The influential factors of classroom teaching quality among some different programs in China Medical University

  • Li Yanjun ,
  • Guo Qiyong ,
  • Yang Qing ,
  • Yu Hong ,
  • Chen Qi
Expand
  • Education Administration Department, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China (Li YJ, Yu H, Chen Q); Hospital Administration Office, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China (Guo QY, Yang Q)

Received date: 2017-05-02

  Online published: 2020-12-08

Abstract

Objective To explore the comprehensive factors that influence the quality and effect of classroom teaching so as to reform and perfect the classroom teaching methods. Methods A questionnaire was designed and investigated through out 333 students from sophomore to senior which include four programs. The statistical data were analyzed by single factor analysis and post hoc comparison. Results The mean frequency analysis of the questionnaire showed that,factors affecting the teaching quality which students care most is “professional teaching skills” (3.67) and “the ability of expression” (3.66). The most despised factors are “blackboard writing” (2.32) and “the introduction of innovative teaching methods”(2.47). Single factor analysis and post hoc comparison showed that “teacher is full of vitality,with loud voice”(P=0.002),“classes begin and end on time” (P=0.050) and “good classroom discipline” (P=0.045) have significant differences among different programs. Conclusions Strengthening the teaching and expression ability of teachers,and designing individualized teaching methods according to the characteristics of various programs and courses are of great significance for improving the quality of classroom teaching.

Cite this article

Li Yanjun , Guo Qiyong , Yang Qing , Yu Hong , Chen Qi . The influential factors of classroom teaching quality among some different programs in China Medical University[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2018 , 38(1) : 1 -6 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.01.001

References

[1] 郑庆华.运用教学大数据分析技术提高课堂教学质量[J].中国大学教学,2017 (2): 15-18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0450.2017.02.005.
[2] 王海波.国外当前慕课发展中存在的问题探析[J].复旦教育论坛,2015,13(4): 25-30.
Wang HB.Problem in the current development of foreign MOOCs[J].Fudan Education Forum,2015,13(4): 25-30.
[3] L.约翰逊,S.亚当斯贝克尔,V.埃斯特拉达,等.新媒体联盟地平线报告 (2015图书馆版)[J].北京广播电视大学学报,2015 (5): 39-49,60. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7648.2015.05.007.
[4] Douglas J,Douglas A,Barnes B.Measuring student satisfaction at a UK University[J].Quality Assurance in Education,2006,14(3): 251-267. DOI: 10.1108/0968488 0610678568.
[5] Hu Y,Choi J,Mahmutovic A,et al.Assistant instructors facilitate simulation for medical students[J].Journal of Surgical Research,2015,194(2): 334-340. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.11.047.
[6] Harrison MI,Paez K,Carman KL,et al.Effects of organizational context on lean implementation in five hospital systems[J].Health Care Management Review,2016,41(2): 127. DOI: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000049.
[7] 谢琳洁.SPSS软件在高校教学质量影响因素调查分析中的应用[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(1): 541-543.
Xie LJ.Application of SPSS software in the survey and analysis of influencing factors in colleges teaching quality[J].Journal of Anhui Agri Sci,2010,38(1): 541-543.
[8] Leon J,Medinagarrido E,Núñez JL.Teaching quality in math class: The development of a scale and the analysis of its relationship with engagement and achievement[J].Frontiers in Psychology,2017 (8): 895-908. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00895.
[9] Duggan EM,O’Tuathaigh CM,Horgan M,et al.Enhanced research assessment performance in graduate vs.undergraduate-entry medical students: Implications for recruitment into academic medicine[J].QJM,2014,107(9): 735-741. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcu064.
[10] Siemens DR,Punnen S,Wong J,et al.A survey on the attitudes towards research in medical school[J].BMC Medical Education,2010,10(1): 4-10. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-4.
[11] 廖敏.问卷的信度和效度以及SPSS软件运用[J].科技展望,2016,26(16): 290. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8289.2016.16.256.
Outlines

/