Humanities and social science curriculum at UNMC and Tongji University School of Medicine

  • Yang Yuhong ,
  • Sun Xiaoting ,
  • Jing Ran ,
  • Wei Chunlan ,
  • Yang Wenzhuo ,
  • Zheng Jialin
Expand
  • 1Translational Medicine Center, Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China;
    2University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68131, USA ;
    3Clinical Education Training and Exam Center, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China;
    4Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China

Received date: 2021-04-15

  Online published: 2021-09-28

Abstract

This article describes characteristics of the humanities and social science curriculum at University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) and Tongji University school of medicine from the perspectives of students and medical education researchers. The background, design, format, teaching content, target population of students are compared and implications are discussed. The major differences are curriculum format and teaching content regarding health system science. Based on the comparison, following motions are proposed to optimize the curriculums of humanities and social science at Tongji University. Multidisciplinary collaboration is needed to design competency-based curriculum, while the learning objectives should address the specific issue of patient-physician relationship in China. Faculty development program and teaching assistants program are potential solutions to the shortage of small group facilitators. Furthermore, projects to improve health-care environment in affiliated teaching hospitals should be encouraged to build a better working and learning culture.

Cite this article

Yang Yuhong , Sun Xiaoting , Jing Ran , Wei Chunlan , Yang Wenzhuo , Zheng Jialin . Humanities and social science curriculum at UNMC and Tongji University School of Medicine[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2021 , 41(10) : 956 -960 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210415-00497

References

[1] 吴红斌, 王维民. 世界医学教育改革与发展回顾及我国八年制医学教育的思考[J].中华医学教育杂志,2018,38(5):641-645. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.05.001.
[2] Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world[J]. Lancet, 2010,376(9756):1923-1958. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.
[3] 印发《“健康中国2030”规划纲要》[N]. 人民日报,2016-10-26(001).
[4] Liu Z, Tian L, Chang Q, et al. A competency model for clinical physicians in China: a cross-sectional survey[J]. PLoS One, 2016,11(12):e0166252. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166252.
[5] Metzl JM, Hansen H. Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2014,103:126-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.032.
[6] 王瑾晖, 徐协群, 花苏榕, 等. 医学生助教进行腹腔镜技能培训的教学效果评价[J].基础医学与临床,2019,39(6):912-915. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6325.2019.06.029.
[7] Vaughn LM, Baker RC. Psychological size and distance: emphasising the interpersonal relationship as a pathway to optimal teaching and learning conditions[J]. Med Educ, 2004,38(10):1053-1060. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01952.x.
Outlines

/