Content analysis of Chinese health talent evaluation policy from the perspective of policy tool

  • Hu Xinyue ,
  • Jiao Nan ,
  • Ye Tongle ,
  • Yuan Na ,
  • Ji Liuyan ,
  • Zhai Shuangqing
Expand
  • 1Master Candidate, Public Administration Major, Enrolled in 2021, School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China;
    2National Center for Chinese Medicine Education Development,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029, China

Received date: 2023-03-24

  Online published: 2024-03-29

Supported by

2022 Project of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TD2022001)

Abstract

Medical and health personnel evaluation policy is the action criterion to ensure the efficient operation of health personnel evaluation work, and the choice of policy tools directly affects the effect of policy implementation. This study took as data source 22 medical and health talent evaluation policies issued by the Central ministries and commissions from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2022, adopts content analysis method, and makes an overall analysis of target policies according to the three-dimensional analysis framework of ″policy instrument-policy element-time series″. The results showed that the current medical and health personnel evaluation policy tools preferred authority and command type, system change type and symbol and exhortation type, incentive type and capacity building type have not received enough attention, and the frequency of use for various sub-tools were also different. In the initial exploration period(from 2009 to 2010), the government emphasized the construction of evaluation guarantee, and the evaluation criteria in the system reform period(from 2011 to 2015) and the deepening reform period(since 2016) were the focus of policy attention, but the evaluation subject and the evaluation application were not concerned. There was insufficient matching between policy elements and policy instruments. Except for evaluation criteria and evaluation guarantees, other policy elements failed to fully cover the five types of policy instruments.Policy makers should optimize the combination and allocation of policy tools according to the characteristics of various policy tools, appropriately increase the attention to the two policy elements of evaluation subject and evaluation application, and strengthen the alignment between policy tools and policy elements.

Cite this article

Hu Xinyue , Jiao Nan , Ye Tongle , Yuan Na , Ji Liuyan , Zhai Shuangqing . Content analysis of Chinese health talent evaluation policy from the perspective of policy tool[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2024 , 44(4) : 241 -245 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230324-00306

References

[1] 张光鹏. 发挥市场作用建立集聚人才体制机制[J].中国卫生人才,2014(3):20-21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7370.2014.03.004.
[2] 陈庆云.公共政策分析[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006:81.
[3] 包水梅,陈嘉诚.政策工具视角下我国“双一流”建设高校教学评价政策偏好研究[J].高校教育管理,2022,16(5):40-51.DOI:10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.20220821.008.
[4] 谭春辉, 梁远亮, 魏温静, 等. 基于四维分析视角的我国科技人才评价政策文本计量与优化[J].情报科学,2022,40(3):63-71. DOI: 10.13833/j.issn.1007-7634.2022.03.009.
[5] 刘声涛. 新时代高等教育评价改革政策工具研究[J].大学教育科学,2022(1):81-88. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0717.2022.01.10.
[6] 张凤娟,胡彬玮.我国重点学科建设政策范式变迁及其嬗变逻辑:基于政策文本的分析[J].教育发展研究,2021,41(19):19-27.DOI:10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2021.19.005.
[7] 陆宇正. 政策工具视角下我国现代职业教育高质量发展的政策研究——基于《关于推动现代职业教育高质量发展的意见》的文本分析[J].中国职业技术教育,2022(1):12-18,27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9290.2022.01.002.
[8] 张丽娜. 新医改十年政策之变迁——基于2009-2019年国家医改政策文本的分析[J].医学与法学,2021,13(4):110-114. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7526.2021.04.022.
[9] 王辉, 陈丹, 刘炳胜. 地方新基建政策文本量化研究——基于政策工具与创新价值链的二维框架[J].中国科技论坛,2023(12):38-50. DOI: 10.13580/j.cnki.fstc.2023.12.012.
[10] 王毅, 田平芬, 安红. 信息技术赋能教育高质量发展——基于政策要素与政策工具的分析[J].开放教育研究,2023,29(1):91-99. DOI: 10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2023.01.010.
[11] 曾燕,唐军,石晶,等.儿科住院医师规范化培训存在问题的思考和对策[J].成都中医药大学学报(教育科学版),2019,21(1):23-24,79.
[12] 中办国办印发《关于分类推进人才评价机制改革的指导意见》[N].人民日报,2018-02-27(01).
[13] 李健,顾拾金.政策工具视角下的中国慈善事业政策研究——以国务院《关于促进慈善事业健康发展的指导意见》为例[J].中国行政管理,2016(4):34-39.DOI:10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2016.04.05.
Outlines

/