Objective To explore the effect of using 3D printed craniofacial model on orthodontic cephalometric landmark identification teaching. Methods A total of 70 stomatology undergraduates enrolled in 2017 were selected and randomized into experimental group and control group averagely in June, 2020. The experimental group used 3D printed cranial models to assist teaching while the control group conducted routine teaching. Landmark identification results of the two groups were collected and measured. T-test was used to assess the accuracy of landmark identification. Results The coordinate of porion in control group was (-46.62±1.13,6.33±1.23) and in experimental group was (-46.79±0.21,6.46±0.53), suggesting the dispersion in control group was larger. The difference between the coordinates of porion and the standard point in the control group (0.75±0.83,1.08±0.92) and in experimental group (0.22±0.18,0.65±0.45) were statistically significant (X-axis: t=3.698 P=0.001, Y-axis: t=2.505 P=0.016). Conclusions The teaching of landmark identification in cephalometric measurement assisted by 3D printed model can improve the accuracy of students' landmark identification results.
Zhang Xin
,
Niu Qin
,
Han Bing
,
Chen Si
. Application of 3D printed craniofacial model in landmark identification teaching of orthodontic cephalometric measurement[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2023
, 43(9)
: 679
-682
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220930-01249
[1] 李巍然. 口腔正畸学[M]. 第三版. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2021.
[2] Ghowsi A, Hatcher D, Suh H, et al. Automated landmark identification on cone-beam computed tomography: accuracy and reliability[J]. Angle Orthod, 2022,92(5):642-654. DOI: 10.2319/122121-928.1.
[3] 陈睿, 李雯娟. 虚拟现实技术联合“翻转课堂”在临床医学口腔实习教学中的应用[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2021,20(6):684-687. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20201225-00520.
[4] 金甦晗, 管晓燕, 肖琳琳, 等. 翻转课堂联合CBL教学在口腔正畸学X线头影测量分析实验教学中的应用[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2022,21(2):160-163. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200617-00755.
[5] 何依帆, 李倩琍, 李晓磊, 等. 口腔正畸学本科课程创客式教学设计和应用[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2019,18(4):385-389. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2019.04.013.
[6] Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications[J]. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 2010,5(4):335-341. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-010-0476-x.
[7] Hochman JB, Rhodes C, Kraut J, et al. End user comparison of anatomically matched 3-dimensional printed and virtual haptic temporal bone simulation: a pilot Study[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015,153(2):263-268. DOI: 10.1177/0194599815586756.
[8] 周倩, 魏涛, 胡紫宜, 等. 国内外临床教学中应用3D打印模型相关研究的知识图谱分析[J].中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(1):40-43. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200721-01092.
[9] Li C, Teixeira H, Tanna N, et al. The reliability of two- and three-dimensional cephalometric measurements: a CBCT study[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2021,11(12):2292. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122292.
[10] McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, et al. The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school[J]. Acad Med, 2014,89(2):236-243. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086.
[11] Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements: 2. conventional angular and linear measures[J]. Am J Orthod, 1971,60(5):505-517. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(71)90116-3.
