 45(2)
: 130
-134
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230925-00295
[1] 刘桂辉. 走向自主:教师教学行为转变研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2018:34-36.
[2] 刘思强,贺晖. 大学课程在线教学中的有效性教学行为——基于疫情期间大规模在线教学的实证分析[J].现代教育管理,2022(03):66-73. DOI :10.16697/j.1674-5485.2022.03.008.
[3]项聪,陈小平,卢开聪. 高校在线教学效果及其影响因素的实证研究[J].中国大学教学,2021(Z1):93-99. DOI :10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2021.z1.014.
[4]唐琳,王福胜,李海伟. 基于信息熵理论的Stallings课堂教学评价构建与实证研究[J].上海教育科研,2022(3):30-37. DOI :10.16194/j.cnki.31-1059/g4.2022.03.014.
[5] Dyowski C, Kriston L, Harendza S. Psychometric properties of the newly developed physician teaching self-Efficacy questionnaire (PTSQ) [J]. BMC Medical Education, 2016,16(1):247.DOI:10.1186/s12909-016-0764-4.
[6]侯芳芳. 事业单位改革背景下M高校教师职业压力调查研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2019:36-39.
[7]焦楠,谷晓红,袁娜,等. 新冠疫情期间中医药高等院校教师在线教学现状调查研究[J].中医教育,2020,39(5):1-6. DOI : 10.3969/j.issn.1003-305X.2020.05.234.
[8]孙振球,徐勇勇. 医学统计学 [M]. 3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:339-347.
[9]周俊. 问卷数据分析 [M]. 2版.北京:电子工业出版社,2016:118-124.
[10]张静华. 大学教师有效教学行为的学科差异与共性特征[J].江苏高教,2020(3):30-36. DOI :10.13236/j.cnki.jshe.2020.03.005.
[11] 韩磊. “一流本科”背景下高校教师教学能力提升路径研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2019:21.
