Objective To develop a rubric to assess the ability of case summary of residents, and verify its validity. Methods In this study, the literatures combined with Delphi method were used to develop a rubric to assess the ability of case summary of residents.A total of 90 hospitalized cases of gastroenterology from the electronic medical record system in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were selected by random number table method.The three raters scored according to the assessment rubric respectively. Cronbach coefficient was used to determine the internal consistency of five assessment criteria, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine the interrater agreement, and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation among the five assessment criteria. Results After literature research and expert consultation, the assessment rubric of case summary ability was clarified,including 5 items of accuracy of clinical information, appropriate narrowing of differential diagnosis, translation of medical terms, use of semantic qualifiers, and global rating of clinical information summary.TheCronbach′s α coefficient of the second expert consultation questionnaire was 0.823 and the content validity index was 0.960.TheCronbach′s α coefficient of the assessment rubric was 0.801. The ICC of every item was 0.834, 0.690, 0.796, 0.802 and 0.760, respectively. The Spearman rank correlation coefficients for translation of medical terms and appropriate narrowing of differential diagnosis and global rating of clinical information summary are 0.71 and 0.69. Conclusions The assessment rubric of case summary ability of residents based on Delphi method has good reliability and validity. The assessment rubric has high internal consistency and inter-rater consistency.Its validation has been preliminarily verified in clinical practice.
Ren Xiaofei
,
Cui Yufang
,
Li Suwen
,
Chen Xi
. The development and preliminary validation of a assessment rubric to assess the ability of case summary of residents[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2024
, 44(5)
: 397
-400
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230415-00396
[1] Smith S, Kogan JR, Berman NB, et al. The development and preliminary validation of a rubric to assess medical students′ written summary statements in virtual patient cases[J]. Acad Med, 2016,91(1):94-100. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000800.
[2] Kennedy TJ, Lingard LA. Questioning competence: a discourse analysis of attending physicians′ use of questions to assess trainee competence[J]. Acad Med, 2007,82(10 Suppl):S12-15. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318140168f.
[3] Dory V, Gagnon R, Charlin B, et al. In brief: validity of case summaries in written examinations of clinical reasoning[J]. Teach Learn Med, 2016,28(4):375-384. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1190730.
[4] Baker EA, Ledford CH, Fogg L, et al. The IDEA assessment tool: assessing the reporting, diagnostic reasoning, and decision-making skills demonstrated in medical students′ hospital admission notes[J]. Teach Learn Med,2015,27(2):163-73. DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011654.
[5] 费健, 何琳, 宋艳艳, 等. 外科学总论不同教学模式的教学效果比较及存在问题分析[J].中国高等医学教育,2009(4):62-63,65. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2009.04.029.
[6] 蒋莹. 临床思维能力的评价方法与应用效果[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2020,4(3):204-209. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2020.03.003.
[7] 何琳, 邓漾, 臧潞, 等. OSCE在外科实习教学中的应用研究[J].西北医学教育,2012,20(1):171-173. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2769.2012.01.064.
[8] Diogo PG, Pereira VH, Papa F, et al. Semantic competence and prototypical verbalizations are associated with higher OSCE and global medical degree scores: a multi-theory pilot study on year 6 medical student verbalizations[J]. Diagnosis (Berl), 2023,10(3):249-256. DOI: 10.1515/dx-2021-0048.
[9] 王勤, 熊丽娟, 熊莉娟. 基于德尔菲专家咨询法构建综合医院病区分类评价指标研究[J].护理研究,2019,33(13):2345-2347. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2019.13.040.
[10] Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application[J]. Am J Med, 2006,119(2):166.e7-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036.