Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the scale on community care perceptions(SCOPE) among nursing students at vocational colleges. Methods In March 2022, the Chinese version of SCOPE was used to investigate 609 nursing students at 2 vocational colleges in Shandong Province, and the reliability and validity of the scale were analyzed by internal consistency test, content validity index and factor analysis. Results The Chinese version of SCOPE includes a total of 31 items: effective component scale (10 items), placement scale (5 items), profession scale (14 items) and 2 separate items. The Cronbach's α coefficients of the total scale and 3 subscales were 0.963、0.954、0.894 and 0.937 respectively; the content validity index was 0.903; 4 common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, the cumulative variance contribution rate were 71.373%、70.398%、65.998%. Conclusions The Chinese version of SCOPE has good reliability and validity, and it can be used to evaluate the perception attitude of community care among nursing students at vocational colleges.
Wu Yanping
,
Wang Lixin
,
Wang Yunwen
,
Feng Xiujuan
,
Lu Yutong
,
Zhang Yanfang
,
Sun Lili
,
Xu Renhua
. Reliability and validity analysis of the Chinese version of the scale on community care perceptions among nursing students at vocational colleges[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2023
, 43(3)
: 236
-240
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220702-00850
[1] Deloitte. 2018 Globalhealth care outlook: the evolution of smart health care. (2018)[EB/OL]. [2020-02-24]. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Life-Sciences-Health-Care/gx-lshc-hc-outlook-2018.pdf.
[2] 国家卫生计生委.全国护理事业发展规划(2021-2025年)[Z].国卫医发〔2022〕15号.
[3] 韩凤萍, 潘沙沙, 张东梅, 等. 社区护理人员情绪智力、心理韧性和职业成功感的相关性研究[J].中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(32):4169-4174. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.32.009.
[4] 李青, 胡欣, 付凌敏. 南昌市职业学校护生从事社区护理意向调查研究[J].护理研究,2018,32(2):268-271. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2018.02.027.
[5] 曹健, 张秀军. 安徽省专科护生社区职业选择影响因素的调查研究[J].中华全科医学,2017,15(10):1738-1740. DOI: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.10.030.
[6] van Iersel M, de Vos R, Latour C, et al. The scale on community care perceptions (SCOPE) for nursing students:a development and psychometric validation study[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2018,31:61-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.05.002.
[7] 范凤娇, 李小寒. 社区护理感知量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(16):84-87. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.16.084.
[8] Peeters MJ, Harpe SE. Updating conceptions of validity and reliability[J]. Res Social Adm Pharm, 2020,16(8):1127-1130. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.11.017.
[9] 王志燕, 高欢玲, 张红梅, 等. Kihon老年衰弱筛查量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(3):10-13. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.03.010.
[10] Keyworth C, Epton T, Goldthorpe J, et al. Acceptability, reliability, and validity of a brief measure of capabilities, opportunities, and motivations (″COM-B″)[J]. Br J Health Psychol, 2020,25(3):474-501. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12417.
[11] Shultz KS, Whitney DJ, Zickar MJ. Measurement theory in action: case studies and exercises[M]. New York: Routledge, 2013:35-37.
[12] Tuba B, Irem NO, Abdullah B, et al. Validity andreliability of Turkish version of the scale on community care perceptions (SCOPE) for nursing students[J]. Clin Exp Health Sci, 2022, 12: 162-168. DOI: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.897229.
[13] 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):152-155. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
[14] Wilmskoetter J, Bonilha H, Hong I, et al. Construct validity of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10)[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2019,41(5):549-559. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1398787.
[15] 王梦佳, 张瑞星, 常明钰, 等. 心理适应量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2021,56(1):155-159. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.01.026.
