Investigation and analysis on current training status based on satisfaction of standardized residency training

  • Yang Ying ,
  • Li Ye ,
  • Wang Ruoning ,
  • Wang Xiang ,
  • Jiang Hui
Expand
  • Office of Continuing Medical Education, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China

Received date: 2023-08-24

  Online published: 2024-01-30

Supported by

Medical Education Research Project of Peking University Health Science Center(2021YB53)

Abstract

Objective To investigate the training status and satisfaction of residents in affiliated hospitals and teaching hospitals of Peking University, identify the problems in standardized training for residents, and propose improvement suggestions. Methods This study used a self-designed electronic questionnaire to investigate the training satisfaction and its influencing factors of residents and professional master′s students in affiliated hospitals and teaching hospitals of Peking University in July 2023. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, logistic regression, and linear regression were used to analyze the training satisfaction and its influencing factors. Results A total of 467 valid questionnaires were collected as a result.The overall satisfaction rate of residents was 74.5%(348/467). The lowest satisfaction was observed with salary [48.6%(227/467)], benefits [56.3%(263/467)], and training intensity [67.5%(315/467)]. The satisfaction level of professional master's students was lower than that of general residents [(3.50±1.16) points vs. (4.13±0.81) points, P<0.001]. About two-thirds of residents work more than 50 hours per week. The overall satisfaction is influenced by factors such as training management, training intensity, satisfaction with training guidance, and whether the training content was suitable for clinical needs(β were 0.435, 0.311, 0.157, and 0.094, all P<0.001) . Conclusions The overall satisfaction of the residents in Peking University is acceptable, and the clinical work intensity and pressure are high. It is necessary to further strengthen training management and guidance, and optimize salary and training intensity.

Cite this article

Yang Ying , Li Ye , Wang Ruoning , Wang Xiang , Jiang Hui . Investigation and analysis on current training status based on satisfaction of standardized residency training[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2024 , 44(2) : 131 -135 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230824-00167

References

[1] 齐学进. 全面实施毕业后医学教育质量提升工程将住培制度建设推向新阶段[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2020,4(6):481-484. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2020.06.001.
[2] 齐学进. 以党的二十大精神为指导,推进住培质量建设再上新台阶——在2022年住院医师规范化培训高峰论坛上的主旨报告[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2023,7(1):1-5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2023.01.001.
[3] 顾金燕, 赵晨浩, 罗兴, 等. 重庆市某三甲医院住院医师规范化培训满意度影响因素调查[J].南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(5):502-506. DOI: 10.7655/NYDXBSS20210517.
[4] 蓝妍玲, 乡汝浩, 王伊晖, 等. 广东省住院医师满意度及其影响因素研究[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2023,7(4):273-276,297. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2023.04.001.
[5] 汪杨, 潘溯洋, 万常春, 等. 湖北省住院医师规范化培训满意度及影响因素研究[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2021,5(5):407-411. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2021.05.006.
[6] 中国医师协会.中国医师协会关于印发住培内容与标准、基地标准(2022年版)的通知[EB/OL].(2022-08-05)[2023-08-20]. https://www.ccgme-cmda.cn/news/15117/article.
[7] 陈丽芬, 王亚军, 李越, 等. 专业学位硕士研究生和住院医师并轨培养模式下工作学习状态调查研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2020,40(11):931-935. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200227-00206.
[8] Mansukhani MP, Kolla BP, Surani S, et al. Sleep deprivation in resident physicians, work hour limitations, and related outcomes: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Postgrad Med, 2012,124(4):241-249. DOI: 10.3810/pgm.2012.07.2583.
[9] 李颜. 住院医师规范化培训指导教师能力标准的研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2017,37(5):763-766. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.05.027.
[10] 张伟, 严晓蕾, 潘沛, 等. 住院医师规范化培训指导医师绩效考核体系的应用效果评价[J].中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(1):83-86. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200529-00848.
[11] 陈迟, 朱亚琴, 罗茜, 等. 住院医师规范化培训全程导师指导能力培训项目的开发设计与实施[J].中华医学教育杂志,2022,42(8):701-704. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220209-00143.
Outlines

/