Objective To investigate the attitude and influencing factors on academic integrity for medical postgraduates, as well as to inform the promotion of academic integrity. Methods A survey was conducted among graduate students by the cluster sampling at Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, between October 2021 and October 2023. The Bio-psychological-social medical model was utilized to evaluate the effects of social, psychological, and personal factors on medical postgraduates' attitudes toward academic integrity. Data were analyzed using chi-square test and binary logistic regression. Results A total of 1 151 graduate students participated in this study. 14.2% (163/1 151) of respondents exhibited potential risky attitudes toward academic integrity. The logistic regression analysis showed no significant variation between personal factors (all P＞0.05). Psychologically, graduate students with less pressure to publish were 0.65 times more likely to display potential risky attitudes toward academic integrity than those with high pressure (OR=0.65, 95% CI=0.44-0.98). Socially, graduate students who perceived a positive research environment were 0.46 times more likely to exhibit potential risky attitudes toward academic integrity than those in a poor climate (OR=0.46, 95%CI=0.29-0.73). Those who had participated in research training in the last year were 0.66 times more likely to have potential risky attitudes toward academic integrity than those without such training (OR=0.66 , 95% CI=0.45-0.96). Graduate students exposed to advertisements for paper writing or publishing in the last year were 2.67 times more likely to have potential risky attitudes toward academic integrity than those who had not received relevant advertisements (OR=2.67, 95% CI=1.87-3.80). Conclusions The attitudes of a minority of medical graduate students toward academic integrity are at potential risk. Reducing publication pressure, fostering a supportive research environment, promoting research integrity education, and curbing the commercialization of academic work may help reduce the incidence of academic misconduct.
Zhao Lianyi
,
Qiu Liru
,
Wang Fang
,
Zhang Qi
,
Hou Changrong
. Analysis of attitude and influencing factors on academic integrity for medical postgraduates[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2024
, 44(11)
: 853
-857
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240129-00100
[1] 薄涛,陈克勋,雷蕾,等.国家自然科学基金科研诚信和学风建设的分析与思考[J].中国科学基金,2022,36(5):722-728. DOI:10.16262/j.cnki.1000-8217.2022.05.022.
[2] 王琰,王晓芳,陆华,等. 我国医学科研诚信研究的文献计量分析[J].中国循证医学杂志,2022,22(7):829-835. DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.202202082.
[3] 钟沃权, 孙垂国, 李危石, 等. 北京大学第三医院医学研究生科研能力与科研诚信知识现状研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(1):74-78. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200330-00458.
[4] 李允水, 龚浩, 周罗晶. 医学科研诚信治理对策探讨[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,2023,36(1):13-17. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113565-20220901-00176.
[5] 杨云霞. 硕士研究生学术不端行为的成因及对策研究[D].石家庄:河北师范大学,2022.
[6] 汤海涛, 曾雯. 医学研究生对学术不端行为态度的调查[J].中国循证医学杂志,2021,21(9):1024-1027. DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.202102113.
[7] 邹倩, 黄婷, 张嘉惠, 等. 新形势下高校附属医院科研诚信体系建设[J].现代医院,2023,23(11):1784-1786. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-332X.2023.11.041.
[8] Gopalakrishna G, Ter Riet G, Vink G, et al. Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: a survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands[J]. PLoS One, 2022,17(2):e0263023. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263023.
[9] 孙明源. 扭转学术学位和专业学位趋同培养观念[N].科技日报,2024-01-03(005).
[10] 杨庭颂. 取消“博士论文发表要求”的再审思——基于“三角协调模式”的视角[J].研究生教育研究,2022(1):63-71. DOI: 10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2022.01.09.
[11] 白如江, 秦明艳, 张玉洁. 科研数据学术不端影响因素研究[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(20):110-121. DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022060509.
[12] 龙丽,杨英. 医学研究生学术不端行为的调查分析[J].中国医药导报,2014,11(16):129-132.
[13] 江雨莲, 刘爽, 孙激. 医学学术不端论文特征分析及防范对策——以国家卫生健康委员会通报的科研诚信案件为例[J].中国科技期刊研究,2022,33(11):1490-1498. DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.202204200302.
