Qualitative research on the perspective and attitude of general practice specialists and their instructors towards specialist training

  • Zhang Jianxin ,
  • Yao Mi ,
  • Dong Aimei ,
  • Jin Xue ,
  • Qi Zhennan ,
  • Jing Guanning ,
  • Zhou Guopeng ,
  • Chi Chunhua
Expand
  • Department of General Practice, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China

Received date: 2023-03-16

  Online published: 2023-12-29

Supported by

Key Bidding Project of Specialist Training Research of Peking University Health Science Center(2020ZP07)

Abstract

Objective To explore the perspective and attitude ofgeneral practice specialists and their instructors towards specialist training and to inform the development of general practice specialist training. Methods The qualitative research method was adopted. In December 2022, semi-structured interviews were conducted among 7 general specialist trainees and 11 instructors of general practice department from Peking University Health Science Center affiliated teaching hospitals. The interview data were analyzed by thematic framework. Results Three themes were extracted: teachers and students agreed that the purpose and significance of general practice specialist training should be further clarified; training program of general practice specialist training should be personalized; multi-disciplinary integration training should be adopted for general practice specialist training. Conclusions At present, teachers and students generally reflect that the goal of general practice specialist training are not clear, which leads to the unsatisfactory deliverance of process and effect. Therefore, it is suggested that general practice specialist trainees and their instructors should develop an individualized training plan based on the needs of workplace and personal career development, and multi-disciplinary integration training can promote the improvement of the quality of the general practice specialist training.

Cite this article

Zhang Jianxin , Yao Mi , Dong Aimei , Jin Xue , Qi Zhennan , Jing Guanning , Zhou Guopeng , Chi Chunhua . Qualitative research on the perspective and attitude of general practice specialists and their instructors towards specialist training[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2024 , 44(1) : 53 -57 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230316-00265

References

[1] 安康, 张林, 毛婷睿, 等. 卓越全科医学专科医师规范化培训方案的探索与实践[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2022,53(3):431-436. DOI: 10.12182/20220560303.
[2] 王倩, 陈璐, 黎尚荣, 等. 国内外专科医师规范化培训的现状对比及思考[J].继续医学教育,2021,35(8):51-53. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2021.08.030.
[3] 郑嘉堂, 董爱梅, 迟春花. 综合医院设置全科医学科的意义及角色定位探讨[J].中华全科医师杂志,2017,16(5):346-348. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2017.05.003.
[4] 应美珂,刘颖,任菁菁.专科医生对全科医师发展亚专长的态度研究[J].中国全科医学,2019,22(16):1936-1939. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.288.
[5] 刘颖, 陈韶华, 邱艳, 等. 中国亚专长全科医师培养现状及建议[J].中国全科医学,2018,21(22):2664-2667. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.22.004.
[6] 兰叶. 完善培训体系提升全科医疗质量——访北京大学医学部全科医学学系主任迟春花教授[J].中华医学信息导报,2018,33(21):23. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8039.2018.21.021.
[7] Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups[J]. Int J Qual Health Care, 2007,19(6):349-357. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
[8] 陈雄鹰, 姜众, 蔡晖, 等. 美国专科医师培训介绍[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2018,2(3):236-240.
[9] 杨英, 郑丽云, 汪偌宁, 等. 专科医师规范化培训体系建立的探索[J].中华医学教育杂志,2020,40(6):471-475. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200121-00090.
[10] Yellamaty V, Ball L, Crossland L, et al. General practitioners with special interests: an integrative review of their role, impact and potential for the future[J]. Aust J Gen Pract, 2019,48(9):639-643. DOI: 10.31128/AJGP-02-19-4849.
[11] Malik S. GPs with special interests [J].BMJ, 2006,332(7545):133-134.DOI: 10.1136/bmj.332.7545.sgp133-a.
Outlines

/