Objective To evaluate the effect of problem-based learning(PBL) and case-based leaning(CBL) during clerkship rotation of ophthalmology with Kirkpatrick's Model. Methods Totally 120 five-year program students enrolled in 2016 and received clinical training from April to June 2019 at Ophthalmology Department of Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were enrolled in this research program. The students were randomized into groups of PBL and CBL with 60 in each. The effect of two teaching methods was evaluated by Kirkpatrick's four-level model. The Chi-square test or the t test was used to analyze the data. Results The students of two groups were all satisfied with the scores more than 4 points. The satisfaction scores of students from PBL group and from CBL group were (4.23±0.54) and (4.45±0.49) respectively with stimulating learning interest and students showed preference to CBL method, the score of satisfaction with building of working confidence from CBL group (4.50 ± 0.24) was significantly higher than that from PBL group(4.36±0.32) (all P<0.05). In the view point of learning outcomes, the average theoretical assessment scores of PBL and CBL groups were (85.59±6.63) and (83.98±9.72) respectively without significant difference(P=0.291). At the behavior level there was a high consistency between the results of self-assessment and faculty-assessment of the two groups. PBL method is believed to be more conducive to the cultivation of students' capacity building of to self-oriented learning[(8.88±1.92) vs.(8.02±2.69), (8.48±1.92) vs. (7.60±2.62)], literature reading [(8.82±3.17) vs. (7.58±3.33), (8.41±2.39) vs. (7.44±2.30)] and research thinking [(8.36±3.09) vs. (7.21±2.29), (8.11±2.71) vs. (7.01±2.10)]. CBL method is more conducive to the capacity building of students in patient assessment [(7.45±3.18) vs. (8.72±2.26), (7.04±2.16) vs. (8.42±2.71)] and standardized regulation of clinical operation [(7.20±3.29) vs. (8.32±2.44), (7.07±2.20) vs. (8.16±2.66)](all P<0.05). In terms of occupation intendment, four students from PBL group and five students from CBL group are interested in becoming an ophthalmologist, and already prepared to register for entrance examination of ophthalmology graduate program(P=0.729). Conclusions By using Kirkpatrick's Model, we found that PBL method is more conducive to improving students' capacity building for self-oriented learning and scientific research, while CBL method is more conducive to support the development of students' clinical reasoning and to stimulate their learning interest as well as to constitute their working confidence.
Chen Jing
,
Hu li
,
Wang Guanfeng
,
Wang Shuangyong
. A comparison between the effects of two methods applied in undergraduates' clerkship rotation of ophthalmology with Kirkpatrick's Model[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2022
, 42(9)
: 806
-810
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220118-00071
[1] 杨培增, 范先群. 眼科学[M].9版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:1-4.
[2] Sobocan M, Turk N, Dinevski D, et al. Problem-based learning in internal medicine: virtual patients or paper-based problems?[J]. Intern Med J, 2017,47(1):99-103. DOI: 10.1111/imj.13304.
[3] George T, Carey R, Abraham OC, et al. Trainee doctors in medicine prefer case-based learning compared to didactic teaching[J]. J Family Med Prim Care, 2020,9(2):580-584. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1093_19.
[4] 章文博, 苏家增, 郭玉兴, 等. 网络PBL教学方法在口腔颌面肿瘤教学中的应用评价[J].中华医学教育杂志,2020,40(11):905-908. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200313-00333.
[5] 杨银, 管远志. 基于案例学习在医学微生物学教学中的应用[J].中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(9):807-809. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210226-00256.
[6] Atta IS, Alghamdi AH. The efficacy of self-directed learning versus problem-based learning for teaching and learning ophthalmology: a comparative study[J]. Adv Med Educ Pract, 2018,9:623-630. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S171328.
[7] 吴玲玲. CBL教学法在眼科教学中的应用[J]. 中国继续医学教育,2017,9(3):25-26. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2017.03.012.
[8] Jones C, Fraser J, Randall S. The evaluation of a home-based paediatric nursing service: concept and design development using the Kirkpatrick model[J]. J Res Nurs, 2018,23(6):492-501. DOI: 10.1177/1744987118786019.
[9] Maddineshat M, Hashemi M, Besharati R, et al. The effectiveness of clinical teaching of mental health courses in nursing using clinical supervision and Kirkpatrick's model[J]. Electron Physician, 2018,10(1):6265-6272. DOI: 10.19082/6265.
[10] 孙丹丹, 梁涛. 柯氏评估模型在医学相关培训中的应用现状[J].中华护理教育,2015,12(12):947-949. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2015.12.017.
[11] Solomon Y. Comparison between problem-based learning and lecture-based learning: effect on nursing students' immediate knowledge retention[J]. Adv Med Educ Pract, 2020,11:947-952. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S269207.
[12] Yang Y, Yao JH, Xu LJ, et al. A comparative study of seminars combined with case-based learning versus lecture-based learning for cancer pain teaching in medical oncology internship[J]. J Pain Res, 2021,14:2665-2675. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S320498.
[13] Latif R, Mumtaz S, Mumtaz R, et al. A comparison of debate and role play in enhancing critical thinking and communication skills of medical students during problem based learning[J]. Biochem Mol Biol Educ, 2018,46(4):336-342. DOI: 10.1002/bmb.21124.