Research on the construction of quality evaluation index system for undergraduates in clinical medicine

  • Wang Gege ,
  • Zeng Ying ,
  • Li Jue
Expand
  • 1Student Affairs Office, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
    2Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received date: 2021-04-22

  Online published: 2022-01-19

Supported by

Academic Degrees and Graduate Education Research Project of Chinese Society of Academic Degrees and Graduate Education in 2018(B2-YX20180205-02);College Students Career Guidance and Service System Construction Project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission in 2018(HJWX20180401)

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to build a quality evaluation index system for clinical medicine undergraduates, and to provide a basis for the development of quality assessment and tracking investigation work for clinical medical profession. Methods The literature research method and the Delphi method were used to formulate the evaluation index of graduate training quality in clinical medicine undergraduates, and two rounds of consultation in 18 medical experts were performed to complete the determination of the indicator. The fuzzy hierarchical analysis method was used to determine the index weights. Results The recovery of the questionnaire was 100.0%,which means that the experts have high enthusiasm. The authority coefficient of experts was 0.88, which means good reliability. The variation coefficient was less than 0.25, and the Kendall's coefficient of concordance(W) was 0.246 (P<0.001), which shows the good concordance degree of expert opinions. This study constructed a comprehensive ability evaluation index system for undergraduates majoring in clinical medicine, including three primary level indicators,nine secondary level indicators and twenty-six tertiary level indicators. Conclusions This study constructed a comprehensive ability evaluation index system for undergraduates majoring in clinical medicine, including three primary level indicators of professional quality, knowledge level, and work ability, nine secondary level indicators and twenty-six tertiary level indicators, which covered the basic requirements of clinical medical undergraduates' training objective, and provided a basis for the development of quality assessment and tracking investigation work for clinical medical profession.

Cite this article

Wang Gege , Zeng Ying , Li Jue . Research on the construction of quality evaluation index system for undergraduates in clinical medicine[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2022 , 42(2) : 180 -184 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210422-00533

References

[1] 颜亮. 地方医学院校毕业生质量评价指标体系研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2014,34(6):805-806,811. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2014.06.002.
[2]赵书阁.高校开展毕业生质量调查工作的困境与对策[J].黑龙江高教研究,2002(3):120-122.
[3]中共中央、国务院印发《中国教育现代化2035》[EB/OL].(2019-09-23)[2021-04-20].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-02/23/content_5367987.htm.
[4] 唐华, 缪青, 李剑鸣, 等. 上海交通大学5届临床医学专业毕业生质量调查分析[J].中华医学教育杂志,2013,33(3):460-463. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2013.03.050.
[5]赵谦, 袁力, 吕思凯, 等. 泰山医学院临床医学专业毕业生核心竞争力的调查[J].中华医学教育杂志,2019,39(2):129-132. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.02.008.
[6] 世界医学教育联合会. 本科医学教育质量改进全球标准(2015年修订版)[J]. 中国教育部临床医学专业认证工作委员会秘书处, 译. 中华医学教育杂志,2019,39(6):401-419. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.06.001.
[7] 教育部,卫生部.教育部 卫生部关于印发《本科医学教育标准——临床医学专业(试行)》的通知[EB/OL].(2008-09-16)[2021-04-20].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/moe_740/s3864/200809/t20080916_109605.html.
[8]冯保庆,高月春,杨林. 《本科医学教育标准》实施方略的研究与探索[J].中华医学教育杂志,2010,30(1):143-146. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2010.01.053.
[9]中国本科医学教育标准—临床医学专业(2016版)[EB/OL].(2018-06-27)[2021-04-20].http://ime.bjmu.edu.cn/cgzs/197708.htm.
[10] 王少娜, 董瑞, 谢晖, 等. 德尔菲法及其构建指标体系的应用进展[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2016,41(5):695-698. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.05.048.
[11]李姝, 马青变, 谷士贤. 德尔菲法在中国临床医学教育中应用的系统评价[J].中华医学教育杂志,2019,39(12):970-973. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.12.019.
[12] 兰继斌, 徐扬, 霍良安, 等.模糊层次分析法权重研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2006(9):107-112.
[13] 张阳.中国临床医学专业本科毕业生岗位胜任力模型构建与现状调查研究[D].沈阳:中国医科大学,2019.
[14] 张新平, 陈俊国. 借鉴美、英医学教育经验推动我国医学教育认证制度的改革[J].中国高等医学教育,2015(1):32-33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2015.01.017.
Outlines

/