Objective To create the dissertation self-examination items used by medical graduates, and to lay the foundation for dissertation quality assurance system. Methods The dissertation items for self-examination were put forward by brain storming and panel discussions. Fifteen senior experts were invited to join the project according to the topics of dissertation examination. Delphi method was utilized. Results Two rounds of inquiries and two rounds of expert consultation were conducted. All the 15 questionnaires in the first round were collected, and 14 questionnaires in the second round were collected. The degree of expert authority was over 0.9. Fifty-three items of self-examination of medical dissertations were accepted. Conclusions The experts of self-examination of dissertation had high authority and were interested in this topic. The selected self-examination items have certain effectiveness and practicability, which provides a basis for the construction of dissertation quality assurance system.
Yuan Wenqing
,
Zhang Aijing
,
Huo Gang
,
Tao Liyuan
,
Gu Shixian
. Construction of dissertation self-examination items by medical postgraduates[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2021
, 41(8)
: 729
-733
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210326-00413
[1] 教育部办公厅. 教育部办公厅关于进一步规范和加强研究生培养管理的通知(教研厅〔2019〕1号)[Z]. 2019-02-26.
[2] 国务院学位委员会,教育部. 国务院学位委员会 教育部关于进一步严格规范学位与研究生教育质量管理的若干意见(学位〔2020〕19 号)[Z]. 2020-09-25.
[3] 张鑫, 王科, 李欣. 研究生学位论文双盲评审的实践与思考[J]. 管理观察, 2018(7):88-90. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2877.2018.07.035.
[4] 李经华, 任金玲, 方坚. 创新管理机制 提高研究生学位论文质量[J].教育教学论坛,2015(2):8-9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9324.2015.02.003.
[5] 张敏, 曾丽珍. 全日制硕士研究生学位论文质量保障体系思考[J].中国成人教育,2017(21):86-88.
[6] 马雪菲, 高雪梅. 基于全面质量管理的研究生学位论文质量保障[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2016(30):15-16.
[7] 娄枝, 张务农, 乔刚. 博士学位论文质量监测评估指标体系研究[J].学位与研究生教育,2020(6):49-54. DOI: 10.16750/j.adge.2020.06.008.
[8] 郭海燕, 刘春荣, 张志斌, 等. 博士学位论文评审制度改革及其成效分析[J].中国高等教育,2019(5):28-31.
[9] Yuan W, Liu Z. What factors affect the quality of medical students' doctoral theses? A comparative study in affiliated hospitals of a Chinese university[J]. Adv Med Educ Pract, 2019,10:297-302. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S201960.
[10] 袁飞, 段昌柱. 临床医学专业学位研究生学位论文质量管理途径研究[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2017,16(12):1193-1198. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2017.12.002.
[11] Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2000,32(4):1008-1015.
[12] McMillan SS, King M, Tully MP. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques[J]. Int J Clin Pharm, 2016,38(3):655-662. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x.
[13] Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, et al. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review[J]. PLoS One, 2011,6(6):e20476. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476.
[14] Bampoe S, Cook T, Fleisher L, et al. Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP)[J]. BMJ Open, 2018,8(11):e023427. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023427.
[15] Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Wood TJ, et al. The use of the Delphi and other consensus group methods in medical education research: a review[J]. Acad Med, 2017,92(10):1491-1498. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001812.
[16] Rüetschi U, Olarte Salazar CM. An e-Delphi study generates expert consensus on the trends in future continuing medical education engagement by resident, practicing, and expert surgeons[J]. Med Teach, 2020,42(4):444-450. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1704708.
[17] 屈京楼, 朱亚鑫, 曲波. 德尔菲法在医学教育研究中的应用[J].中华医学教育杂志,2019,39(3):227-230. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.03.017.
[18] 张颖, 季聪华, 李秋爽, 等. 中医临床实践指南制修订中德尔菲法的统计分析方法[J].中华中医药杂志,2018,33(1):249-251.
[19] 袁文青, 张爱京, 霍刚, 等. 北京大学第三医院学位申请人学位论文写作认知的调查[J].中华医学教育杂志,2019,39(3):214-218. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.03.014.
