Investigation and analysis of parents' opinions on teaching ward round for hospitalized children in a top-three hospital

  • Qi Ji ,
  • Yin Jinqiang ,
  • Li Jing ,
  • Li Hui ,
  • Chen Shuying ,
  • Yang Xiaowen
Expand
  • 1Department of Pediatrics,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an 271000, China;
    2Medical Services Office, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an 271000, China

Online published: 2021-10-29

Abstract

Objective To investigate and analyze the children's parents' opinions on pediatric medical teaching ward round, and put forward the improvement measures.Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 107 parents of children(group A) in a top-three hospital who received resident physician standardized teaching ward round and 121 parents of other children(group B) in the same ward from January 2019 to December 2020. Chi-square test and Fisher exact probability test were used to compare the differences of the children's parents' cognition of the teaching ward round between the two groups.Results The proportion of children <3 years old in group A was significantly lower than that in group B [28.1% (30/107) vs. 70.2%(85/121)](P<0.01) , and 73.8% (79/107) of the children in group A failed to fully cooperate with the performance of teaching ward round. There were 46.7% (50/107) of the parents not willing to accept the teaching ward round again. The percentage of parents who thought that the physical examination caused fear, pain, cold and other discomfort to the children in group A who did not want to go to teaching round again was higher than that of parents who wanted to go to teaching round again [82.0%(41/50)vs. 5.3%(3/57)], there was statistically significant(P<0.01).The percentage of the parents in group B thought that teaching ward round was more helpful to the cognition of children's diseases than that in group A [76.0% (92/121) vs. 36.5% (39/107)], the percentage of children's parents in group B who wanted to go to teaching rounds was higher than that in group A [90.1% (109 / 121) vs. 53.3% (57 / 107)] , there were statistically significant(all P<0.01).Conclusions Most of the parents who didn't accept the teaching ward round just because they didn't see the performance as what they expected. The acceptance of parents of children undergoing teaching rounds needs to be improved. Few children could fully cooperate with the ward round performance, and the majority of cases selected for teaching ward round is elderly children. It is necessary to strengthen the cultivation of medical humanistic quality and clinical skills training in pediatric education. We are trying to explore a personalized mode of pediatric teaching ward round to meet the needs of parents and improve the quality of pediatric resident standardized training.

Cite this article

Qi Ji , Yin Jinqiang , Li Jing , Li Hui , Chen Shuying , Yang Xiaowen . Investigation and analysis of parents' opinions on teaching ward round for hospitalized children in a top-three hospital[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2021 , 41(11) : 1012 -1016 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210427-00561

References

[1] 姜春明, 韩钢. 儿科住院医师规范化培训的探索与思考[J].中国继续医学教育,2017,9(17):3-4. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2017.17.002.
[2]管志伟, 吕伟刚, 张岩, 等. 以学生为中心儿科教学查房模式的探讨[J].中国医药指南,2018,16(33):298-299.
[3]毕丹东, 宋爽, 张江林. 某三甲医院儿科住院患者满意度调查分析及对策研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2014,24(11):110-112.
[4]Nowicka-Sauer K, Jarmoszewicz K, Trzeciak B, et al. Constructivism in patient education: using drawings to explore preconception of coronary artery disease[J]. Kardiol Pol, 2018,76(8):1274-1276. DOI: 10.5603/KP.2018.0165.
[5]赵晨曦,张淑娥,张进,等.美国医学教育体系改革对我国本科临床医学教育的启示[J].中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(4):381-384. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20201118-01604.
[6]中国医师协会住院医师规范化培训教学查房规范专家论证组, 毕业后医学教育部数字培训中心. 住院医师规范化培训教学查房规范(征集意见稿)[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2017,1(2):81-83.
[7]刘彦国,郭鹏,李晓,等.临床教学查房的新认识与新实践[J].中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(4):339-342. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200805-01164.
[8]张遥, 梁平, 何莹,等. 多模式教学方法在儿科住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J]. 重庆医学, 2019, 48(5):889-890,900. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2019.05.043.
Outlines

/