Chinese Journal of Medical Education

Chinese Journal of Medical Education >

2022 , Vol. 42 >Issue 4: 376 - 379

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210914-01159

Study on the effect evaluation and influencing factors of clinical epidemiology teaching for medical master candidates

  • Liu Shaohua ,
  • Song Yang ,
  • Jia Wangping ,
  • Wang Shengshu ,
  • Chen Shimin ,
  • Li Xuehang ,
  • Wang Jianhua ,
  • Liu Miao ,
  • He Yao
Expand
  • 1Institute of Geriatrics, Second Medical Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Aging and Geriatrics, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital & Chinese People's Liberation Army Medical Academy, Beijing 100853, China;
    2Department of Wound Infection and Drug,Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongging 400042, China;
    3Graduate School, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital & Chinese People's Liberation Army Medical Academy, Beijing 100853, China

Received date: 2021-09-14

  Online published: 2022-03-29

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(82173590); National Natural Science Foundation of China(82173589)

Fold

Abstract

Objective To explore the teaching effects and influencing factors of clinical epidemiology courses for graduates and provide reference for the reformation and innovation of teaching mode. Methods A total of 409 graduates enrolled in 2020 were selected to investigate the learning situation before and after teaching by questionnaire survey. Using logistic regression model to analyze the influencing factors. Results The score of overall students was (93.2±4.8). The scores of full-time students and part-time students were(94.0±4.9) and (90.2±5.1), respectively.Excellent grades(above 90) were associated with age [OR(95% CI)=0.81(0.70～0.95)], unified enrollment [OR(95% CI)=4.52(2.16～9.43)], case-based learning (CBL) [OR(95% CI)=1.23(1.05～1.44)], desire to improve statistical analysis skills before study [OR(95% CI)=7.26(1.72～33.74)], having studied the course [OR(95% CI)=4.96(2.07～11.87)], conducting post-course review [OR(95% CI)=2.87(1.47～5.60)], and mastery of the instructional content [OR(95% CI)=5.60(1.34～23.44)]. Conclusions Excellent results in the postgraduate clinical epidemiology exam.In addition to age and unified enrollment, CBL, preparation before class and review after class are also the main factors affecting the results. It is suggested that the lecture style should be adjusted according to students' needs and supervise students to develop the habit of preparation and review in order to consolidate and improve the teaching effect.

Key words： Clinical epidemiology; Master candidate; Teaching effect; Influencing factor

Cite this article

Liu Shaohua , Song Yang , Jia Wangping , Wang Shengshu , Chen Shimin , Li Xuehang , Wang Jianhua , Liu Miao , He Yao . Study on the effect evaluation and influencing factors of clinical epidemiology teaching for medical master candidates[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2022 , 42(4) : 376 -379 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210914-01159

References

[1] 王家良,王滨有.临床流行病学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:2-8.
[2] Brownson RC, Samet JM, Chavez GF, et al. Charting a future for epidemiologic training[J].Ann Epidemiol,2015,25(6):458-465.DOI:10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.03.002.
[3] 杨姗姗,何耀,刘淼,等.对医学硕士研究生临床流行病学认知及教学成绩的影响因素调查[J].解放军医学院学报,2015,36(1):86-89.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.01.027.
[4] 陶宁,张园月,徐蕾,等.临床医学专业流行病学教学现状调查[J].继续医学教育,2019,33(4):14-16.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2019.04.008
[5] 李海玲,苏雄,隋静,等.我校研究生临床流行病学教学效果评价与探索[J].中国中医药现代远程教育,2020,18(5):81-83.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2779.2020.05.103.
[6] 付长金,王萍玉.医学硕士研究生临床流行病学认知及教学需求调查[J].医学教育研究与实践,2018,26(2):250-254.DOI:10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2018.02.020.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉